Construction and spatial differentiation of an evaluation index system for new quality productive forces from an industrial perspective

Zhang Hao, Qi Tianyi, Liu Lina, Li Qingxue, Li Meishan

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 23-33.

PDF(1459 KB)
PDF(1459 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7) : 23-33. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.07.003  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.07.003

Construction and spatial differentiation of an evaluation index system for new quality productive forces from an industrial perspective

Author information +
History +

Abstract

New quality productive forces provide the intrinsic momentum for achieving high-quality development. Scientifically grasping the current state and evolutionary characteristics of China’s new quality productive forces is the key breakthrough point for developing them in a way that suits local conditions. Based on the theoretical essence of new quality productive forces, this paper employed evolutionary economic geography theory to design a spatial differentiation framework encompassing regional knowledge foundations, technological linkages, and path dependencies. Further, from an industrial perspective, it constructed an evaluation index system for new quality productive forces covering traditional industries, strategic emerging industries, and future industries by utilizing entropy values, kernel density estimation, and the Dagum Gini coefficient. Findings revealed that China’s overall new quality productive forces level rose annually during the observation period, with the eastern region demonstrating a significant developmental advantage over other areas. Strategic emerging industries may represent a “new-quality industrial gap” in enhancing productivity levels. Regarding spatial correlation, polarization phenomena were observed in the levels of new quality productive forces across eastern, central, and western regions. Significant regional heterogeneity characterized the distribution of new quality productive forces levels, with inter-regional disparities between eastern and northeastern regions being the primary driver of widening gaps. These findings contribute to an objective understanding of China’s new quality productive forces development, clarify key directions for regional advancement, and promote coordinated development tailored to each region’s industrial foundations and resource endowments. They will provide actionable pathways for developing new quality productive forces in a context-specific manner.

Key words

new quality productive forces / evaluation indicator system / spatial differentiation / adapting to local conditions

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhang Hao , Qi Tianyi , Liu Lina , et al . Construction and spatial differentiation of an evaluation index system for new quality productive forces from an industrial perspective[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(7): 23-33 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.07.003

