专精特新企业破解“冷启动悖论”的可拓行动框架

谌飞龙; 占思奇; 范公广

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.10.011

PDF(1322 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10) : 103-114. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.10.011 CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2025.10.011

专精特新企业破解“冷启动悖论”的可拓行动框架

作者信息 +

Extension action framework for SRDI enterprises to break the ‘Cold Start Paradox’

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

专精特新企业实现关键零配件国产替代是“补链强链”的重要议题。国产关键零配件市场采用率不足使其难以通过供需循环实现工艺技术迭代优化,造成国产替代“冷启动悖论”。当前主机企业在推动国产零配件迭代优化方面存在协作缺位,亟待探究专精特新企业如何发挥主体能动性,推动供需良性循环。本文运用可拓理论的系统方法论,构建“情景识别-障碍分析-策略生成”行动框架,探析悖论破解路径。研究发现:(1)关键零配件国产替代“冷启动悖论”破解逻辑与复杂产品系统存在本质差异,前者是市场牵引下的技术性能优化,后者是顶层设计驱动的原始创新。(2)遵循“情境适配-障碍解耦-靶向干预”的可拓逻辑,破解悖论需动态识别不同情境。基于主配合作演化阶段和知识权力状态两个维度可识别三种典型情境:“卡位入链-被动服从”“配套跟随-主动博弈”和“创新协同-对等协商”。(3)针对上述情境,企业需克服试用意愿激活、复用决策确认和常用惯例维持三重障碍。其中,围绕感知价值不足、组织满意未达和收益分配失衡三个核心问题构建可拓模型,实施拓展分析与可拓变换,实现对三重障碍的靶向突破。本研究为专精特新企业破解国产替代“冷启动悖论”提供兼具理论系统性与实践操作性的普适解决方案。

Abstract

Domestic substitution of critical components by specialized, refined, distinctive, and innovative (SRDI) enterprises is pivotal for the supply chain reinforcement. Low market adoption rates hinder domestic components from achieving iterative optimization through positive supply-demand feedback loops, resulting ‘cold-start paradox’ in domestic substitution. Currently, host manufacturers exhibit a collaboration gap in driving the iterative optimization of domestic components. There is an urgent need to explore how SDRI enterprises can play a proactive role in fostering a supply-demand virtuous cycle. This study employed the systematic methodology of extenics to construct an action framework of ‘context identification-barrier analysis-strategy generation’, aiming to explore pathways for resolving this paradox. The key findings are as follows: (1) The logic underlying the resolution of the ‘cold-start paradox’ in domestic substitution of critical components differs from that observed in complex product systems. The former is fundamentally a logic of market-driven performance optimization, while the latter is a logic of state-orchestrated original innovation driven by top-down institutional design. (2) Guided by the extenics logic of ‘contextual adaptation-barrier decoupling-targeted intervention’ to resolve the paradox, different contexts must be dynamically identified. Based on two dimensions: the stage of host-supplier co-evolution and the state of knowledge power, three archetypal contexts are identified: ‘niche integration-passive compliance’ ‘complementary following-proactive negotiation’ ‘innovation collaboration-equal consultation’. (3) Addressing the above contexts requires overcoming three core barriers: activating trial willingness, confirming reuse decisions, and sustaining adoption routines. Extension models are constructed to target the core issues of inadequate perceived value, unmet organizational satisfaction, and imbalanced benefit distribution. Applying extension analysis and transformations enables targeted breakthroughs against these three barriers. This research will provide SRDI enterprises with a universally applicable solution for resolving the ‘cold-start paradox’ in domestic substitution, which integrates theory with practice.

