PDF(1421 KB)
Analysis of the formation process of shared schema driving technological innovation success
Wang Hechun
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 86-95.
PDF(1421 KB)
PDF(1421 KB)
Analysis of the formation process of shared schema driving technological innovation success
How local enterprises can successfully achieve technological innovation is an important issue in the research field of technological innovation. The "shared schema" can decipher the formation process of group cognition, which has more fundamental and essential significance for studying the implementation of "technological innovation" in local enterprises. Therefore, the paper took Gree, a typical enterprise in the local manufacturing industry, as the research object. From the perspective of "schema", the paper investigated the formation mechanism of group cognition among local enterprises. The research found the following:(1) The paper proposes a shared schema that drives the formation of group cognition. In the cognitive structure of local enterprises, there is a "world first" central driving schema that supports organizational innovation. The "world first" of "shared schema" reflects the basic schema values. The "central drive" reflects the basic schema structure. (2)It is industrial capital that has adopted behaviors consistent with the national innovation strategy in the process of technological innovation, forming a specific historical stage of local enterprises' "shared base model". Different from the previous research on state-owned enterprises, the research conclusion believes that the characteristics of state-owned enterprises, such as social responsibility, hard-working, and national responsibility, are not the key to the success of technological innovation of state-owned enterprises. The key to success is for industrial capital to adopt behaviors consistent with the national innovation strategy, which is the inherent reason for the presentation of the characteristics of state-owned enterprises. (3) The formation process of "shared schema" includes four stages:perception, absorption, solidification, and diffusion. Each stage does not play an equal role, and the "perception" stage is the key stage of the whole process. The political credit and national innovation strategy provided by the country are stabilized and unified through "perception". The "long" behavior consistent with the national innovation strategy was adopted to achieve technological breakthrough through endogenous accumulation. The research conclusions will provide some theoretical basis and insights for local manufacturing enterprises to promote the success of technological innovation in complex environments.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
赵坤, 荆林波, 孙锐. 生产型企业众创模式的理论框架建构[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(2):365-374.
针对企业众创模式实践中出现的路径引导缺乏，以及创新组织管理和实践采用难以捉摸问题，本文以环境嵌入、创新网络及内化认知为创新过程关键要素，归纳企业主导型众创模式的一般性理论模型，试图对生产型企业开展众创模式的逻辑过程及边界条件进行探索。本文发现，被多元制度情境和资源共同驱动的创新目标形成、管理者个体认知之上的创新共享基模以及贯穿异质性网络结构间的创新逻辑，是推动企业实践创新模式的根本要素，企业创新能力作为创新工具和系统保障，强化创新过程的顺利实现，创新过程又反哺创新能力提升。本文的发现对于生产型企业从全局视角认识和实践众创模式有重要启示意义。
|
| [4] |
杭宁, 管健. 群体身份变换对群体认同、群际态度的影响:基于认知一致性的再分类模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5):713-720.
再分类模型在认知一致性的基础上，探讨当个体的群体身份发生变化时，新身份融入自我形成群体认同，影响群体态度的过程。该模型将自我、属性、旧群体身份、新群体身份四者放入一个关系框架，系统阐释了自我与共享属性的群体如何通过认知一致性原则产生联结，进而形成自我概念、群体刻板印象和群体认同。当群体身份变换后，对新身份的认同程度以及新旧群体之间的群际态度取决于群体相容性水平。该模型拓展了多重身份认同研究范畴，将单一再分类、双重再分类拓展到身份转变再分类，为减少群际偏见提供了新的实践路径，有助于促进和谐群际关系。今后研究应提供更多群体身份变换有效性的实证证据，丰富身份转变再分类的边界条件。
The present article introduced a recategorization model based on cognitive consistency to explore how new identities were assimilated into the self-concept, along with its attendant consequences on intergroup attitudes. The model specified four key concepts (self, attributes, old group, new group) as interconnected components, which explained how groups with self and shared attributes were connected through the principle of cognitive consistency, thereby forming self-concept, group stereotypes, and group identity. When group identity shifted, the degree of identification with the new group identity and the intergroup attitude depended on the (in)compatibility of the different social groups. This model expanded the scope of research on multiple identities. In addition to single recategorization and dual recategorization, there was a new way to recategorization which was transformed recategorization. And it played an important role in facilitating identity integration and thus contributed to reducing intergroup bias. Future research should provide more empirical evidence of the effectiveness of recategorization to enrich the boundary conditions of the recategorization. |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Using the established definition of situated cognition in organizations as “the interaction of