PDF(1038 KB)
Research on the impact of corporate strategic radicalization on green innovation
Zhou Haiwei, Yang Jingyi, Wang Teng
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 159-167.
PDF(1038 KB)
PDF(1038 KB)
Research on the impact of corporate strategic radicalization on green innovation
Strategic choice is the starting point and foundation of corporate green innovation decisions. However, the impact of strategic radicalization—an important aspect of strategic choice—on corporate green innovation remains underexplored. This study empirically examined the effect of corporate strategic radicalization on green innovation, using a fixed effects model with data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2013 to 2022. The findings indicated that:(1) strategic radicalization has a positive impact on green innovation, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests;(2) moderation analysis shows that the positive impact of strategic radicalization on green innovation is strengthened by environmental regulation and weakened by organizational slack; and(3) heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect of strategic radicalization on corporate green innovation is significant in manufacturing and technology-intensive firms, but not in non-manufacturing, labor-intensive, or capital-intensive firms. This research extends the study of the drivers of green innovation from the perspective of strategic characteristics. It will provide empirical evidence for governments to build sustainable development policy frameworks and assist companies in formulating green innovation strategies.
strategic radicalization / green innovation / environmental regulation / organizational slack
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
李斌, 彭星, 欧阳铭珂. 环境规制、绿色全要素生产率与中国工业发展方式转变:基于36个工业行业数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(4):56-68.
|
| [3] |
李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励:来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9):192-208.
|
| [4] |
贾建锋, 刘伟鹏, 杜运周, 等. 制度组态视角下绿色技术创新效率提升的多元路径[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(2):51-61.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
于飞, 刘明霞, 王凌峰, 等. 知识耦合对制造企业绿色创新的影响机理:冗余资源的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(3):54-65+76.
|
| [10] |
林雁, 李梦韩, 张泽南. 战略投资者引入对企业绿色技术创新的影响效应与机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(7):79-89.
|
| [11] |
王锋正, 陈方圆. 董事会治理、环境规制与绿色技术创新:基于我国重污染行业上市公司的实证检验[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(2):361-369.
面对资源与环境的双重约束，有效整合内部治理和外部规制，直接关系到企业绿色技术创新的积极性。基于制度规制理论与技术创新理论，以2009-2014年45家重污染行业沪深两市A股上市公司为样本，实证检验了公司董事会治理在环境规制对企业绿色技术创新影响中的作用机制。研究发现：环境规制本身对企业绿色技术创新呈正向影响，董事会治理对企业绿色技术创新呈正向显著影响，且董事会治理在环境规制对企业绿色技术创新影响中呈显著正向调节作用。研究结论表明：面对我国环境承载能力已达到或接近上限的客观现实，并举外部环境政策落实和提高董事会治理水平，对促进企业绿色技术创新，实现提质增效和减污排污具有重要意义。
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
王旭, 王非. 无米下锅抑或激励不足?政府补贴、企业绿色创新与高管激励策略选择[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7):131-139.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
解学梅, 韩宇航. 本土制造业企业如何在绿色创新中实现“华丽转型”?:基于注意力基础观的多案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(3):76-106.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Organizational adaptation is a topic that has received only limited and fragmented theoretical treatment. Any attempt to examine organizational adaptation is difficult, since the process is highly complex and changeable. The proposed theoretical framework deals with alternative ways in which organizations define their product-market domains (strategy) and construct mechanisms (structures and processes) to pursue these strategies. The framework is based on interpretation of existing literature and continuing studies in four industries (college textbook publishing, electronics, food processing, and health care).
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
曹裕, 李想, 胡韩莉, 等. 数字化如何推动制造企业绿色转型?:资源编排理论视角下的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(3):96-112+126+113.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Understanding sources of sustained competitive advantage has become a major area of research in strategic management. Building on the assumptions that strategic resources are heterogeneously distributed acrossfirms and that these differences are stable over time, this article examines the link betweenfirm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Four empirical indicators of the potential of firm resources to generate sustained competitive advantage-value, rareness, imitability, and substitutability-are discussed. The model is applied by analyzing the potential of severalfirm resourcesfor generating sustained competitive advantages. The article concludes by examining implications of this firm resource model of sustained competitive advantage for other business disciplines.
|
| [22] |
郭婧, 张新民. 企业战略激进、信贷周期与债务违约[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(7):38-53.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Accepting a fixed trade-off between environmental regulation and competitiveness unnecessarily raises costs and slows down environmental progress. Studies finding high environmental compliance costs have traditionally focused on static cost impacts, ignoring any offsetting productivity benefits from innovation. They typically overestimated compliance costs, neglected innovation offsets, and disregarded the affected industry's initial competitiveness. Rather than simply adding to cost, properly crafted environmental standards can trigger innovation offsets, allowing companies to improve their resource productivity. Shifting the debate from pollution control to pollution prevention was a step forward. It is now necessary to make the next step and focus on resource productivity.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
陶锋, 赵锦瑜, 周浩. 环境规制实现了绿色技术创新的“增量提质”吗:来自环保目标责任制的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(2):136-154.
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
刘荣增, 何春. 环境规制对城镇居民收入不平等的门槛效应研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(8):41-52.
|
| [37] |
邓新明, 郭雅楠. 竞争经验、多市场接触与企业绩效:基于红皇后竞争视角[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(11):111-132.
|
| [38] |
王化成, 李昕宇, 孟庆斌. 公司战略、诉讼风险与市场反应[J]. 中国会计评论, 2018, 16(3):311-350.
|
| [39] |
The Miles and Snow strategic typology is tested and extended. Based on a sample of businesses in the PIMS data base, the study explores the effectiveness of the strategic types in different environments and the ways in which defenders and prospectors differ in their functional attributes.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