导出引用

谌飞龙, 占思奇, 范公广. 专精特新企业破解“冷启动悖论”的可拓行动框架[J]. 科研管理. 2025, 46(10): 103-114 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.10.011

Chen Feilong, Zhan Siqi, Fan Gongguang. Extension action framework for SRDI enterprises to break the ‘Cold Start Paradox’[J]. Science Research Management. 2025, 46(10): 103-114 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.10.011

中图分类号： F204;F279.12;G311

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	董志勇, 李成明. “专精特新”中小企业高质量发展态势与路径选择[J]. 改革, 2021(10): 1-11. DONG Zhiyong, LI Chengming. High quality development trend and path selection of ‘specialized, refined, and innovative’ SMEs[J]. Reform, 2021(10): 1-11. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	罗瑾琏. 算力向数字化生产力转化的三重逻辑[J]. 人民论坛, 2024(2): 19-23. LUO Jinlian. The triple logic of converting computing power into digital productivity[J]. People's Tribune, 2024(2): 19-23. 本文引用 [4]

[3]

杨玲, 田志龙, 李连翔, 等. 促进大中小企业融通创新的政府赋能机制:基于宜昌市依托龙头企业的公共技术服务中心的案例研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2023 (4): 86-97.

YANG

Ling

, TIAN

Zhilong

, LI

Lianxiang

, et al. A government empowerment mechanism for promoting the integration and innovation of large and small enterprises: A case study of Yichang public technology service center based on leading enterprises[J]. China Soft Science, 2023 (4): 86-97.

本文引用 [1]

[4]	欧阳桃花, 曾德麟. 拨云见日:揭示中国盾构机技术赶超的艰辛与辉煌[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37 (8): 194-207. OUYANG Taohua, ZENG Delin. Revealing the difficulty and glory of China's shield tunneling machine technology in catching up with the sun[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37 (8): 194-207. 本文引用 [2]

[5]	王昶, 何琪, 耿红军, 等. 关键核心技术国产替代的逻辑、驱动因素与实现路径[J]. 经济学家, 2022(3): 99-108. WANG Chang, HE Qi, GENG Hongjun, et al. The logic, driving factors, and implementation path of domestic substitution of key core technologies[J]. Economist, 2022 (3): 99-108. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	王欣, 付雨蒙. 国有企业推动国产替代的功能、模式与实现路径[J]. 产业经济评论, 2023(5): 34-53. WANG Xin, FU Yumeng. The function, model and implementation path of state-owned enterprises in promoting domestic substitution[J]. Review of Industrial Economics, 2023(5): 34-53. 本文引用 [1]

[7]

张羽飞, 原长弘. 产学研深度融合突破关键核心技术的演进研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40 (5): 852-862.

摘要

关键核心技术被“卡脖子”背景下，民营制造业领军企业怎样实现产学研深度融合突破关键核心技术成为亟待破解的现实与理论难题。本文以三一集团为例，深入探讨民营制造业领军企业产学研深度融合突破关键核心技术的演进路径，并依据“产学研深度融合——关键核心技术创新能力提升——关键核心技术突破”核心逻辑构建动态演进模型。研究发现：民营制造业领军企业产学研深度融合突破关键核心技术过程中，产学研融合策略经历了“松散型→探索型→利用型→深度融合型”的路径；关键核心技术创新能力遵循“关键核心零部件研发与制造能力→关键核心技术与工艺集成创新能力→关键核心产品整机自研与制造能力→关键核心产品数字化全面创新能力”逐阶提升路径，且存在逆向促进作用；关键核心技术突破遵循“功能性突破→性能性突破→可靠性突破→前沿性突破”的路径。研究结论丰富了产学研深度融合、关键核心技术与能力相关研究，对产学研深度融合突破关键核心技术的实践具有一定启示。

ZHANG

Yufei

, YUAN

Changhong

. Evolutionary research on the deep integration of industry, university and research to break through key core technologies[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, 40(5): 852-862.

本文引用 [1] 摘要

Under the background of lack of "neck-stuck" key core technologies in China, General Secretary Xi has repeatedly pointed out the correct path for breaking through key core technologies through Industry-University-Research (IUR) deep integration. Consequently, research on the evolution mechanism of this process has become an urgent practical and theoretical problem. However, since IUR deep integration and breakthroughs in key core technologies are both recent research hotspots, rigorous academic research just started, only focusing on speeches, news reports, and policy documents. Although some articles have mentioned the important role of IUR deep integration in breaking through key core technologies, there are almost no serious academic discussions on the specific path for breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration. In addition, research on the evolution of key core technologies also follows the general research paradigm of technology evolution, and has not yet cut into the internal structure of key core technologies. Therefore, this paper raises the following research questions: What are the dynamic evolution path and mechanism of private manufacturing leaders’ breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration?Given the research gaps and important practical significance, this paper takes Sany Group as an example, adopts exploratory single-case research design to deeply explore the evolution path of private manufacturing leaders’ breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration, and constructs a dynamic evolution model following core logic of “IUR deep integration — key core technology innovation capability enhancement — key core technology breakthrough”. Results show that: in the process of private manufacturing leaders’ breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration, IUR deep integration strategy undergoes a process of “loose → exploratory → exploitory → deep integration”; key core technology innovation capabilities follow path of “R&D and manufacturing capabilities of key core components → integrated innovation capabilities of key core technologies and process → self-developed and manufacturing capabilities of key core products → comprehensive digital innovation capabilities of key core products”; key core technology breakthroughs follow the path of “function breakthroughs → performance breakthroughs → reliability breakthroughs → frontier breakthroughs”.The main theoretical contributions of this paper are as follows: First, few studies deeply analyze the organizational strategy and evolution path of IUR deep integration. This paper identifies four evolution stages and four strategies of IUR deep integration, and constructs a dynamic evolution model for breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration, enriching research related to IUR deep integration. Second, existing research has not decomposed key core technology innovation capabilities. This paper concludes four key core technology innovation capabilities from the Sany case and identifies the interaction effects of step-by-step improvement and reverse promotion among four key core technology innovation capabilities, enriching research related to key core technology innovation capabilities. Third, existing research does not focus on the evolution mechanism of breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration. This paper explores the concrete evolution path of private manufacturing leaders’ breaking through key core technologies through IUR deep integration, and constructs a dynamic evolution model, enriching research related to evolution path of key core technologies.

[8]

单宇, 刘爽, 马宝龙. 国产替代过程中关键核心技术的适应性重构机制:基于海信集团1969-2022视像技术的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(4): 80-100.

SHAN

, LIU

Shuang

, MA

Baolong

. The adaptive restructuring mechanism of key core technologies in the process of domestic substitution:A longitudinal case study of Hisense group's imaging technology from 1969 to 2022[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(4): 80-100.

本文引用 [1]

[9]

中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组, 曲永义. 产业链链长的理论内涵及其功能实现[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(7): 5-24.

Research Group of Industrial Economics Institute of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, QU Yongyi. Theoretical connotation and functional realization of industrial chain chainleader[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(7): 5-24.

本文引用 [1]

[10]

张贝贝, 尹西明, 陈泰伦, 等. 后发企业与创新联合体共演驱动产业关键核心技术持续突破的机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45 (8): 83-94.

ZHANG

Beibei

, YIN

Ximing

, CHEN

Tailun

, et al. The mechanism of co-evolution of latecomer firms and innovation consortia driving the continuous breakthrough of key core technologies in industries[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(8): 83-94.

本文引用 [1]

[11]

吴欣桐, 梅亮. 新兴市场企业技术突破:基于“结构—过程—产出”的文献述评与中国镜鉴[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, 28 (3): 88-99.

Xintong

, MEI

Liang

. Technological breakthroughs of firms in emerging markets:A literature review based on ‘structure-process-outcome’ framework and insights for China[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2025, 28 (3): 88-99.

本文引用 [3]

[12]	胡晓, 杨德林, 马倩. 政府与市场共演化驱动下中国集成电路产业国产替代路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44 (11): 9-21. HU Xiao, YANG Delin, MA Qian. Research on the domestic substitution path of China's integrated circuit industry driven by the co-evolution of government and market[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(11): 9-21. 本文引用 [2]

[13]	欧阳桃花, 曾德麟. 中国商用客机后发技术追赶模式研究:复杂系统管理视角[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35 (6): 323-334. OUYANG Taohua, ZENG Delin. Research on the latecomer technology catch-up mode of China's commercial aircraft:A complex system management perspective[J]. Management Review, 2023, 35(6): 323-334. 本文引用 [2]

[14]	AMDERSEN P H, CHRISTENSEN P R. Bridges over troubled water: Suppliers as connective nodes in global supply networks[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(9): 1261-1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.04.002 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296304000475 本文引用 [2]

[15]	贾依帛, 苏敬勤, 马欢欢, 等. 全球价值链嵌入下隐形冠军企业知识权力演化机理研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25 (3): 62-74. JIA Yibo, SU Jingqin, MA Huanhuan, et al. Research on the evolution mechanism of knowledge power of invisible champions under the embedding of global value chain[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2022, 25 (3): 62-74. 本文引用 [6]

[16]

赵晶, 孙泽君, 程栖云, 等. 中小企业如何依托“专精特新”发展实现产业链补链强链:基于数码大方的纵向案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(7): 180-200.

ZHAO

Jing

, SUN

Zejun

, CHENG

Qiyun

, et al. How SMEs can rely on‘specialized, refined, and innovative’ development to supplement and strengthen their industrial chains: A longitudinal case study based on digital generosity[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(7): 180-200.

本文引用 [2]

[17]

FRAMBACH

R T

, SCHILLEWAERT

. Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2002, 55(2): 163-176.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296300001521

本文引用 [1]

[18]	YU C S, TAO Y H. Understanding business-level innovation technology adoption[J]. Technovation, 2009, 29(2): 92-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.007 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166497208000886 本文引用 [1]

[19]	CHATTERJEE S, RANA N P, DWIVEDI Y K, et al. Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 170(9): 1-34. 本文引用 [2]

[20]	王昶, 何琪, 耿红军, 等. 关键战略材料国产替代应用的决定性因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44 (12): 93-103. WANG Chang, HE Qi, GENG Hongjun, et al. Research on the determinative factors of domestic substitution application of key strategic materials[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(12): 93-103. 本文引用 [1]

[21]

LEE

, MALERBA

. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(2): 338-351.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733316301408

本文引用 [1]

[22]	STERELNY K. Cooperation, culture, and conflict[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2016, 67(1): 31-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axu024 https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/axu024 本文引用 [1]

[23]	杨春燕, 汤龙. 不相容问题求解的理论、方法与系统研究[J]. 智能系统学报, 2016, 11 (6): 799-806. YANG Chunyan, TANG Long. Theory, method, and system research for solving incompatible problems[J]. CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2016, 11 (6): 799-806. 本文引用 [4]

[24]	李兴森, 陆琳, 许立波. WSR方法论与可拓学的对比分析及事理知识图谱模型研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(5): 152-162. LI Xingsen, LU Lin, XU Libo. Comparative analysis of WSR methodology and Extenics and research on the model of rational knowledge graph[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(5): 152-162. 本文引用 [1]

[25]

王珊珊, 占思奇, 王玉冬. 产业技术标准联盟专利冲突可拓模型与策略生成[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34 (10): 1487-1497.

摘要

产业技术标准联盟是技术标准化的重要载体，与专利活动相关的冲突将影响联盟的稳定性与标准化绩效。将产业技术标准联盟专利冲突划分为对抗性冲突和非对抗性冲突两大类型，提出不同类型冲突的解决思路，并以典型冲突为例，建立了冲突可拓模型和可拓集合，运用转换桥和可拓变换方法生成了冲突解决策略，为我国产业技术标准联盟专利冲突管理提供参考。

WANG

Shanshan

, ZHAN

Siqi

, WANG

Yudong

. Extension model and strategy generation of patent conflict in industrial technology standards alliance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2016, 34 (10): 1487-1497.

本文引用 [1]