PDF(1153 KB)
Research on the "four chains" mechanism of how artificial intelligence empowerment reshapes enterprise market competitiveness
Ren Zhiyuan, Zhang Feiyang, Zhu Yuhan
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10) : 11-20.
PDF(1153 KB)
PDF(1153 KB)
Research on the "four chains" mechanism of how artificial intelligence empowerment reshapes enterprise market competitiveness
Against the strategic backdrop of the "AI+" initiative and the promotion of in-depth integration of the innovation chain, industrial chain, capital chain, and talent chain, this study systematically examines the impact mechanism of artificial intelligence on enterprises' market competitiveness from the perspective of the "four chains" using data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2024. The empirical results show that artificial intelligence (AI) exerts a significant enabling effect on enterprises' market competitiveness, and this conclusion remains valid after a series of robustness tests and endogeneity treatments. The enabling effect presents significant heterogeneity:it is more pronounced in small and medium-sized enterprises with low management ownership, as well as firms operating in highly competitive industries, central cities, and regions with a high degree of marketization. Mechanism tests further demonstrate that AI promotes the improvement of corporate competitiveness mainly through four paths:improving the health of the capital chain, optimizing the structure of the talent chain, enhancing the capability of the innovation chain, and boosting the resilience of the supply chain. Moreover, there exists a significant synergistic effect among the "four chains":the capital chain provides the resource foundation, the talent chain delivers the core competence, the innovation chain creates value increments, and the supply chain realizes the transformation of achievements, collectively forming an organic system for AI to empower corporate competitiveness. This study offers a new perspective for understanding the micro-mechanism of AI-driven corporate competitiveness enhancement and provides valuable policy implications for advancing the intelligent transformation of enterprises and the in-depth integration of the "four chains".
artificial intelligence / market competitiveness / "four chains" collaboration / intelligent transformation
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
汪前元, 魏守道, 金山, 等. 工业智能化的就业效应研究:基于劳动者技能和性别的空间计量分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(10):110-126.
|
| [3] |
王永钦, 董雯. 机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场?:来自制造业上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(10):159-175.
|
| [4] |
李玉花, 林雨昕, 李丹丹. 人工智能技术应用如何影响企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024(10):155-173.
|
| [5] |
安同良, 吴致冶. 企业人工智能技术水平的分层测度及其创新效应:基于全球知识网络视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025(6):81-100.
|
| [6] |
姚加权, 张锟澎, 郭李鹏, 等. 人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?:基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(2):101-122+133.
|
| [7] |
潘珊, 李剑培, 顾乃华. 人工智能、产业融合与产业结构转型升级[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025(2):23-41.
|
| [8] |
杜传忠, 曹效喜, 刘书彤. 人工智能与高新技术企业竞争力:机制与效应[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2024(2):30-49.
|
| [9] |
聂常虹, 赵斐杰, 李钏, 等. 对创新链产业链资金链人才链“四链”融合发展的问题研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(2):262-269.
|
| [10] |
周文, 杨正源. 人工智能赋能新质生产力:作用机理与实践进路[J]. 改革, 2025(4):1-15.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
余靖雯, 郭凯明, 龚六堂. 宏观政策不确定性与企业现金持有[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2019, 18(3):987-1010.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
张一林, 郁芸君, 陈珠明. 人工智能、中小企业融资与银行数字化转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(12):69-87.
|
| [17] |
蔡跃洲, 陈楠. 新技术革命下人工智能与高质量增长、高质量就业[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(5):3-22.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
赵剑波, 刘钊. 人工智能渗透率对企业创新效率的影响研究[J]. 经济学动态, 2025(5):55-69.
|
| [21] |
巫强, 黄孚, 汪沛. 人工智能技术与企业创新绩效:兼论新质生产力的赋能作用[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(10):67-80.
|
| [22] |
徐红丹, 王玖河. 人工智能如何赋能企业新质生产力[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(7):1-8.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
洪银兴, 王坤沂. 新质生产力视角下产业链供应链韧性和安全性研究[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(6):4-14.
