Research on the impact of comprehensive innovation mechanism and system reform on urban digital technology innovation

Fu Kui, Liu Bingrong, Zhang Jie

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 55-64.

PDF(1104 KB)
PDF(1104 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 55-64. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.08.006  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.08.006

Research on the impact of comprehensive innovation mechanism and system reform on urban digital technology innovation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Constructing a comprehensive innovation system and mechanism is a pivotal component of deepening reforms in the new era, serving as a crucial institutional engine for advancing the national innovation-driven strategy and Chinese-style modernization. In the digital era, the institutional dividends unleashed by comprehensive innovation system and mechanism reforms have become key to resolving “bottleneck” constraints in innovation fields, leading digital technological innovation, and cultivating new quality productive forces. Based on the panel data of prefecture-level cities from 2009 to 2022 and utilizing the establishment of the National Comprehensive Innovation Reform Experimental Zone as a quasi-natural experiment, this study employed a difference-in-differences model to investigate the impact and mechanisms of comprehensive innovation system and mechanism reforms on digital technological innovation. The results indicated that the experimental zone construction significantly promotes urban digital technological innovation, and continuously drives digital innovation. Mechanism analysis showed that the reforms facilitate digital innovation through optimizing innovation ecosystems and attracting digital talent agglomeration, while the venture capital agglomeration mechanism remains ineffective. Policy synergy analysis indicates that digital economy policies like Big Data Pilot Zones and Broadband China initiatives enhance the digital innovation effects of the comprehensive innovation system and mechanism reforms, though the policy synergy effect of government data openness remains insignificant. The coordinated implementation of these three digital economy policies with innovation system reforms generates multiplicative effects in driving digital innovation. Theoretically, this research elucidated the intrinsic mechanisms through which comprehensive innovation system and mechanism reforms drive digital technological innovation in digital ecosystems, and will provide empirical evidence for establishing long-term mechanisms that support comprehensive innovation systems in cultivating new quality productive forces.

Key words

comprehensive innovation system and mechanism reforms / digital technology innovation / Comprehensive Innovation Reform Experimental Zone

Cite this article

Download Citations
Fu Kui , Liu Bingrong , Zhang Jie. Research on the impact of comprehensive innovation mechanism and system reform on urban digital technology innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(8): 55-64 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.08.006