References

[1]
Essletzbichler J. Relatedness,industrial branching and technological cohesion in the United States[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3):475-487.
[2]
Boschma R, Frenken K. The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2011, 11(2):295-307.
[3]
王飞, 韩晓媛, 陈瑞华. 新质生产力赋能现代化产业体系:内在逻辑与实现路径[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 46(6):12-19.
Wang Fei, Han Xiaoyuan, Chen Ruihua. New quality productivity empowers the modernization of the industrial system:Internal logic and implementation path[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2024, 46(6):12-19.
[4]
周文, 许凌云. 论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J]. 改革, 2023, 36(10):1-13.
Zhou Wen, Xu Lingyun. On new quality productivity:Connotation,characteristics and key focus points[J]. Reform, 2023, 36(10):1-13.
[5]
李政, 廖晓东. 新质生产力理论的生成逻辑、原创价值与实践路径[J]. 江海学刊, 2023(6):91-98.
Li Zheng, Liao Xiaodong. The generation logic,original value and practice path of the theory of new quality productivity[J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2023(6):91-98.
[6]
杜传忠, 疏爽, 李泽浩. 新质生产力促进经济高质量发展的机制分析与实现路径[J]. 经济纵横, 2023, 39(12):20-28.
Du Chuanzhong, Shu Shuang, Li Zehao. Mechanism analysis and implementation path of new quality productivity in promoting high-quality economic development[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2023, 39(12):20-28.
[7]
胡洪彬. 习近平总书记关于新质生产力重要论述的理论逻辑与实践进路[J]. 经济学家, 2023, 35(12):16-25.
Hu Hongbin. The theoretical logic and practice path of General Secretary Xi Jinping’s important discourse on new quality productivity[J]. Economist, 2023, 35(12):16-25.
[8]
魏枫, 完颜含玥, 焦方义. 新质生产力的“四个之问”[J]. 求是学刊, 2024, 51(4):54-68.
Wei Feng, Wanyan Hanyue, Jiao Fangyi. The“four questions” of new quality productivity[J]. Seeking Truth, 2024, 51(4):54-68.
[9]
王振宇, 逄雯婷. 地方财政金融协同如何提升企业创新:来自科技金融试点与地方债管理改革的证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2024, 39(7):137-146.
Wang Zhenyu, Pang Wenting. How to enhance enterprise innovation through local finance-finance collaboration:Evidence from the pilot of science and technology finance and the reform of local debt management[J]. China Soft Science, 2024, 39(7):137-146.
[10]
胡佳霖, 徐俊. 中国新质生产力:区域差距、动态演进与跃迁趋势[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(21):5-11.
Hu Jialin, Xu Jun. China’s new quality productivity:Regional differences,dynamic evolution and leap - trend[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2024, 40(21):5-11.
[11]
李庆雪, 宋萌萌, 刘丽娜, 等. 制造企业形成新质生产力的组态路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(9):104-113.
Li Qingxue, Song Mengmeng, Liu Lina, et al. Research on configuration pathways for manufacturing enterprises to form new quality productivity[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(9):104-113.
[12]
凌鸿程, 丁雪彬, 阳镇. 数字创新与企业新质生产力:基于市场、技术和管理三重引擎的研究视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2025, 46(9):37-58.
Ling Hongcheng, Ding Xuebin, Yang Zhen. Digital innovation and enterprises’ new-quality productivity:A triple-engine perspective of market,technology,and management[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2025, 46(9):37-58.
[13]
顾昕, 柳鲲鹏. 创新政策与城市新质生产力的形成:基于国家创新型城市试点的准自然实验[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(10):2131-2141.
Gu Xin, Liu Kunpeng. Innovation policy and the formation of urban new quality productivity:A quasi - natural experiment based on the pilot of national innovative cities[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2025, 43(10):2131-2141.
[14]
袁维海, 周健鹏. 数字化转型对企业新质生产力的影响[J]. 华东经济管理, 2024, 38(12):9-20.
Yuan Weihai, Zhou Jianpeng. The impact of digital transformation on enterprises’ new quality productivity[J]. East China Economic Management, 2024, 38(12):9-20.
[15]
韩文龙, 张瑞生, 赵峰. 新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(6):5-25.
Han Wenlong, Zhang Ruisheng, Zhao Feng. Measuring the level of new quality productivity and new growth drivers in China’s economy[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(6):5-25.
[16]
孙丽伟, 郭俊华. 新质生产力评价指标体系构建与实证测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(9):5-11.
Sun Liwei, Guo Junhua. Construction and empirical measurement of an evaluation index system for new quality productivity[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2024, 40(9):5-11.
[17]
周兵, 米英杰, 冉冰. 新质生产力发展水平测度、时空演变与障碍因子诊断[J]. 统计与决策, 2025, 41(5):12-18.
Zhou Bing, Mi Yingjie, Ran Bing. Measurement of new quality productivity development level,spatiotemporal evolution,and diagnostic analysis of obstacle factors[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2025, 41(5):12-18.
[18]
卢江, 郭子昂, 王煜萍. 新质生产力发展水平、区域差异与提升路径[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(3):1-17.
Lu Jiang, Guo Zi’Ang, Wang Yuping. Development level,regional disparities,and enhancement pathways of new quality productivity[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition), 2024, 30(3):1-17.
[19]
王宁, 刘宏伟, 龚宇润. 新质生产力发展水平测度、动态演进与时空收敛特征[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(18):103-108.
Wang Ning, Liu Hongwei, Gong Yurun. Measurement,dynamic evolution,and spatiotemporal convergence characteristics of new quality productivity development level[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2024, 40(18):103-108.
[20]
王奕淇, 张华玮. 数字技术创新对城市新质生产力的影响研究[J/OL]. 科研管理,1-14[2025-06-18]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1567.G3.20250617.1828.004.
