PDF(2167 KB)
Improving efficiency and enhancing capacity of the national innovation system under global co-opetition: A multidimensional logical explication
Shen Neng, Shang Xiaofei, Liu Fengchao
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 65-78.
PDF(2167 KB)
PDF(2167 KB)
Improving efficiency and enhancing capacity of the national innovation system under global co-opetition: A multidimensional logical explication
Against the backdrop of global co-opetition, improving efficiency and enhancing capacity within the national innovation system is a core component for advancing Chinese modernization and achieving scientific and technological self-reliance. The “efficiency” and “capacity” of the national innovation system are two sides of the same coin; they reflect and reinforce each other, ultimately driving a leap in overall systemic effectiveness. By placing equal emphasis on both efficiency and capacity, this paper explores the multidimensional logical implications of the effectiveness of the national innovation system. First, the realistic logic is driven by strategic imperatives: high-quality economic development necessitates a path of high-level scientific and technological self-reliance, making the improvement of efficiency and capacity within the national innovation system an objective requirement to achieve this goal. Second, the underlying logic lies in tracing the roots: by deconstructing the generative mechanisms of overall effectiveness, this study reveals the true essence of improving efficiency and enhancing capacity, thereby laying a solid foundation for such continuous efficiency and capacity enhancement. Third, the theoretical logic aims to clarify the conceptual nexus: from a multidimensional perspective, it conducts an integrative analysis of the “external circulation” under the new paradigm of comprehensive opening-up and the “internal circulation” driven by the new whole-nation system for technological breakthroughs, thereby constructing a theoretical framework for enhancing the efficiency and capacity of the national innovation system. Finally, the practical logic focuses on breakthroughs and leapfrog development: by concentrating on both the process performance and the outcome performance of the national innovation system, it seeks breakthroughs through optimizing internal structures and expanding functional outputs, ultimately elevating the system’s overall effectiveness.
effectiveness of the national innovation system / global co-opetition / dual circulation / the new whole-nation system / multidimensional logic
| [1] |
盛朝迅, 荣晨, 吴迪. 中国式现代化背景下我国构建新发展格局的主要标志与对策研究[J]. 宏观质量研究, 2022, 10(6):1-13.
|
| [2] |
唐任伍, 温馨, 武天鑫. 国家创新体系的数字化重构:新型举国体制驱动的机理与路径[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024, 45(1):3-15.
|
| [3] |
范晔. 粤港澳大湾区科技创新体系整体效能提升研究[J]. 学术论坛, 2023, 46(3):44-54.
|
| [4] |
柳卸林, 马驰, 汤世国. 什么是国家创新体系[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 1999(5):20-22.
|
| [5] |
王亚刚, 席酉民. 国家创新体系的构建与评估:基于和谐管理理论的系统探讨[J]. 中国软科学, 2007(3):53-58+75.
|
| [6] |
柳剑平, 程时雄. 社会资本的双重特性及其对国家创新体系构建的作用机理[J]. 管理世界, 2012(5):172-173.
|
| [7] |
马名杰. 新时期国家创新体系建设重在解决三大核心问题[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(9):1-3.
|
| [8] |
张鹏, 袁富华. 新时代中国国家创新体系建设:从工业化创新体系到城市化创新体系[J]. 经济学家, 2020(10):96-106.
|
| [9] |
冯泽, 陈凯华, 冯卓. 国家创新体系效能的系统性分析:生成机制与影响因素[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3):1-9.
|
| [10] |
杨媛棋, 杨一帆, 寇明婷. 科技金融支持国家创新体系整体效能提升研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3):10-18.
|
| [11] |
雷小苗. 提升国家创新体系效能的机制与路径:基于“科学—技术—产业”协同视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(7):1504-1512.
