By conducting differences-in-differences model analysis, whether or not the practice of GEM might improve enterprise innovation is explored. The evaluation index system of enterprise innovation is first constructed, and the data from 51 SMEs and GEM board listed corporations from the year of 2008 to 2010 are collected. The results indicate that the launch of the GEM is unable to significantly lead on to the enterprise innovation and it even has the negative influence in a short term. However, along with the operation and adjustment, the GEM market will turn back to rationality gradually and in turn has an increasing positive influence on enterprise innovation. Thus, it is suggested that the GEM should be treated positively. While constructing the systems of perfect suspension, delisting, transfer boards, and other related institutions, the service target of GEM should be further identified and highlighted. Therefore, it is important to dispel all kinds of misgivings, increase the listed resources, and serve the small and mid-sized innovation enterprises that are at the initial stage of pioneering, so as to ensure the full development of GEM potential function for enhancing enterprise innovation.
Key words
GEM /
enterprise innovation /
differences-in-differences model
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Bernard S.Black,Ronald J.Gilson. Venture Capital And the Structure of Capital Markets:Banks Versus Stock Markets,Journal of Financial Economics[J].1998,47(3):243-277.
[2] Tomas Hellmann & Manju Puri. The Interaction between Product Market and Financing Strategy:The Role of Venture Capital[J].The Review of Financial Studies,2000,13(4):959-984.
[3] 曹政.论风险投资、创业板市场与高新技术产业发展的良性互动[J].当代财经.2000,21(12):44-46.
[4] 吕炜.论风险投资机制的技术创新原理[J].经济研究.2002,48(2):48-56.
[5] 吴江林,柏政成,周孝华.创业企业创新与风险投资最优退出方式选择[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(2):58-63.
[6] 辜胜阻,洪群联,张翔.论构建支持自主创新的多层次资本市场[J].中国软科学.2007,22(8):7-14.
[7] 徐维爽,张庭发,宋永鹏.创业板上市公司成长性及技术创新贡献分析[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报).2012,32(1):63-67.
[8] 李龙筠,谢艺.中国创业板上市公司创新能力评估[J].经济学家.2011,23(2):93-102.
[9] 孙伍琴.金融发展促进技术创新的机制及启示[J],杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版).2008,4(3):15-19.
[10] 樊五勇.风险资本市场研究 [D],暨南大学博士学位论文,2010年.
[11] Jacobsson.S.,C.Oskarsson, J.Philipson. Indicators of technological activities-comparing educational, patent and R&D statistics in the case of Sweden[J].Research Policy.1996.25(4):573-585.
[12] 韩景元,杨忠敏,李荣平,庞更新.企业技术创新能力评价的理论、指标与方法[J].河北科技大学学报.2002,23(3):90-94.
[13] 王伟光,唐晓华.技术创新能力测度方法综述[J].中国利技论坛.2003,19(4):39-42.
[14] 王海威,朱建忠,许庆瑞.技术创新能力及其测度指标研究综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版).2005,51(5):26-30.
[15] 杨大楷,邵同尧.风险投资与创新研究新进展[J].南京社会科学.2010,21(7):1-8.
[16] Lall S. Technological Capabilities and Industrialization [J],World Development.1992. 20(2): 165-186.
[17] 梁莱歆,张焕凤.高科技上市公司R&D投入绩效的实证研究[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版).2005,7(2):232-236.
[18] 孙永祥.所有权、融资结构与公司治理机制[J].经济研究.2000,46(1):45- 53.
[19] 潘雄锋,刘凤朝.中国区域工业企业技术创新效率变动及其收敛性研究[J].管理评论.2010,22(2):59-64.
[20] 李龙筠,刘晓川.资产结构、地区经济与企业创新能力—来自中国创业板市场的证据[J].中央财经大学学报.2011,31(5):45-49.
[21] 汪晓春.企业创新投资决策的资本结构条件[J].中国工业经济.2002,20(10):89-95.
[22] 徐晋涛,陶然,徐志刚.退耕还林:成本有效性、结构调整效应与经济可持续性——基于西部三省农户调查的实证分析[J].经济学(季刊).2004,4(4):139-162.
[23] 周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果:基于双重差分模型的估计[J].经济研究.2005,51(8):44-53.
[24] 聂辉华,方明月,李涛.增值税转型对企业行为和绩效的影响—以东北地区为例[J].管理世界.2009,25(5):17-24.
[25] 黄清.电力行业放松规制改革政策效果的实证研究—基于发电侧数据的双重差分模型检验[J].山西财经大学学报.2009,31(1):49-56.
[26] 李楠,乔榛.国有企业改制政策效果的实证分析—基于双重差分模型的估计[J].数量经济技术经济研究2010,27(2):3-21.
[27] 吴晓求.中国创业板:现状与未来[J].财贸经济.2011,32(4):5-14.
PDF(920 KB)