cognitive schemas and organizational context” (Lant 2002), we examine empirical case studies from the last 15 years to illustrate what situated cognitions in organizations might actually look like. Grounded in this research, we develop a framework that identifies how some specific forms of cognitive schemas (i.e., rule schemas, event schemas, person schemas) and specific contexts (e.g., physical contexts, institutional contexts) interact during sensemaking processes to give rise to momentary perceptions that we call situated cognitions. We present evidence that common patterns of interaction between schemas and context may occur during sensemaking in organizations. In terms of theoretical implications, our framework focuses attention on the specific interactions between context and cognition (rather than on context or cognition alone) that comprise situated cognitions, and helps to more concretely define situated cognitions as momentary or temporally bounded perceptions. We offer several practical implications of this framework for managers and suggest avenues for further elaboration on our ideas through research.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Schema theory posits that experiences of maltreatment result in the early development of maladaptive schemas (EMS; Young, Klosko, & Weishaar, 2003, Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide, The Guilford Press: New York, NY). EMS are organized by conditionality; unconditional schemas are theorized to develop early in childhood predominantly in response to experiences of parenting and conditional schemas are theorized to develop later in life in response to other relationships. Despite this distinction, minimal previous research has investigated their differential development. The current study examined the relative contributions of parental and other (peer and intimate partner) emotional maltreatment (EMT) in the differential development of unconditional and conditional schemas. Ninety-seven undergraduate students retrospectively reported their maltreatment experiences using the Lifetime Experiences Questionnaire and completed the Young Schema Questionnaire to measure EMS. Consistent with hypotheses, parental EMT was the strongest predictor of unconditional schemas. Unexpectedly, parental EMT also emerged as the strongest predictor of conditional schemas. Theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
|
| [11] |
Innovation researchers recognize that the uncertainty with regard to the value-creating potential of product innovations increases with their technological novelty, and have argued that the usefulness and value of novel products are socially constructed. Despite this recognition, researchers have not explored how the outer form in which a technological innovation is embodied influences the processes through which the innovation’s value is constructed and perceived. In this paper we argue that by embodying novel technologies in objects with specific functional, symbolic, and aesthetic properties, innovating firms also endow their products with cues that trigger a variety of cognitive and emotional responses. Drawing on psychological research we articulate how such cognitive and emotional responses underlie initial perceptions of value and theorize how innovating firms can influence them through product form design. Our framework explains how product form contributes to perceptions of value by modulating the actual technological novelty of a product innovation and facilitating how customers cope with it. Our theoretical framework makes an important contribution to innovation research and practice because it articulates how product form can be used strategically to achieve specific cognitive and emotional effects and enhance the initial customer perceptions of the value of an innovation.
|
| [12] |
张强, 魏京柔, 陈岩, 等. 组织基模理论:概念内涵、知识框架与未来展望[J]. 南开管理评论, 2026, 29(1):172-184.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
罗瑾琏, 王象路, 程国萍, 等. 科创企业创新架构的设计逻辑与演进过程:来自“SN”的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(8):161-177.
|
| [17] |
李国强, 胡文安, 孙遇春. 科技园区“使能型”创新生态系统构建的案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7):53-60.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
陈晓萍, 徐淑英, 樊景立. 组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].(第二版) 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
张宏亮, 王法锦, 王殿杰. 薪酬管制与国企高管“夺标”[J]. 经济与管理, 2020, 34(6):79-86.
|
| [23] |
王志江. 红色基因视角下国企精神的内涵属性及实践特质[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2020(6):134-144.
|
| [24] |
颜爱民. 伟大复兴进程中民族企业的责任担当[J]. 人民论坛, 2021(26):40-43.
|
| [25] |
姜付秀, 王莹, 李欣哲. 论国有企业的企业家精神[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2021, 35(5):84-94.
|
| [26] |
姬旭辉. 新时代加强党对国有企业领导的理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 理论视野, 2020(7):81-86.
|
| [27] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