当今国际科技竞争本质上是创新体系的竞争。创新体系是“母”，科技产品是“子”。本文直面我国创新体系效能研究中存在的重“效”轻“能”问题，提出“创新体系效能”要“效”与“能”并重。“效”，是将创新体系看作“黑箱”，分析创新投入产出绩效；“能”，将创新体系看作“白箱”，考虑内部运作结构，“科学-技术-产业”各环节间的协同度、开放度、深度、广度、速度等。“效”与“能”结合，是基于结果导向和过程导向的全面评价，能满足深层管理决策需要。构建“科学-技术-产业”理论分析框架；提炼创新体系的结构特征及协同模式；兼顾“效”与“能”，从创新绩效、创新协同度、创新开放度、创新深度、创新广度、创新速度等方面剖析提升创新体系效能的机制，探讨体系结构、协同模式与产出绩效之间的关系，提出提升创新体系效能，要增强创新主体之间的“协同性”；促进增强创新的广度与深度；依据体系结构、协同模式与产出绩效之间的对应关系，探索不同产业情境下的最佳创新路径。从而为学研机构、企业、政府等精准施策和科学决策提供理论指导。
当今国际科技竞争本质上是创新体系的竞争。创新体系是“母”，科技产品是“子”。本文直面我国创新体系效能研究中存在的重“效”轻“能”问题，提出“创新体系效能”要“效”与“能”并重。“效”，是将创新体系看作“黑箱”，分析创新投入产出绩效；“能”，将创新体系看作“白箱”，考虑内部运作结构，“科学-技术-产业”各环节间的协同度、开放度、深度、广度、速度等。“效”与“能”结合，是基于结果导向和过程导向的全面评价，能满足深层管理决策需要。构建“科学-技术-产业”理论分析框架；提炼创新体系的结构特征及协同模式；兼顾“效”与“能”，从创新绩效、创新协同度、创新开放度、创新深度、创新广度、创新速度等方面剖析提升创新体系效能的机制，探讨体系结构、协同模式与产出绩效之间的关系，提出提升创新体系效能，要增强创新主体之间的“协同性”；促进增强创新的广度与深度；依据体系结构、协同模式与产出绩效之间的对应关系，探索不同产业情境下的最佳创新路径。从而为学研机构、企业、政府等精准施策和科学决策提供理论指导。
|
| [12] |
陈劲, 尹西明, 陈泰伦, 等. 有组织创新:全面提升国家创新体系整体效能的战略与进路[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(3):1-14.
|
| [13] |
孟凡蓉, 张润强, 陈子韬. 国家创新体系整体效能:概念内涵与分析框架[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2024, 13(4):103-116.
|
| [14] |
彭绪庶, 张宙材. 中国区域创新体系效能测度与演进特征研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(17):78-87.
基于区域经济体系效能概念内涵界定，构建区域创新体系效能评价指标体系，采用兼具纵横向比较的方法，测算2012—2020年中国内地30个省（市、区）创新体系效能指数。研究发现：自中共“十八大”以来，在创新驱动发展战略推动下，各省（市）创新体系效能都有不同程度提高，总体保持上升态势。30个省域可以划分为4个梯队，创新体系效能分层基本固化，但省域空间分布呈现创新分化加剧和创新极化增强的重要特征与发展趋势；基本形成东部创新引领、中部创新崛起的空间分布格局，东中部与东北、西部地区之间的差距不断拉大。
|
| [15] |
相瑞兵, 田成诗, 侯立春. 基于城市视角的国家创新体系效能评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(12):81-86.
|
| [16] |
Over the past 20 years, the term “ecosystem” has become pervasive in discussions of strategy, both scholarly and applied. Its rise has mirrored an increasing interest and concern among both researchers and managers with interdependence across organizations and activities. This article presents a structuralist approach to conceptualizing the ecosystem construct. It presents a clear definition of the ecosystem construct, a grammar for characterizing ecosystem structure, and a characterization of the distinctive aspects of ecosystem strategy. This approach offers an explicit examination of the relationship among ecosystems and a host of alternative constructs (business models, platforms, coopetition, multisided markets, networks, technology systems, supply chains, value networks) that helps characterize where the ecosystem construct adds, and does not add, insight for the strategy literature.
|
| [17] |
柳卸林, 杨培培, 王倩. 创新生态系统:推动创新发展的第四种力量[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(6):1096-1104.
在全球竞争格局不断发生变化的形势下，创新的作用日益凸显，促使创新发生的驱动力也在不断发生改变。除传统的市场力量和政府力量可以驱动创新外，社会力量及创新生态系统力量的兴起也不断推动了创新进程。其中创新生态系统力量由于不同的创新理念、作用方式和目标等为中国的创新发展带来了前所未有的机遇和挑战。因此，梳理了不同类型的创新驱动力，并结合其不同特征进行了对比。同时，基于创新生态系统作为第四种创新驱动力的特征，讨论了其当前在我国面临的机遇和挑战，并给出了相关的建议。
Innovation has been assumed to have played a vital role in the ever-changing global competitive environment, and the driving forces of innovation have also been changing. In addition to the traditional ones-the market and the government-, entering the digital era, the rise of society force and innovation ecosystem have also emerged as the important forces. Among those four forces, the innovation ecosystem has provided China with unprecedented opportunities and challenges due to its different characteristics, such as the ideas creation, action modes and strategic goals. Therefore, we analysed those four different types of driving forces towards innovation and made a comparison of their natures. Finally, this paper also discussed the opportunities and challenges from the rising of innovation ecosystem as kind of special force and provided some policy suggestions.
|
| [18] |
高洪玮. 新阶段打造开放创新生态:发展进程、时代要求与战略应对[J]. 经济学家, 2024(3):77-86.
|
| [19] |
李炳炎, 余飞. 以新质生产力推进经济高质量发展的理论逻辑及实践路径[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024(6):5-15.
|
| [20] |
雷小苗, 杨名, 李良艳. 科技自立自强与开放创新有机协同:双循环格局下的理论、机制与路径研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(5):916-924.
科技自立自强与开放创新辩证统一。“双循环”新发展格局为两者的协同发展提供了新思路和战略载体，对于建设世界科技强国意义重大。从系统论看，国内、国际创新活动具有整体性、关联性、开放性、动态平衡性、1+1>2非加和性等特征。“科学-技术-市场”理论框架中，三个子系统互相衔接、有效联动、协同作用是实现自立与开放协同的基础。“内循环”与“外循环”协同和“自立”与“开放”协同具有内在逻辑的统一性。“双循环”格局下促进自立与开放协同的路径包括：一是合作模式多元化：加强基础研究的国际合作，推动“外循环”下大小循环相结合的多元开放模式。二是内部协作高效化：弥合国内产学研协同创新链“断裂”，提升“内循环”下的科技自立自强。三是内外循环协同化：以内促外，以外提内，科技自立自强与开放创新双轮驱动。
the dialectical unity of scientific and technological self-reliance and open innovation. The new development pattern of "double cycle" provides new ideas and strategic carriers for the coordinated development of the two, which is of great significance for building a world scientific and technological power. The thought of system theory is the theoretical basis of the organic coordination between scientific and technological self-reliance and open innovation under the pattern of "double circulation". The three subsystems of "science technology market" are interconnected, effectively linked and synergetic, which is the theoretical framework of self-reliance and open synergy under the new pattern of "double cycle". The coordination paths of the two include: first, strengthen international cooperation in basic research and promote the diversified open mode of combining large and small cycles under the "external cycle"; Second, efficient internal cooperation: bridge the "fracture" of the domestic industry university research association's co innovation chain and improve the self-reliance of science and technology under the "internal cycle"; Third, the coordination of internal and external circulation: promoting the outside from the inside and promoting the inside from the outside, and the two wheel drive of scientific and technological self-reliance and open innovation.
|
| [21] |
戴翔. 双循环推进中国式现代化的逻辑及路径[J]. 财贸研究, 2022, 33(11):1-9.
