PDF(1596 KB)
Study on the antecedent configuration of green technology innovation urban network status enhancement
Fan Decheng, Xu Jingwen
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 139-150.
PDF(1596 KB)
PDF(1596 KB)
Study on the antecedent configuration of green technology innovation urban network status enhancement
It is important to clarify how to improve the urban status of green technology innovation networks to bridge the development gap of green technology innovation between cities and realize the national “double carbon” goal. Based on the big data of firm-level green technology patents from 2015 to 2021, the study depicts China’s green technology innovation urban network, constructs a theoretical model to enhance the urban status of the green technology innovation network from three aspects: “supply and demand side” business environment, urban administrative level, and economic development level, and uses dynamic QCA method to conduct empirical research. The study found that: first, the green technology innovation urban network has the structure of “interaction inside and outside the circle” with the characteristics of mobility and stability, but the network status of city nodes is unbalanced, and the edge cities are still facing the dilemma of insufficient network embeddedness. Second, the “supply and demand side” business environment, urban administrative level, and economic development level are the multiple concurrent factors that enhance the urban status of the green technology innovation network. The “administrative level” dominance and the “economic level - business environment” synergy are the two equivalent logics to achieve high urban network status. The “supply pull” and “supply-demand linkage” of the “supply and demand side” business environment are their marginal and core conditions, respectively. Third, for the network entities in different positions, the feasible paths to improve the urban status of green technology innovation networks with the business environment are different. The core cities are dominated by the “factor supply side” business environment, while the edge cities rely on the balanced linkage of the “supply and demand side” business environment or the strong driving of the “factor supply side” business environment. On the one hand, under the network-based urban spatial structure, the study provides policy references for the country to build a new development pattern of inter-city green technology innovation cooperation and integration. On the other hand, the findings put forward multiple feasible paths for cities to enhance the green technology innovation network status, and provide empirical evidence for network edge cities to utilize the business environment to mitigate their difficulties in improving urban network status due to their low administrative level and economic level.
green technology innovation / urban network status / business environment / supply-demand side / dynamic QCA
| [1] |
杨浩昌, 李廉水, 张发明. 高技术产业集聚与绿色技术创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(9):99-112.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
肖雁飞, 张宝俪, 廖双红. 环境规制对绿色技术创新的影响研究:分阶段数字化转型的调节分析[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(11):99-108.
|
| [7] |
汪明月, 李颖明, 张浩, 等. 市场导向驱动企业绿色技术创新模型构建与路径分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(20):112-120.
基于对企业绿色技术创新环境和驱动力转换介质的分析,构建企业绿色技术创新基本要素模型,并给出要素的内涵特征及所遵循的准则,阐述了市场导向对企业绿色技术创新的影响路径。结果显示,企业绿色技术创新发生于系统环境中,并以系统收益最大化为目标,市场化机制是其驱动力转换的重要介质。基础知识突破、企业社会资本积累、产品市场需求、企业创新网络、消费主体意识、市场准入时机及政府政策是企业绿色技术创新要素模型的重要构成。构建和优化企业绿色技术创新基本要素模型必须遵守适合性准则、动态性、干预性及系统性准则,而释放绿色技术创新要素供需信号,促进创新所需要素协同,降低企业绿色技术创新交易成本,提高创新要素配置效率是市场导向影响企业绿色技术创新的主要路径。
|
| [8] |
刘剑民, 夏琴, 徐玉德, 等. 产业技术复杂性、政府补助与企业绿色技术创新激励[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(2):94-103+149+104-105.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
李志军, 张世国, 李逸飞, 等. 中国城市营商环境评价及有关建议[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2019(2):30-42+257.
|
| [14] |
“中国城市营商环境评价研究”课题组, 李志军, 张世国, 等. 中国城市营商环境评价的理论逻辑、比较分析及对策建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5):98-112+8.
“Research on Evaluation of Doing Business in Chinese Cities” Research Group,Li Zhijun,
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
李志军. 中国城市营商环境评价[M]. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 2020.
|
| [17] |
In the carbon neutrality strategy, facilitating the green innovation of enterprises and promoting industrial upgradation have become a key issue. We explore the relationship between the financial ecological environment, financing constraints, and green innovation of manufacturing enterprises based on endogenous growth and stakeholder theories. Manufacturing companies listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange during 2010–2020 are taken as samples. With the help of principal component analysis, a comprehensive index of the annual financial ecological environment is constructed. The SA index is employed to measure the financing constraints of firms, and the number of granted green patents is used to measure the green innovation of manufacturing enterprises. We conclude that the green innovation of manufacturing enterprises will relax their financing constraints. The financial ecological environment positively moderates the relationship between green innovation and corporate financing constraints. An excellent financial ecological environment enhances the mitigation effect of green innovation of manufacturing enterprises on their financing constraints. Policy implications are given according to the conclusion.
|
| [18] |
Accepting a fixed trade-off between environmental regulation and competitiveness unnecessarily raises costs and slows down environmental progress. Studies finding high environmental compliance costs have traditionally focused on static cost impacts, ignoring any offsetting productivity benefits from innovation. They typically overestimated compliance costs, neglected innovation offsets, and disregarded the affected industry's initial competitiveness. Rather than simply adding to cost, properly crafted environmental standards can trigger innovation offsets, allowing companies to improve their resource productivity. Shifting the debate from pollution control to pollution prevention was a step forward. It is now necessary to make the next step and focus on resource productivity.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
李博阳, 张嘉望, 沈悦, 等. 绿色债券发行对绿色技术创新影响的路径和机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(11):134-142.
|
| [21] |
张三保, 曹锐. 中国城市营商环境的动态演进、空间差异与优化策略[J]. 经济学家, 2019(12):78-88.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
白俊红, 蒋伏心. 协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(7):174-187.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
邓慧慧, 刘宇佳, 王强. 中国数字技术城市网络的空间结构研究:兼论网络型城市群建设[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9):121-139.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?:基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):141-155.
|
| [30] |
Qualitative comparative analysis is increasingly applied in strategy and organization research. The main purpose of our essay is to support this growing community of qualitative comparative analysis scholars by identifying best practices that can help guide researchers through the key stages of a qualitative comparative analysis empirical study (model building, sampling, calibration, data analysis, reporting, and interpretation of findings) and by providing examples of such practices drawn from strategy and organization studies. Coupled with this main purpose, we respond to Miller’s essay on configuration research by highlighting our points of agreement regarding his recommendations for configurational research and by addressing some of his concerns regarding qualitative comparative analysis. Our article thus contributes to configurational research by articulating how to leverage qualitative comparative analysis for enriching configurational theories of strategy and organization.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |