Research on the mission-driven ecosystem orchestration in the context of key core technology breakthroughs

Jia Yibo, Su Jingqin, Yang Daozhou, Xiong Bingqiao

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 15-23.

PDF(1194 KB)
PDF(1194 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8) : 15-23. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.08.002  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.08.002

Research on the mission-driven ecosystem orchestration in the context of key core technology breakthroughs

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Driven by the mission to address national strategic needs, establishing a mission-oriented ecosystem holds significant importance in addressing China's key core technology breakthrough challenges with strategic and social contextual characteristics. Based on the theory of ecosystem orchestration, an exploratory single case study method was adopted to select the Yangtze Laboratory, which has been deeply involved in the integrated circuit industry, as the research object. The study found that:(1) In the context of key core technology breakthroughs, "architects" build mission-driven ecosystems by adopting two types of orchestration strategies:strategic architecture design and action architecture design; (2) From the perspective of innovation resources, this paper summarized the multiple mechanisms of mission-driven ecosystem orchestration strategy, namely, focus mechanism, linkage mechanism and leverage mechanism; (3) The concept of mission-driven ecosystem and three types of core characteristics are summarized, namely, national mission-driven orientation, core enterprises as "architects" and independent exploratory innovation activities. The findings will not only contribute to the literature on innovation ecosystems and ecosystem orchestration, but also provide a new path for China to accelerate the breakthrough of key core technologies to achieve the strategic goal of high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement under the complex and severe domestic and international situations.

Key words

key core technology / mission-driven ecosystem / ecosystem orchestration / architect

Cite this article

Download Citations
Jia Yibo , Su Jingqin , Yang Daozhou , et al. Research on the mission-driven ecosystem orchestration in the context of key core technology breakthroughs[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(8): 15-23 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.08.002

References

[1]
孙中原, 窦倩, 楼旭明, 等. 科技创新体系化能力助力关键核心技术突破的机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(5):22-33.
Sun Zhongyuan, Dou Qian, Lou Xuming, et al. Research on the mechanism of technological innovation systematization capability assisting breakthroughs of key core technologies[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(5):22-33.
[2]
孙冰梅, 尹西明, 陈劲, 等. 同题共答:创新联合体驱动关键核心技术持续突破的机制研究:以之江实验室为例[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27 (6):74-87.
Sun Bingmei, Yin Ximing, Chen Jin, et al. Co-innovation forshared mission:The mechanism of innovation consortium driving key core technology breakthroughs:A case study based on Zhijiang Lab[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2024, 27 (6):74-87.
[3]
冯堃, 李显君, 熊昱, 等. 关键核心技术研究综述:概念、结构、突破路径与机制[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(12):21-30.
Feng Kun, Li Xianjun, Xiong Yu, et al. A review of key core technologies:Concept,structure,breakthrough path and mechanism[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(12):21-30.
[4]
谭劲松, 宋娟, 陈晓红. 产业创新生态系统的形成与演进:“架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(9):167-191.
Tan Justin, Song Juan, Chen Xiaohong. The formation and evolution of industrial innovation ecosystem:“Architect” transition and the evolution of its strategic behavior[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(9):167-191.
[5]
尹西明, 张贝贝, 陈泰伦, 等. 我国集成电路现代化产业体系构建的战略与路径思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39 (7):1191-1204.
Yin Ximing, Zhang Beibei, Chen Tailun, et al. Insights on strategy and approach for China to construct a modern integrated circuits industrial system[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39 (7):1191-1204.
[6]
柳卸林, 常馨之. 构建市场导向的核心技术创新生态系统[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(3):614-623.
Abstract
新型举国体制相关文献已丰富讨论了政府主导的核心技术的供给模式,但是,大量市场导向的产业核心技术供给问题,仍然缺乏讨论。研究以荷兰阿斯麦公司(ASML)作为典型案例,分析光刻设备生产商如何通过创新生态系统实现光刻行业的核心技术突破。研究发现,在产业核心技术开发过程中,企业应当构建具有动态性和长期性的价值主张,发挥技术选择和布局的主体作用。在编排市场导向的创新生态系统时,核心企业需要关注非主流用户需求、与主流用户深度捆绑、带动互补者成长,参与非营利性联盟组织,营造良好的竞合生态环境。研究提出以创新生态系统为抓手,打造市场导向产业核心技术的创新模式,不仅为企业发挥创新主体作用提供实践经验,而且对构建政府和市场协同共创的供给模式提供参考。
Liu Xielin, Chang Xinzhi. Building a market-oriented innovation ecosystem for core technologies[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(3):614-623.
There is already an extensive discussion in the literature on the government-led supply mode for core technologies in the new national system. However, there still needs to be more discussion on the supply of core technologies in market-oriented industries. This research analyzes how the lithography equipment manufacturer ASML in the Netherlands achieves breakthroughs in the core technology of the lithography industry through an innovative ecosystem, serving as a typical case study. The study finds that companies should build dynamic and long-term value propositions in developing core technology in the industry and play a leading role in technology selection and layout. When constructing market-oriented innovation ecosystems, core companies need to focus on non-mainstream user needs, deeply integrate with mainstream users, drive the growth of complementary parties, participate in non-profit alliance organizations, and create an excellent competitive and cooperative environment. This research proposes an innovative mode of market-oriented core technology in the industry based on the innovation ecosystem, which provides practical experience for companies to play the role of innovation leaders and provides a reference for constructing a government-market collaborative supply mode.
[7]
Mazzucato M. Mission-oriented innovation policies:Challenges and opportunities[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2018, 27(5):803-815.
[8]
Autio E. Orchestrating ecosystems:A multi-layered framework[J]. Innovation, 2021, 24(1):96-109.
[9]
Harima A, Harima J, Freiling J. Ecosystemorchestration:Unpacking the leadership capabilities of anchor organizations in nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2024, 48(6):1404-1450.
Although prior research emphasizes the essential role of anchor organizations’ leadership in entrepreneurial ecosystem development in the early stages, their strategic functions are undertheorized. This study conducted a single case study with the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Santiago de Chile as a revelatory case by examining how anchor organizations catalyze the early evolution of the entrepreneurial ecosystem from the perspective of the orchestration theory. We developed a framework of ecosystem orchestration to demonstrate how anchor organizations adapt their strategic functions in managing and building various networks and resources to dynamic environments in entrepreneurial ecosystems.
[10]
Linde L, Sjodin D, Parida V, et al. Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration:A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 166:120614.
[11]
Bonomi S J, Fernandes A R, de Oliveira P T, et al. Increasing entrepreneurial ecosystem-level outcomes through orchestration:A proposed framework[J]. Technovation, 2023, 128:102873.
[12]
Shen L, Shi Q, Parida V, et al. Ecosystem orchestration practices for industrial firms:A qualitative meta-analysis,framework development and research agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2024, 173:114463.
[13]
Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases:Opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1):25-32.
[14]
苏敬勤, 贾依帛. 我国工商管理案例研究现状、应用前景及情境化深度[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(6):791-802.
Su Jingqin, Jia Yibo. The research status,application prospects and contextualized depth of case studies of business administration in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018, 15(6) :791-802.
[15]
Panico C, Cennamo C. User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, 43(3):507-529.
[16]
Dosi G, Lampert F, Mazzucato M, et al. Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work:An agent-based exploration[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2023, 151:104650.
[17]
Liang X, Luo Y, Shao X, et al. Managing complementors in innovation ecosystems:A typology for generic strategies[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2022, 122(9):2072-2090.
[18]
宋娟, 谭劲松, 王可欣, 等. 创新生态系统视角下核心企业突破关键核心技术“卡脖子”:以中国高速列车牵引系统为例[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(5):4-17.
Song Juan, Tan Justin, Wang Kexin, et al. Removing bottlenecks in critical core technologies from the perspective of innovation ecosystem:A case study of China's high-speed train traction system[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2023, 26(5):4-17.
[19]
解学梅, 王宏伟, 余生辉. 上下同欲者胜:开放式创新生态网络结构对价值共创影响机理[J]. 管理科学学报, 2024, 27(3):133-158.
Xie Xuemei, Wang Hongwei, Yu Shenghui. Success comes to those who share in one purpose:Influence mechanism of open innovation ecological network structure on value co-creation[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2024, 27(3):133-158.
[20]
王寅, 贾翠雪, 张明明, 等. 如何实现区域创新生态系统高水平双元创新?:基于战略三角的组态分析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(2):87-102.
Wang Yin, Jia Cuixue, Zhang Mingming, et al. How to achieve the high-level ambidexterity innovation of regional innovation ecosystems? A configuration analysis based on strategic triangle[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2024, 46(2):87-102.
[21]
Stahl B C. Responsible innovation ecosystems:Ethical implications of the application of the ecosystem concept to artificial intelligence[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2022, 62:102441.
PDF(1194 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/