|
| [25] |
王鹏, 陈蝶欣. 人工智能技术应用与企业韧性:来自机器学习构建AI词典的经验证据[J]. 经济学动态, 2025(9):98-117.
|
| [26] |
胡化广, 刘海建, 周枫凯. 人工智能的“稳链”效应:来自供应链波动的经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2025, 42(10):90-111.
|
| [27] |
张伯伟, 马凡慧. 智能制造如何提升产业链供应链韧性:理论机制与实证检验[J]. 经济学动态, 2024(11):20-37.
|
| [28] |
金碚. 论企业竞争力的性质[J]. 中国工业经济, 2001(10):5-10.
|
| [29] |
谭莹, 刘颖杰, 张勋. 企业数字化转型程度的统计测度:以数字技术人才需求为视角[J]. 经济研究, 2025, 60(4):122-138.
|
| [30] |
孙月, 王新, 郝晓蓓. 上市公司人工智能概念炒作与大股东股份减持[J]. 南方经济, 2025(11):143-162.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a critical driver of China's digital economy, with its integration into industries such as finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail accelerating under national policy support. The 13th and 14th Five-Year Plans emphasize the strategic importance of AI, encouraging deep integration with the real economy and promoting high-quality development. However, despite the potential benefits, the high costs and uncertainties associated with AI-driven transformation led some companies to adopt opportunistic behaviors. Rather than committing to substantial investment, these firms may engage in concept speculation—manipulating textual disclosures to exaggerate their involvement in AI without genuine implementation. Such hype exacerbates information asymmetry, fosters speculative market sentiment, and may be ex‐ploited by insiders, especially majority shareholders with privileged access to information.Uncovering the mechanism through which AI-related concept speculation influences majority shareholders' share reductions is of great significance for regulating corporate information disclosure, curbing opportunistic reductions by major shareholders, and preventing systemic risks in capital markets. This paper constructs an AI concept speculation index using text analysis methods and, from the perspectives of information asymmetry and investor bounded rationality, examines the impact of AI concept speculation on major shareholders' share reductions. Empirical tests are conducted using data from Ashare listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2012 and 2020. The results show that majority shareholders are more likely to sell their shares in response to corporate hyping behavior. This tendency is particularly evident in firms with a higher proportion of individual investors, greater stock price volatility, and higher levels of earnings management. Moreover, majority shareholders are more inclined to reduce their holdings when stock prices are relatively elevated.Share reductions by majority shareholders in firms engaged in AI hype increase the risk of stock price crashes, ultimately harming the interests of small and medium-sized investors. The media can play a critical role in identifying such hyping behaviors and providing early warnings to protect retail investors.This study expands the literature on insider trading by introducing AI concept speculation as a novel and underregulated channel through which majority shareholders execute opportunistic reductions. Based on the findings, it offers concrete policy recommendations to strengthen the regulation of AI-related hype and the stock-selling activities of majority shareholders. Ultimately, it provides insights for promoting enterprises to achieve genuine AI transformation and upgrading,thereby ensuring that technological development is rooted in substance rather than speculation.
|
| [31] |
孙文远, 刘于山. 人工智能对劳动力市场的影响机制研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2023, 37(3):1-9.
|
| [32] |
陶锋, 王欣然, 徐扬, 等. 数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(5):118-136.
|
| [33] |
桂黄宝, 李松, 李文静, 等. 数据要素赋能专精特新企业高质量发展机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2026, 47(1):25-34.
|
| [34] |
刘政, 匡慧姝, 左勇华, 等. 智慧供应链建设对企业数字创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(12):100-111.
|
| [35] |
丁亚楠, 王建新. 网络互动的治理效能:企业盈余管理的视角[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(12):159-177.
|
| [36] |
吕镯, 张恒鑫, 李连伟. 人工智能对企业成长的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(5):55-63.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |