Value-Added tax credit refund, firm innovation, and labor skill premiums

Gu Lanjuan, Zhang Mingyuan, Deng Shulian

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 168-176.

PDF(1040 KB)
PDF(1040 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 168-176. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.08.017  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.08.017

Value-Added tax credit refund, firm innovation, and labor skill premiums

Author information +
History +

Abstract

As a core component of the combined tax and fee support policies, the VAT credit refund policy serves as an important tool for alleviating business operation pressures and promoting common prosperity. Based on data from A-share listed companies in China from 2013 to 2020, this paper employed a difference-in-differences (DID) model to systematically evaluate the impact of the VAT credit refund policy on firms' labor skill premium. The results showed that the refund policy significantly increases the labor skill premium and exhibits heterogeneous effects across firms with different characteristics. The policy effect mainly works through easing financing constraints and stimulating research and development innovation, which enhances the demand for high-skilled workers by enterprises and subsequently raises the skill premium level. At the same time, the supply of labor factors is also an important consideration in the influence path. Further analysis shows that the skill premium increase driven by the VAT credit refund policy improves labor productivity, although there is an optimal range in which the skill premium contributes most effectively to value-added labor output. This paper innovatively approaches the topic from the perspective of skill premium at the micro-individual level, extending the research boundaries of VAT credit refund in the context of labor factor allocation. The findings will provide valuable insights for advancing common prosperity and deepening VAT credit refund reforms.

Key words

VAT credit refund / labor skill premium / financing constraints / R&D innovation / difference-in-differences(DID)

Cite this article

Download Citations
Gu Lanjuan , Zhang Mingyuan , Deng Shulian. Value-Added tax credit refund, firm innovation, and labor skill premiums[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(8): 168-176 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.08.017