Wang Yiqi, Zhang Huawei. Research on the impact of digital technology innovation on urban new quality productivity[J/OL]. Science Research Management,1-14[2025-06-18]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.1567.G3.20250617.1828.004.
[21]
Asheim B T, Boschma R, Cooke P. Constructing regional advantage:Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases[J]. Regional Studies, 2011, 45(7):893-904.
[22]
Strambach S, Klement B. Cumulative and combinatorial micro-dynamics of knowledge:The role of space and place[J]. Geografiska Annaler:Series B,Human Geography, 2013, 95(2):97-114.
[23]
李伟, 贺灿飞. 城市新产业与城市经济增长:演化经济地理学视角[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(6):51-61+173.
Li Wei, He Canfei. New urban industries and urban economic growth:An evolutionary economic geography perspective[J]. Urban DevelopmentStudies, 2020, 27(6):51-61+173.
[24]
张凯煌, 千庆兰. 中国新能源汽车产业创新网络特征及其多维邻近性成因[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(8):2170-2187.
Abstract
随着知识经济的发展和创新驱动发展战略的实施,创新网络及其多维邻近性机制已成为政府和学者共同关注的焦点。利用Ucinet软件,从区域、主体性质等维度,刻画了2009—2014年产业快速发展时期的中国新能源汽车专利创新网络特征。运用PLS-SEM模型,探究全国及不同区域创新网络的多维邻近性影响过程及原因。研究发现:① 与中国新能源汽车产业创新活动集中在大城市和三大城市群不同,其合作创新网络主要集聚在京津冀与长三角地区,珠三角地区的创新网络明显较弱。同时,创新能力欠发达的区域出现了与其数量不匹配的合作创新规模。② 总的来看,全国创新网络呈现“核心-边缘”结构,国家电网是网络中最重要的创新主体。在京津冀,大型国企集团控制网络,“核心-边缘”结构突出,合作创新最活跃,网络外向程度高。在长三角,区域内主体类型混合多样,“核心-边缘”结构突出,合作创新活跃,网络外向程度较高。在珠三角,民营企业是网络的主要主体,区域网络结构松散,合作创新活跃度低,网络外向程度高。③ 从创新网络的多维邻近性成因看,在全国尺度,组织关系与知识搜寻是全国网络形成的两大动力。在京津冀,国电集团强有力推动跨区域网络形成。在长三角,国电系及区域大企业影响网络形成,丰富的知识源推动合作创新发生。在珠三角,地理邻近性对民营企业合作创新影响有限,知识需求推动了跨区域合作。
Zhang Kaihuang, Qian Qinglan. Innovation network characteristics of China’s new energy vehicle industry and the causes of its multidimensional proximity[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(8):2170-2187.
[25]
陈玲, 王晓飞, 付宇航. 制造业企业自生能力与数字化转型路径[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(2):256-265.
Chen Ling, Wang Xiaofei, Fu Yuhang. The self-development capability of manufacturing enterprises and the path of digital transformation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(2):256-265.
[26]
郝汉舟, 徐新创, 左珂怡, 等. 创新要素集聚与产业升级:中介效应和调节效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(11):2357-2368.
Hao Hanzhou, Xu Xinchuang, Zuo Keyi, et al. Innovation element aggregation and industrial upgrading:A study on mediating and moderating effects[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(11):2357-2368.
[27]
Amoroso S, Diodato D, Hall B H, et al. Technological relatedness and industrial transformation:Introduction to the Special Issue[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2023, 48(2):469-475.
This article introduces eleven research articles that connect concepts of technological relatedness and diffusion with the transformation of industrial and innovation systems. These studies focus on the role of knowledge spillovers, regional variations in innovation and performance, and the evolution of new technologies, such as green and digital technologies. Regional capabilities and ability to diversify are key in accelerating the transformation process of existing industries
[28]
邱斌, 吴可心. 以未来产业支撑新质生产力发展:理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 江海学刊, 2024, 67(4):87-95+255.
Qiu Bin, Wu Kexin. Supporting the development of new quality productivity with future industries:Theoretical logic and practical pathways[J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2024, 67(4):87-95+255.
[29]
王钰莹, 原长弘, 张树满. 链主企业关键核心技术创新能力测度及其对新质生产力的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2026, 47(1):80-89.
Wang Yuying, Yuan Changhong, Zhang Shuman. Measurement of key core technological innovation capabilities of lead firms and their impact on new productive forces[J]. Science Research Management, 2026, 47(1):80-89.
[30]
刘晖, 刘轶芳, 乔晗, 等. 我国战略性新兴产业技术创新效率研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(9):2296-2303.
Abstract
采用DEA 模型,以2007 年到2012 年我国28 个省和直辖市的面板数据为研究样本,对我国战略性新兴产业技术创新的综合效率、纯技术效率、规模效率进行了测度.研究表明,我国战略性新兴产业的纯技术效率整体处在较低水平,呈现先上升后下降的过程,波动较大;但规模效率相对较好,一直维持在比较高的水平,且近两年基本维持稳定.研究还发现,我国战略性新兴产业的技术创新效率存在明显的地区不均衡,北京和广东的技术创新效率最高,甘肃、陕西、内蒙古等西南、西北地区的技术创新效率最低,东南沿海和中部地区的技术创新效率位于中间水平,且存在很大上升动力和上升空间.
Liu Hui, Liu Yifang, Qiao Han, et al. Research on technological innovation efficiency in China’s strategic emerging industries[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2015, 35(9):2296-2303.
[31]
王珏, 秦文晋. 中国战略性新兴产业绿色全要素生产率增长的要素源泉及动态演化[J]. 产业经济评论, 2023, 11(4):48-66.
Wang Jue, Qin Wenjin. Sources and dynamic evolution of green total factor productivity growth in China’s strategic emerging industries[J]. Review of Industrial Economics, 2023, 11(4):48-66.
[32]
白恩来, 赵玉林. 产业政策的宏观有效性与微观异质性实证分析[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(9):11-19.
Bai Enlai, Zhao Yulin. An empirical analysis of the macro effectiveness and micro heterogeneity of industrial policies[J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(9):11-19.
[33]
赵观兵, 瞿鑫慧. 科技型中小企业专利组合策略对创新绩效影响研究:动态能力的调节作用[J]. 科技管理学报, 2024, 26(3):84-94.
Zhao Guanbing, Qu Xinhui. The impact of patent portfolio strategies on innovation performance in technology-based SMEs:The moderating role of dynamic capabilities[J]. Journal of Science and Technology Management, 2024, 26(3):84-94.
[34]
武建龙, 鲍萌萌, 杨仲基. 新兴产业颠覆性创新政策组合作用机制研究:基于创新生态系统视角[J]. 中国软科学, 2023, 38(7):44-55.
Wu Jianlong, Bao Mengmeng, Yang Zhongji. Research on the mechanism of policy synergy for disruptive innovation in emerging industries:An innovation ecosystem perspective[J]. China Soft Science, 2023, 38(7):44-55.
PDF(1459 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/