关键战略材料国产替代应用的决定性因素研究

王昶 何琪 耿红军 周依芳

科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12) : 93-103.

PDF(1600 KB)
PDF(1600 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12) : 93-103. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2023.12.010
论文

关键战略材料国产替代应用的决定性因素研究

  • 王昶1,何琪1,耿红军1,2,周依芳1
作者信息 +

Research on the decisive factors of domestic substitution application on key strategic materials

  • Wang Chang1, He Qi1, Geng Hongjun1,2, Zhou Yifang1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

国产替代是保障关键战略材料自主可控、安全可靠和增强产业链供应链韧性的有效手段。本文运用扎根理论与大样本实证的混合研究方法对关键战略材料“有材不敢用”的问题展开讨论,识别了关键战略材料国产替代应用的决定性因素,构建并验证了国产替代应用的“购-销-环境”决定性因素模型。研究发现:(1)材料就绪度、供应商信任、转换成本将影响企业能否顺利“买入”国产材料,是关键战略材料国产替代应用的前提条件;(2)需求机会与客户认同将决定企业能否将含国产材料的产品顺利“卖出”,是关键战略材料国产替代应用的重要拉力;(3)政府支持与社会规范为关键战略材料国产替代应用提供了重要的正式制度与非正式制度环境支持,在购销因素与国产替代应用中发挥重要的调节作用。本研究丰富了国产替代应用研究,为推动国产替代进程和提升产业链供应链安全水平提供思路启示。

Abstract

    The global supply chain is facing complex and unprecedented threats due to the trade war and technology decoupling, the bottleneck problem of China′s key strategic materials and the risk of supply chain interruption are increasingly prominent, domestic substitution is an effective means to guarantee the independent control of key strategic materials and enhance the resilience of supply chain. However, the domestic substitution of China′s key strategic materials is facing the dilemma of "having but not using", and the promotion process is seriously hindered. The key to solving this problem is to identify the decisive factors of domestic alternatives adoption on key strategic materials, so it has become an important issue at present. Existing research has explored domestic substitution from the perspective of innovation, commercialization and organizational adoption, and has put forward many original views, but the research on domestic substitution application from the perspective of organizational adoption is relatively insufficient, the discussion on the influencing factors focuses on the single level of technology, organization or environment, and ignores the complexity of domestic substitution.This paper sought to address the question: what are the decisive factors that affect the domestic substitution adoption of key strategic materials? In order to improve the reliability of the research, this paper used the mixed research method of grounded theory and large sample empirical research. The advantage of grounded theory is that it can extract new theories from phenomena or practices, and large sample empirical research can verify the extracted theories, which is applicable to the research issues in this paper. In the first stage, this paper collected the data of seven representative enterprises, extracted the decisive factors and constructed model of the domestic substitution by using the grounded theory. In the second stage, 371 questionnaires were collected in various ways to verify the decisive factors and models. This paper constructed the “purchase-sales-environment” decisive factor model of domestic substitution adoption on key strategic materials, and had the following finding: firstly, material readiness, supplier trust and switching cost are the decisive factors and preconditions that affect whether an enterprise can successfully purchase domestic materials. Among these purchase-related factors, material readiness is the prerequisite of domestic substitution adoption, supplier trust is the key thrust, and switching cost is an important resistance. Secondly, demand opportunity and customer recognition are important pulling forces that determine whether an enterprise can successfully sale products containing domestic materials. Among these sales-related factors, demand opportunity reflects the market prospects and potential of domestic materials, customer recognition is an important condition to reduce the barriers to market entry of domestic products and relieve market pressure. Thirdly, government support and social norms provide formal and informal institutional environment support for domestic substitution adoption, and play an important moderating role. Among these environment-related factors, the government′s support in the application of insurance, subsidies, application demonstration projects and other aspects will help enterprises reduce the cost of domestic substitution adoption, social norms will stimulate enterprises′ positive awareness and provide good environmental support for domestic substitution adoption of key strategic materials.This paper mainly had the following two theoretical contributions: (1) This paper contributes to the research on the influencing factors of domestic substitution. Existing research focuses on the innovation and commercialization of domestic technology, ignoring that domestic substitution is a special and complex organizational adoption behavior. This paper constructs and verifies the "purchase - sales - environment" decisive factor model from the perspective of organizational adoption, breaks through the scope of the existing research on "0 or 1" of domestic materials, identifies the decisive factor of "use" in the process of domestic substitution, and provides an effective explanation for the dilemma of "having but not using". (2) This paper contributes to the research on organizational adoption. Unlike previous studies focusing on digitization, organizational change situations, this paper discusses the domestic substitution adoption of key strategic materials in the context of industrial chain supply chain security, expands the research context of organizational adoption, and provides new insights and evidence for deconstructing the logic of organizational adoption.This paper also provided some ideas for the government to promote the process of domestic substitution and improve the security level of the supply chain. For example, the government needs to reduce the purchase concerns of enterprises about domestic materials, increase the sales opportunities of products with high localization rate, and optimize the external environment for domestic substitution adoption of key strategic materials.

关键词

国产替代应用 / 关键战略材料 / 决定性因素 / 混合研究方法

Key words

domestic substitution adoption / key strategic material / decisive factor / mixed research method

引用本文

导出引用
王昶 何琪 耿红军 周依芳. 关键战略材料国产替代应用的决定性因素研究[J]. 科研管理. 2023, 44(12): 93-103 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2023.12.010
Wang Chang, He Qi, Geng Hongjun, Zhou Yifang. Research on the decisive factors of domestic substitution application on key strategic materials[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(12): 93-103 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2023.12.010

参考文献

[1]于畅, 邓洲.工业化后期国产替代的方向调整与推进策略[J].北京工业大学学报社会科学版, 2021, 21(01):55-62
[2]谢曼, 干勇, 王慧.面向的新材料强国战略研究[J].中国工程科学, 2020, 22(05):1-9
[3]王昶, 何琪, 耿红军, 周依芳.关键核心技术国产替代的逻辑、驱动因素与实现路径[J].经济学家, 2022, (3):99-108
[4]吕铁, 江鸿.从逆向工程到正向设计——中国高铁对装备制造业技术追赶与自主创新的启示[J].经济管理, 2017, 39(10):6-19
[5]贺俊, 吕铁, 黄阳华, 江鸿.技术赶超的激励结构与能力积累:中国高铁经验及其政策启示[J].管理世界, 2018, 34(10):191-207
[6]路风.冲破迷雾——揭开中国高铁技术进步之源[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(09):164-194
[7]LEE K, LIM C.Technological Regimes,Catching-Up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries[J].Research Policy, 2001, 30(3):459-483
[8]付明卫, 叶静怡, 孟俣希, 雷震.国产化率保护对自主创新的影响——来自中国风电制造业的证据[J].经济研究, 2015, 50(02):118-131
[9]ZHANG Y, SUN J, YANG Z, et al.Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, (264):121701-
[10]MADUKU D K, MPINGANJIRA M, DUH H.Understanding mobile marketing adoption intention by South African SMEs: A multi-perspective framework[J].International Journal of Information Management, 2016, 36(5):711-723
[11]VENKATESH V, BROWN S A, BALA H.Bridging the Qualitative-quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems[J].MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(1):21-54
[12]周源.制造范式升级期共性使能技术扩散的影响因素分析与实证研究[J].中国软科学, 2018, (1):19-32
[13]ARVIDSSON A P, MELANDER L.The multiple levels of trust when selecting suppliers- Insights from an automobile manufacturer[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 87:138-149
[14]李随成, 禹文钢.制造商对供应商长期导向的前因作用机理研究[J].管理科学, 2011, 24(06):79-92
[15]OBAL M.Why do incumbents sometimes succeed? Investigating the role of interorganizational trust on the adoption of disruptive technology[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2013, 42(6):900-908
[16]RIJINSOEVER F, BERG J, KOCH J, et al.Smart Innovation Policy:How Network Position and Project composition affect the diversity of an emerging technology[J].Research Policy, 2015, 44(5):1094-1107
[17]周观平, 易宇.新发展格局下提升中国集成电路产业链安全可控水平研究[J].宏观经济研究, 2021, 276(11):58-69
[18]YEH C C, CHEN Y F.Critical success factors for adoption of 3D printing[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 132:209-216
[19]臧树伟, 陈红花.本土品牌厂商创新赶超路径演化研究[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(06):1132-1141
[20]RAHBAUER S, MENAPACE L, MENRAD K, et al.Adoption of green electricity by German small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – a qualitative analysis[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 129:102-112
[21]MAJIDPOUR M.Technological catch-up in complex product systems[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2016, 41:92-105
[22]CAERTELING J, HALMAN J I, DOREE A, et al.Technology Commercialization in Road Infrastructure: How Government Affects the Variation and Appropriability of Technology[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2008, 25(2):143-161
[23]CHENG S, LEE S J, CHOI B.An empirical investigation of users' voluntary switching intention for mobile personal cloud storage services based on the push-pull-mooring framework[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 92:198-215
[24]曹玉玲, 李随成.企业间信任的影响因素模型及实证研究[J].科研管理, 2011, 32(01):137-146
[25]曾敏刚, 林倩, 潘焕雯, 朱佳.信息技术能力、信任与供应链整合的关系研究[J].管理评论, 2017, 29(12):217-225
[26]BURNHAM T A, FRELS J K, MAHAJAN V.Consumer switching costs: A typology,antecedents,and consequences[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2003, 31(2):109-126
[27]WANG S, MAO J Y, ARCHER N.On the performance of B2B e-markets: An analysis of organizational capabilities and market opportunities[J].Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 2012, 11(1-6):59-74
[28]WU F, MAHAJAN V, BALASUBRAMANIAN S.An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on business performance[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2003, 31(4):425-447
[29]NYADZAYO M W, MOHAN M, CASIDY R.Relationship factors and firms' willingness-to-pay: A comparison of east-west settings[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, (91):397-410
[30]LI H, ATUAHENE-GIMA K.Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6):1123-1134
[31]肖振鑫, 高山行.技术驱动、政府推动与企业探索性创新——基于产业竞争范式和制度理论的双重视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(03):46-55
[32]郑馨, 周先波.社会规范是如何激活创业活动的?——来自中国“全民创业”十年的微观证据[J].经济学季刊, 2018, 17(01):189-220
[33]ZHOU W C, YAN D, SUN S L.Climbing the Ladder: Inward Sourcing as an Upgrading Capability in Global Value Chains[J].Research Policy, 2022, 51(3):104439-

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“智能制造关键新材料创新突破的国家战略研究”(18ZDA061,2018.11—2023.12);国家自然科学基金面上项目:“清洁能源技术关键伴生金属可供性约束机制、趋势及干预路径研究”(42071276,2021.01—2024.12);国家自然科学基金重大项目:“新时代战略性关键矿产资源供给安全与管理政策研究”(71991482,2020.01—2024.12);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目:“关键战略材料国产替代的研究:逻辑、机制与路径”(1053320214834,2022.04—2023.12)。

PDF(1600 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/