References

[1]
Krusell P, Ohanian L, Ríos-Rull J, et al. Capital-skill complementarity and inequality:A macroeconomic analysis[J]. Econometrica, 2000, 68(5):1029-1053.
[2]
宋冬林, 王林辉, 董直庆. 技能偏向型技术进步存在吗?:来自中国的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2010(5):68-81.
Song Donglin, Wang Linhui, Dong Qingzhi. Is there skill biased technological change? Evidence from China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010(5):68-81.
[3]
岳树民, 肖春明. 增值税留抵退税能够缓解企业融资约束吗:基于现金-现金流敏感性的实证证据[J]. 财贸经济, 2023, 44(1):51-67.
Yue Shumin, Xiao Chunming. Can VAT retention tax rebate ease the financial constraints of enterprises? Empirical evidence based on cash-cash flow sensitivity [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2023, 44(1):51-67.
[4]
吴怡俐, 吕长江, 倪晨凯. 增值税的税收中性、企业投资和企业价值:基于“留抵退税”改革的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8):180-194.
Wu Yili, Lyu Changjiang, Ni Chenkai. Value-added tax neutrality,corporate investment and valuation:Evidence from the reform of uncredited VAT refund[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(8):180-194.
[5]
刘行, 叶康涛. 增值税税率对企业价值的影响:来自股票市场反应的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(11):12-24+35+195.
Liu Hang, Ye Kangtao. The effect of value-added tax rate on firm value:Evidence from the reaction of stock market[J]. Journal of Management World, 2018, 34(11):12-24+35+195.
[6]
张仁杰. 增值税留抵退税影响企业数字化转型的路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4):138-146.
Zhang Renjie. Research on the influence path of VAT credit refund on digital transformation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(4):138-146.
[7]
王敏, 李敏丽. 留抵退税政策、企业流动性与劳动要素收入提升[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(4):60-88.
Wang Min, Li Minli. The VAT credit refund policy,corporate liquidity and enhancement of labor factor income[J]. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(4):60-88.
[8]
李逸飞. 增值税留抵退税与企业人力资本升级[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(12):115-140.
Abstract
人力资本升级对实现企业高质量发展、维持国家经济持续增长具有重要意义。本文基于2013-2021年中国A股上市公司微观数据,利用双重差分法评估了2018年增值税留抵退税试点政策对企业人力资本结构的影响。结果显示,增值税留抵退税政策显著提高了企业的高技能劳动力占比,进而优化了企业人力资本结构。作用机制分析表明,增值税留抵退税政策对企业人力资本结构的优化作用主要通过“资本-技能互补”效应和缓解企业流动性约束两条路径来实现。异质性分析发现,对于融资约束严重、资本密集度及研发密集度低、税收负担重的企业,增值税留抵退税政策对人力资本结构的优化作用更为凸显。进一步,增值税留抵退税政策的实施显著提高了员工工资水平,但对劳动收入份额无显著影响。同时,增值税留抵退税政策显著促进了企业劳动生产率的提升,改善了企业经营绩效,提高了企业发明专利数量。本文丰富了增值税留抵退税政策的经济后果研究,为政府部门通过增值税留抵退税政策促进企业转型升级和高质量发展提供了一定的理论借鉴和实践参考。
Li Yifei. Value-added tax refund and corporate human capital upgrading[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2023, 46(12):115-140.
Human capital upgrading is of paramount importance in achieving high-quality corporate development and maintaining sustained national economic growth. Based on panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies from between 2013 and 2021, this paper assesses the impact of the Value-added Tax Refund (VATR) Policy on the 2018 corporate human capital structure using the difference-in-differences (DID) method. The results indicate that the VATR Policy significantly increases the share of highly skilled labour in companies, thus optimising the corporate human capital structure. The mechanism test demonstrates that the optimisation effect of the VATR Policy on the human capital structure of companies is mainly achieved through the “capital-skill complementarity” effect and the easing of corporate liquidity constraints. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the optimisation effect of the VATR Policy on the human capital structure is more significant for companies with severe financing constraints, low capital and R&D intensity, and high tax burden intensity. The implementation of the VATR Policy also significantly increases the level of employees' wages but has no significant impact on the labour income share of companies, while the VATR Policy significantly contributes to an increase in labour productivity, improves business performance and increases the number of invention patents in companies. This paper enriches the study of the economic consequences of the VATR Policy and provides a theoretical and practical reference for government departments to promote corporate transformation, upgrading and high-quality development through the VATR Policy.
[9]
Sun C, Zhan Y, Du G. Can Value-added tax incentives of new energy industry increase firm's profitability? Evidence from financial data of China's listed companies[J]. Energy Economics, 2020, 86:104654.
[10]
刘金科, 邓明欢, 肖翊阳. 增值税留抵退税与企业投资:兼谈完善现代增值税制度[J]. 税务研究, 2020(9):111-118.
Liu Jinke, Deng Minghuan, Xiao Yiyang. VAT refunds and business investments:Improving the modern value-added tax system[J]. Taxation Research, 2020(9):111-118.
[11]
何杨, 邓粞元, 朱云轩. 增值税留抵退税政策对企业价值的影响研究:基于我国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 财政研究, 2019(5):104-117.
He Yang, Deng Xiyuan, Zhu Yunxuan. Research on the impact of VAT rebate policy on enterprise value:An empirical analysis based on listed companies in China[J]. Public Finance Research, 2019(5):104-117.
[12]
吴鹏, 万广华, 常远. 科技成果转移转化与共同富裕:来自中国的验证[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(10):80-90.
Wu Peng, Wan Guanghua, Chang Yuan. Scientific and technological achievements transformation and common prosperity:The verification from China[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(10):80-90.
[13]
Benmelech E, Frydman C, Papanikolaou D. Financial frictions and employment during the great depression[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2019, 133(3):541-563.
We provide new evidence that a disruption in credit supply played a quantitatively significant role in the unprecedented contraction of employment during the Great Depression using a novel, hand-collected dataset of large industrial firms. Our identification strategy exploits preexisting variation in the need to raise external funds at a time when public bond markets essentially froze. Local bank failures inhibited firms' ability to substitute public debt for private debt, which exacerbated financial constraints. We estimate a large and negative causal effect of financing frictions on firm employment. We find that the lack of access to credit likely accounted for a substantial fraction of the aggregate decline in employment of large firms between 1928 and 1933. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V.
[14]
汪冲, 宋尚彬. 研发投入激励对劳动收入份额的影响研究:基于人才集聚和收益共享视角[J]. 财政研究, 2022(9):75-88.
Wang Chong, Song Shangbin. Research on the impact of R&D input incentives on the labor income share-based on the perspective of talent agglomeration and income sharing[J]. Public Finance Research, 2022(9):75-88.
[15]
申广军, 姚洋, 钟宁桦. 民营企业融资难与我国劳动力市场的结构性问题[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2):41-58+217.
Shen Guangjun, Yao Yang, Zhong Ninghua. Financing constraints of private firms and the structural problem in China's labor market[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(2):41-58+217.
[16]
崔惠玉, 田明睿, 王倩. 增值税留抵税款抑制了企业研发投入吗[J]. 财贸经济, 2022, 43(8):59-73.
Cui Huiyu, Tian Mingrui, Wang Qian. Does VAT credit restrict R&D investment of enterprises?[J]. Finance& Trade Economics, 2022, 43(8):59-73.
[17]
蔡伟贤, 沈小源, 李炳财, 等. 增值税留抵退税政策的创新激励效应[J]. 财政研究, 2022(5):31-48.
Cai Weixian, Shen Xiaoyuan, Li Bingcai, et al. Innovation incentive effect of the reform of uncredited VAT refund[J]. Public Finance Research, 2022(5):31-48.
[18]
刘怡, 耿纯. 增值税留抵规模、分布及成本估算[J]. 税务研究, 2018(3):28-36.
Liu Yi, Geng Chun. Some thoughs on the net vat:Offset size,distribution and cost estimation[J]. Taxation Research, 2018(3):28-36.
[19]
Chen B, Yu M, Yu Z. Measured skill premia and input trade liberalization:Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2017, 109:31-42.
[20]
谢杰, 过重阳, 陈科杰, 等. 最低工资、工业自动化与技能溢价[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9):102-120.
Xie Jie, Guo Chongyang, Chen Kejie, et al. Minimum wage,industrial automation and skill premium[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(9):102-120.
[21]
陈东, 郭文光. 数字化转型如何影响劳动技能溢价:基于A股上市公司数据的经验研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(3):173-192.
Chen Dong, Guo Wenguang. How does digital transformation affect labor skill premium:An empirical study onA-share listed enterprises[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(3):173-192.
[22]
吕越, 陆毅, 吴嵩博, 等. “一带一路”倡议的对外投资促进效应:基于2005—2016年中国企业绿地投资的双重差分检验[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(9):187-202.
Lyu Yue, Lu Yi, Wu Songbo, et al. The effect of the Belt and Road Initiative on firms' OFDI:Evidence from China's greenfield investment[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(9):187-202.
[23]
张克中, 何凡, 黄永颖, 等. 税收优惠、租金分享与公司内部收入不平等[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(6):110-126.
Zhang Kezhong, He Fan, Huang Yongying, et al. Tax incentives,rent sharing and within-firm wage inequality[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2021, 56(6):110-126.
[24]
饶品贵, 汤晟, 李晓溪. 地方政府债务的挤出效应:基于企业杠杆操纵的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(1):151-169.
Rao Pingui, Tang Sheng, Li Xiaoxi. The crowding-out effect of local government debt:Evidence from corporate leverage manipulation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(1):151-169.
PDF(1040 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/