|
| [22] |
黄茂兴, 薛见寒. 新发展格局下我国数字服务贸易高质量发展路径研究[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024(3):49-60+129.
|
| [23] |
苏屹, 李忠婷. 区域创新系统主体合作强度对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(3):64-76.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
李文强. 新时代提升国家创新体系整体效能路径研究[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2023(3):53-58.
|
| [27] |
徐君, 郭鑫, 蒋雨晨. 区域创新生态圈自主进化能力评价及实证研究[J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(1):108-113+119.
|
| [28] |
王京, 陈晶, 李舒妍. 创新生态系统视角下数字技术对区域创新绩效的影响效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(5):94-104.
|
| [29] |
陈红花, 尹西明, 陈劲, 等. 基于整合式创新理论的科技创新生态位研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(5):3-16.
|
| [30] |
熊光清, 熊健坤. 多中心协同治理模式:一种具备操作性的治理方案[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2018, 32(3):145-152.
在推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化过程中，各地进行了积极探索，取得了一定成效，并积累了成功经验。通过理论回溯与案例验证，将多中心理论与协同学统合起来，运用到治理领域中，可以提炼出一种多中心协同治理模式。这一模式消除了单一中心治理存在的局限性，解决了治理主体的多元化问题；又提出了处理多元治理主体之间关系的合理方案，强调发挥多元治理主体之间的协同效应，因而具有较强的可行性。多中心协同治理模式为推进国家治理能力建设提供了一种具备操作性的治理方案。
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
崔永华, 王冬杰. 区域民生科技创新系统的构建:基于协同创新网络的视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(7):86-92.
|
| [33] |
叶伟巍, 梅亮, 李文, 等. 协同创新的动态机制与激励政策:基于复杂系统理论视角[J]. 管理世界, 2014(6):79-91.
|
| [34] |
周文, 李吉良. 新型举国体制与中国式现代化[J]. 经济问题探索, 2023(6):1-10.
|
| [35] |
张天悦. 新发展格局下中国式创新的演进逻辑[J]. 改革, 2024(5):33-44.
|
| [36] |
High-definition televisions should, by now, be a huge success. Philips, Sony, and Thompson invested billions of dollars to develop TV sets with astonishing picture quality. From a technology perspective, they've succeeded: Console manufacturers have been ready for the mass market since the early 1990s. Yet the category has been an unmitigated failure, not because of deficiencies, but because critical complements such as studio production equipment were not developed or adopted in time. Under-performing complements have left console producers in the position of offering a Ferrari in a world without gasoline or highways--an admirable engineering feat, but not one that creates value for customers. The HDTV story exemplifies the promise and peril of innovation ecosystems--the collaborative arrangements through which firms combine their individual offers into a coherent, customer-facing solution. When they work, innovation ecosystems allow companies to create value that no one firm could have created alone. The benefits of these systems are real. But for many organizations the attempt at ecosystem innovation has been a costly failure. This is because, along with new opportunities, innovation ecosystems also present a new set of risks that can brutally derail a firm's best efforts. Innovation ecosystems are characterized by three fundamental types of risk: initiative risks--the familiar uncertainties of managing a project; interdependence risks--the uncertainties of coordinating with complementary innovators; and integration risks--the uncertainties presented by the adoption process across the value chain. Firms that assess ecosystem risks holistically and systematically will be able to establish more realistic expectations, develop a more refined set of environmental contingencies, and arrive at a more robust innovation strategy. Collectively, these actions will lead to more effective implementation and more profitable innovation.
|
| [37] |
陈元志, 陈劲. 社会主义现代化强国视域下的科技创新:历史演进、内涵特征和实现路径[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 40(3):1-18.
|
| [38] |
王高阳, 康鑫宇. 从追随到对冲:中美大国博弈背景下沙特的战略转向[J]. 国际展望, 2024, 16(5):109-129+149-150.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
