PDF(1137 KB)
The impact of chain owner identification on collaborative innovation among enterprises in the chain
Li Jian, Tao Ketao, Bu Xiaoning
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10) : 179-189.
PDF(1137 KB)
PDF(1137 KB)
The impact of chain owner identification on collaborative innovation among enterprises in the chain
Promoting the integration and development of innovation chain, industrial chain and supply chain is the key task of realizing China's scientific and technological self-reliance and building a modern industrial system. This paper takes the identification of chain owners as a quasi-natural experiment, takes the data of A-share listed companies from 2014-2024 as a sample, constructs a multi time point dual difference model, and tests the impact of the identification of chain owners on collaborative innovation among enterprises in the chain. The study found that the identification of chain owner enterprises can promote collaborative innovation among chain enterprises, which is manifested in the establishment of collaborative innovation at the substantive, strategic, innovation quality and effectiveness levels. Chain owner enterprises are the key mechanism to promote collaborative innovation among chain enterprises by giving full play to the head goose effect and resource effect. The analysis of heterogeneity shows that this promotion effect is more prominent in the main chain enterprises with state-owned background, large-scale and international experience, as well as in the scenarios of high dependence on industrial chain supply chain, high external environmental risk and low participation in global value chain. Further research shows that the identification of chain owners can not only reduce the external technology dependence of the industrial chain and supply chain, but also enhance their participation in the global value chain. This paper expands the theoretical research on collaborative innovation between chain owner enterprises and industrial chain supply chain, finds the positive externalities of chain owner enterprises, provides empirical evidence for understanding the role and effect of chain owner enterprises, and also confirms the positive significance of chain owner enterprises in building a modern industrial system.
chain owners / collaborative innovation / head goose effect / resource effect
| [1] |
刘志彪. 产业链政策:中国建设现代化产业体系实践的新趋势[J]. 中国社会科学, 2024(6):12-18.
|
| [2] |
张其仔, 许明. 实施产业链供应链现代化导向型产业政策的目标指向与重要举措[J]. 改革, 2022(7):82-93.
|
| [3] |
中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组, 张其仔. 提升产业链供应链现代化水平路径研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(2):80-97.
Research Group of the Institute of Industrial Economics of CASS,
|
| [4] |
巫强, 胡蕾, 蒋真儿. 产业链与创新链融合发展:内涵、动力与路径[J]. 南京社会科学, 2024(2):27-37.
|
| [5] |
李健, 孟纹羽, 公雪. 产业政策是否提升了制造业产业链自主可控能力?:基于《中国制造2025》的准自然实验[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2025, 41(2):150-160.
|
| [6] |
赵春明, 杨宏举. 数字基础设施建设提升产业链供应链韧性了吗[J]. 当代财经, 2025(9):112-125.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
张亮, 邱斌, 符大海, 等. 人力资本、技术进步与产业链安全[J]. 世界经济, 2025, 48(12):63-89.
|
| [9] |
丁晓娟, 周泽将. 研发投入对供应链韧性的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2025, 22(11):2169-2178.
以2009~2022年沪深A股上市公司为研究样本,基于信号理论和交易成本理论考察企业研发投入对供应链韧性的影响及其作用机理。研究发现,企业研发投入与供应链韧性显著正相关;机制检验表明,研发投入能够向利益相关者传递积极信号、降低供应链交易成本,进而增强供应链抵抗力和恢复力,供应链韧性获得提升。基于企业自身特征的异质性分析表明,研发投入产生的正向影响在数字化转型程度较高、内部研发经验较多的样本中更显著;在宏观经济景气时期和知识产权保护程度较高区域,研发投入与供应链韧性之间的正相关关系更加明显。
Taking A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and the Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from 2009 to 2022 as research samples, the study examines the impact of corporate R&D investment on supply chain resilience and its mechanism based on signaling theory and transaction cost theory. The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between corporate R&D investment and supply chain resilience. Mechanism tests indicate that R&D investment can send positive signals to stakeholders and reduce supply chain transaction costs, thereby enhancing both the resistance and recovery capacities of the supply chain and ultimately improving its resilience. A heterogeneity analysis based on the characteristics of enterprises shows that the positive impact of R&D investment is more significant in the samples with a higher degree of digital transformation and more internal R&D experience. Furthermore, the positive correlation between R&D investment and supply chain resilience is more pronounced during periods of high macroeconomic prosperity and in regions with a high degree of intellectual property protection.
|
| [10] |
李健, 张金林, 步晓宁. 链主企业数字化、成本共担与产业链供应链协同效率[J]. 经济管理, 2025, 47(12):18-35.
|
| [11] |
陶锋, 王欣然, 徐扬, 等. 数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(5):118-136.
|
| [12] |
杨晓霞, 陈晓东. 数字经济能够促进产业链创新吗?:基于OECD投入产出表的经验证据[J]. 改革, 2022(11):54-69.
|
| [13] |
王美香, 陈智, 张耀伟, 等. 产业链与创新链融合闭环构建逻辑:基于万华化学的案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(1):83-94.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
袁业虎, 孙晏平. 供应链核心企业数字化转型对中小企业创新的影响和机制[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(6):12-21.
|
| [16] |
李健, 张金林, 步晓宁. “链主”企业数字化的溢出效应:基于产业链供应链效率的经验证据[J]. 财经研究, 2026, 52(1):49-63.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
许佳琪, 汪雪锋, 雷鸣, 等. 从突破性创新到颠覆性创新:内涵、特征与演化[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2):1-13.
|
| [19] |
盛朝迅. 产业生态主导企业培育的国际经验与中国路径[J]. 改革, 2022(10):34-44.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73.
|
| [22] |
范合君, 吴婷, 何思锦. 企业数字化的产业链联动效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(3):115-132.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
|
| [25] |
王玉泽, 罗能生. 对外直接投资对母国收入差距的影响效应:基于跨国面板数据的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4):1-12.
|
| [26] |
冯灵, 袁晓东. 基于引证的专利丛林识别:以高铁制动技术为例[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4):123-130.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
鞠晓生, 卢荻, 虞义华. 融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(1):4-16.
|
| [29] |
刘啟仁, 赵灿, 黄建忠. 税收优惠、供给侧结构性改革与企业投资[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(1):78-96+114.
|
| [30] |
赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7):114-129.
|
| [31] |
陈林, 陈臻, 张玺文, 等. 产业链融入与企业创新:基于微观企业数据的产业链测度新方法[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(10):56-74.
|
| [32] |
许晖, 刘田田, 单宇. 重构资源连接:中国跨国企业如何打破海外技术封锁[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(6):17-30.
|
| [33] |
李梅, 朱韵, 李竹波. 研发国际化与企业创新绩效:国有股权的调节作用[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(11):73-91.
|
| [34] |
邱卫东, 孙昊. 健全提升产业链供应链韧性和安全水平的时代意蕴、现实境遇与实践遵循[J]. 经济学家, 2026(1):120-128.
|
| [35] |
万源星, 魏紫萱, 王怡舒. 中美贸易摩擦影响中国企业研发国际化吗[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(5):796-807.
基于2001-2019年美国对华发起的贸易调查事件,以我国A股制造业上市公司为研究对象,检验中美贸易摩擦对中国企业研发国际化的影响。研究发现:受出口管制、进口竞争和市场压力的影响,贸易调查涉案企业会选择在下一期减少研发国际化活动。进一步检验发现,上述负面冲击在遭受反倾销或反补贴调查的企业,在美国或发展中国家开展研发活动的企业,以及技术密集型、资本密集型的产业中更显著。根据上述结论,本文提出了应对中美贸易摩擦冲击的建议。
With China's growing scientific and technological strength, the trade disputes initiated by the US against China reflect more a concern that China's technological progress threatens its technological hegemony in addition to reversing trade, economic and social disadvantages. This is also an important reason for the US to focus its trade sanctions directly on the high-tech sector, targeting industries included in the “Made in China 2025” strategic catalogue such as medical devices, high-speed railway equipment and biological medicine, and the high-tech companies such as Huawei, Tencent and Baidu to manufacture low-end lock-in dilemmas. With regard to the current new situation where the globalization of science and technology is constantly deepening and the flow of innovation factors is increasingly forming a global network, latecomer firms in emerging economies such as China, India and Singapore have specified R&D internationalization as an important strategy, seeking for advanced technologies, creating and maintaining competitive advantages on a global scale through the establishment of overseas R&D institutions and other forms, which has macroscopically contributed to the gradual transfer of innovation resources and achievements to emerging economies. On this basis, this paper focuses on the following question: Is the trade dispute initiated by the US against China hindering the internationalization of R&D by Chinese companies due to its wariness of China's technological progress? What are the influence mechanisms? In-depth answers to these questions are of great significance to the implementation of the “Made in China 2025” strategy and the improvement of manufacturing industry’s competitiveness in a complex international environment.Among the literature on trade disputes affecting micro-firm behaviors, those relevant to this paper is to explore how trade disputes affect firm innovation, but the findings are still controversial. Meanwhile, this paper argues that existing research still has the following shortcomings: firstly, the previous research has focused more on how trade disputes affect firms' domestic innovation, lacking empirical evidence on the internationalization of R&D. Secondly, the existing studies mainly explain how trade disputes affect firms' innovation through export control, without exploring other possible pathways rooted in the Chinese context. Finally, the existing research designs usually ignore the two-way causality and sample selection biases.By summarizing the above research findings and shortcomings, based on the trade dispute initiated by the US against China from 2001-2019, this paper takes China's A-share listed manufacturing companies as the research object to examine the impact of Sino-US trade disputes on the internationalization of Chinese firms' R&D, and constructs the PSM-DID model and 2SLS model in the robustness test to improve the credibility of the findings. The results show that facing trade investigations, Chinese firms will reduce their R&D internationalization activities in the next period, which is caused by export control, import competition and market pressure. Further inspection finds that the above negative influence appears more obviously in companies subject to anti-dumping or countervailing investigations, firms conducting R&D in the United States and developing countries as well as technology-intensive and capital-intensive industries. Based on the findings, this paper proposes the following policy suggestions. Government should formulate countermeasures against trade disputes to mitigate the negative impact of export control, import competition and market pressure on firms' R&D internationalization. Firstly, it is necessary to stabilize existing export shares and expand trade partnerships to mitigate export control shocks; secondly, tariffs on US high-tech products should be levied to mitigate import competition shocks; and finally, it is important to guide local governments to set up special funds for R&D internationalization to mitigate market pressure shocks.
|
| [36] |
李青原, 李昱, 章尹赛楠, 等. 企业数字化转型的信息溢出效应:基于供应链视角的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(7):142-159.
|
| [37] |
张杰, 陈志远, 刘元春. 中国出口国内附加值的测算与变化机制[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(10):124-137.
|
| [38] |
孙文浩, 张杰. 中美贸易战何以影响制造业高质量发展[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(9):1559-1569+1596.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |