Since the reform and opening up, China has experienced nearly 40 years of rapid economic growth, made remarkable achievements, and has become the second largest economy in the world. However, there are still many problems in the economic and social development in China, which restrict the improvement of the quality of economic growth. The construction of innovative cities is an important institutional design to effectively enhance the ability of independent innovation and accelerate the transformation of the mode of economic development. The significance of the construction of innovative cities lies not only in innovation itself, but also in the transformation of economic development mode and long-term high-quality economic development. In 2008, Shenzhen was established as the first innovative pilot city. By 2022, there are 103 innovative pilot cities in China. The construction of innovative cities in China is a gradual reform process of "urban pilot-central summary-urban promotion". The development process has stage characteristics and gradually shows a trend of transformation from specialization to generalization. Does the construction of innovative cities effectively improve the quality of economic growth based on certain achievements? The exploration of this issue is of great significance for the comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative city construction, the optimization of the development path of innovative cities, and the construction of innovative countries.
Numbers of scholars have discussed the construction of innovative cities. Based on the relevant literature, it is found that the construction of innovative cities has had a wide impact on economic and social development. However, few scholars have explored the heterogeneous impact of innovative city construction on the quality of economic growth and its constituent elements. Further analysis of the internal impact mechanism is also urgently needed to be supplemented. This research focused on the relationship between the construction of innovative cities and the quality of economic growth, providing Chinese empirical evidence for "innovation driven development". Specifically, this research used urban panel data to estimate the impact of innovative city pilot policy on the quality of economic growth through the difference-in-differences (DID) method, and further analyzes its internal mechanism and heterogeneity based on the decomposition of components.
The empirical study found that the construction of innovative cities significantly improves the quality of economic growth, and the construction of innovative cities promotes the technological progress and technological efficiency, but inhibits the scale efficiency of cities. A series of robustness tests have verified the above conclusions. Intellectual property protection and institutional environment improvement can strengthen the role of the construction of innovative cities in improving the quality of economic growth, and this role is stronger in eastern regions and cities with lower administrative levels. The construction of innovative cities mainly promotes technological progress through investment structure improvement and innovation incentive effect, and plays a role in technological efficiency through resource allocation optimization and industrial structure upgrading. The industrial competition effect and the entry substitution effect among enterprises are the main channels for the construction of innovative cities to affect scale efficiency.
This study aims to identify the impact of the construction of innovative cities on the quality of economic growth, deepen the understanding of innovation driven theory, enrich relevant research on China′s public policy evaluation. This study also provides new empirical evidence for "innovation driven development" and how to achieve high-quality economic development in the context of China. From the perspective of decomposition of constituent elements, this study deeply analyzes the theoretical mechanism and action path of the impact of innovative city construction on the quality of economic growth. While affirming the policy effect, this study proposes improvement directions for the future development of innovative cities, which has important policy implications for China to accelerate its entry into the forefront of innovative countries.
Key words
innovative city /
quality of economic growth /
total factor productivity (TFP) /
mechanism analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]WANG S, WANG J, WEI C, WANG X, FAN F.Collaborative innovation efficiency: From within cities to between cities——Empirical analysis based on innovative cities in China[J].Growth and Change, 2021, 52(3):1330-1360
[2]闫昊生, 孙久文, 蒋治.创新型城市、所有制差异与企业创新:基于目标考核视角[J].世界经济, 2021, 44(11):75-101
[3]晏艳阳, 王娟, 卢彦瑾.创新型城市试点建设的“以点带面”效应研究[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(07):20-28
[4]ALDER S, SHAO L, ZILIBOTTI F.Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 2016, 21(4):305-349
[5]郭丰, 杨上广, 柴泽阳.创新型城市建设实现了企业创新的“增量提质”吗?——来自中国工业企业的微观证据[J].产业经济研究, 2021, (03):128-142
[6]FANG C, MA H, WANG Z, LI G.The sustainable development of innovative cities in China: Comprehensive assessment and future configuration[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(6):1095-1114
[7]徐换歌, 蒋硕亮.国家创新型城市试点政策的效果以及空间溢出[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(12):2161-2170
[8]崔新蕾, 刘欢.国家创新型城市设立与区域创新能力[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(01):32-40
[9]张华, 丰超.创新低碳之城:创新型城市建设的碳排放绩效评估[J].南方经济, 2021, (03):36-53
[10]王晓红, 张少鹏, 李宣廷.创新型城市建设对城市绿色发展的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(08):1-9
[11]李仁宇, 钟腾龙.创新型城市试点建设的企业出口产品质量效应[J].当代经济科学, 2021, 43(03):44-55
[12]聂飞, 刘海云.国家创新型城市建设对我国FDI质量的影响[J].经济评论, 2019, (06):67-79
[13]王一鸣.百年大变局、高质量发展与构建新发展格局[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(12):1-13
[14]KUMBHAKAR S C, LOVELL C A K.Stochastic frontier analysis[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[15]李启航, 黄璐, 张少辉.国家高新区设立能够提升城市全要素生产率吗?——基于261个地级市TFP分解数据的路径分析[J].南方经济, 2021, (03):54-72
[16]ZHANG H, HUANG L, ZHU Y, SI H, HE X.Does low-carbon city construction improve total factor productivity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(22):11974-
[17]余泳泽, 刘大勇, 龚宇.过犹不及事缓则圆:地方经济增长目标约束与全要素生产率[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(07):26-42
[18]MULIER K, SAMARIN I.Sector heterogeneity and dynamic effects of innovation subsidies: Evidence from Horizon 2020[J].Research Policy, 2021, 50(10):104346-
[19]黎文靖, 郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究, 2016, 51(04):60-73
[20]BARTELSMAN E, HALTIWANGER J, SCARPETTA S.Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection[J].American Economic Review, 2013, 103(1):305-34
[21]UZUNIDIS D.Propaedeutics in the theory of the industrial organisation: the SCP (structure, conduct, performance) model[J].Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 2016, (02):197-215
[22]詹新宇, 崔培培.中国省际经济增长质量的测度与评价——基于“五大发展理念”的实证分析[J].财政研究, 2016, (08):40-53
[23]郭晨, 张卫东.产业结构升级背景下新型城镇化建设对区域经济发展质量的影响——基于PSM-DID经验证据[J].产业经济研究, 2018, (05):78-88
[24]朱光顺, 张莉, 徐现祥.行政审批改革与经济发展质量[J].经济学季刊, 2020, 19(03):1059-1080
[25]张军, 吴桂英, 张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究, 2004, (10):35-44
[26]张红凤, 姜琪, 吕杰.经济增长与食品安全——食品安全库兹涅茨曲线假说检验与政策启示[J].经济研究, 2019, 54(11):180-194
[27]张红凤, 黄璐, 孙承运.政府干预与食品产业发展效率——基于地方政府竞争视角[J].经济与管理研究, 2021, 42(12):125-141
[28]HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P E.Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme[J].The Review of Economic Studies, 1997, 64(4):605-654
[29]王小鲁, 樊纲, 余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M].社会科学文献出版社, 2017.
[30]WANG Xiaolu, FAN Gang, YU Jingwen.Marketization index of China’s provinces: NERI report 2016 [M]. Social Sciences Academic Press, 2017.
[31]李政, 杨思莹.创新型城市试点提升城市创新水平了吗?[J].经济学动态, 2019, (08):70-85
[32]OLLEY G S, PAKES A.The dynamics of productivity in the tele-communications equipment industry[J].Econometrica, 1992, 64(6):1263-1297
[33]干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究, 2011, 46(05):4-16