References

[1]
余长林, 杨国歌, 杜明月. 产业政策与中国数字经济行业技术创新[J]. 统计研究, 2021, 38(1):51-64.
Yu Changlin, Yang Guoge, Du Mingyue. Industrial policies and technological innovation in China's digital economy industry[J]. Statistical Research, 2021, 38 (1):51-64.
[2]
胡增玺, 马述忠. 市场一体化对企业数字创新的影响:兼论数字创新衡量方法[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(6):155-172.
Hu Zengxi, Ma Shuzhong. The impact of market integration on enterprise digital innovation:Also on the measurement methods of digital innovation[J] Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58 (6):155-172.
[3]
Zhao Y Y, Peng B H, Lqbal K, et al. Does market orientation promote enterprise digital innovation? Based on the survey data of China's digital core industries[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2023, 109:135-145.
[4]
钟坚, 冯峥. 知识产权制度建设与企业数字技术创新:来自中国制造业上市公司的证据[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2024, 39(3):114-128.
Zhong Jian, Feng Zheng. Intellectual property system construction and digital technology innovation of enterprises:Evidence from listed manufacturing companies in China[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, 2024, 39 (3):114-128.
[5]
韩先锋, 郑酌基, 李勃昕, 等. 行政体制改革、营商环境优化与数字创新驱动:来自“放管服”的新证据[J]. 公共管理学报, 2024, 21(4):1-15+166.
Han Xianfeng, Zheng Zhuoji, Li Boxin, et al. Administrative system reform,business environment optimization and digital innovation-driven development:New evidence from“streamlining administration,delegating power,improving regulation and upgrading services”[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2024, 21(4):1-15+166.
[6]
徐辉, 李艺, 周孝华. 传统金融可得性对企业数字技术创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(8):123-134.
Xu Hui, Li Yi, Zhou Xiaohua. Traditional financial availability of digital technology innovation research[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(8):123-134.
[7]
赵放, 蒋国梁, 马婉莹. 数据要素市场赋能数字产业创新:来自准自然实验的证据[J]. 经济评论, 2024(3):109-125.
Zhao Fang, Jiang Guoliang, Ma Wanying. Data element markets empower digital industry innovation:Evidence from quasi-natural experiments[J]. Economic Review, 2024(3):109-125.
[8]
Ciarli T, Kenney M, Massini S, et al. Digital technologies,innovation,and skills:Emerging trajectories and challenges[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(7):104289.
[9]
Si S, Hall J, Suddaby R, et al. Technology,entrepreneurship,innovation and social change in digital economics[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119:102484.
[10]
黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展:来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(3):97-115.
Huang Bo, Li Haitong, Liu Junqi, et al. Digital technology innovation and high-quality development of Chineseenterprises:Evidence from enterprise digital patents[J] Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58 (3):97-115.
[11]
陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5):68-91.
Tao Feng, Zhu Pan, Qiu Chuzhi, et al. Research on the impact of digital technology innovation on enterprise market value[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40 (5):68-91.
[12]
王欣, 杜宝贵. 全面创新改革试验政策对专利产出的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(8):1418-1427.
Abstract
基于一项准自然试验,通过构建双重差分模型,探究了全面创新改革试验政策对专利产出的影响,并探讨了区域异质性、城市行政层级异质性对政策效果的影响。研究发现:全面创新改革试验政策显著促进了专利产出,并且科技财政支出、信息基础设施与城市人口对专利产出具有显著促进作用;区域异质性、城市行政层级异质性影响了政策效果,全面创新改革试验政策显著促进了东部城市、地级市专利产出;人才储备、外商投资对东部城市与非东部城市的作用存在显著差异。
Wang Xin, Du Baogui. The impact of comprehensive innovation reform pilot policies on patent output[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2021, 39 (8):1418-1427.
[13]
薛飞, 刘家旗, 付雅梅. 全面创新改革试验区政策对城市创新能力的影响研究[J]. 城市问题, 2024(6):74-82.
Xue Fei, Liu Jiaqi, Fu Yamei. Research on the impact of comprehensive innovation reform pilot zone policies on urban innovation capacity[J]. Urban Problems, 2024(6):74-82.
[14]
王敏, 张兴隆, 段佳萌. 全面创新改革试验区能否促进产业结构升级[J]. 财经科学, 2022(3):135-148.
Wang Min, Zhang Xinglong, Duan Jiameng. Can the Comprehensive Innovation Reform Pilot Zone promote the upgrading of industrial structure[J]. Finance & Economics, 2022 (3):135-148.
[15]
付奎, 张杰, 刘炳荣. 国家级全面创新改革试验区建设的经济效应:制度红利与传导机制[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(5):33-43.
Fu Kui, Zhang Jie, Liu Bingrong. The economic effects of the construction of national-level comprehensive innovation and reform pilot zones:Institutional dividends and transmission mechanisms[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(5):33-43.
[16]
Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation:An institutional perspective[J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(1):52-61.
[17]
叶祥松, 刘敬. 政府支持与市场化程度对制造业科技进步的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(5):83-98.
Ye Xiangsong, Liu Jing. The impact of government support and marketization degree on technological progress in manufacturing industry[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55 (5):83-98.
[18]
Fang X B, Liu M T. How doesthe digital transformation drive digital technology innovation of enterprises? Evidence from enterprise's digital patents[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 204:123428.
[19]
潘丹丹, 范从来, 王子敏. 风险投资持股与关键数字技术创新[J]. 现代金融研究, 2025, 30(3):32-43.
Pan Dandan, Fan Conglai, Wang Zimin. Venture capitalshareholding and key digital technology innovation[J]. Journal of Modern Finance, 2025, 30 (3):32-43.
[20]
孙伟增, 毛宁, 兰峰, 等. 政策赋能、数字生态与企业数字化转型:基于国家大数据综合试验区的准自然实验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(9):117-135.
Sun Weizeng, Mao Ning, Lan Feng, et al. Policy empowerment,digital ecosystem and enterprise digital transformation:A quasi-natural experiment based on the national big data comprehensive pilot zone[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(9):117-135.
[21]
郑浦阳. 政府数据开放、地区要素培育与企业数字技术创新[J]. 财经科学, 2024(9):89-103.
Zheng Puyang. Government data openness,regional element cultivation and enterprise digital technology innovation[J]. Finance & Economics, 2024(9):89-103.
[22]
Hagiu A, Wright J. Data-enabled learning,network effects and competitive advantage[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2023, 54(4):638-667.
[23]
戴若尘, 王艾昭, 陈斌开. 中国数字经济核心产业创新创业:典型事实与指数编制[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(4):29-48.
Dai Ruochen, Wang Aizhao, Chen Binkai. Innovation and entrepreneurship in core industries of China's digital economy:Typical facts and index compilation[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2022(4):29-48.
[24]
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J A. The colonial origins of comparative development:An empirical investigation[J]. American Economic Review, 2001, 91(5):1369-1401.
We exploit differences in European mortality rates to estimate the effect of institutions on economic performance. Europeans adopted very different colonization policies in different colonies, with different associated institutions. In places where Europeans faced high mortality rates, they could not settle and were more likely to set up extractive institutions. These institutions persisted to the present. Exploiting differences in European mortality rates as an instrument for current institutions, we estimate large effects of institutions on income per capita. Once the effect of institutions is controlled for, countries in Africa or those closer to the equator do not have lower incomes. (JEL O11, P16, P51)
PDF(1104 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/