Digital economy, transaction cost and regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China

Yuan Hang, Zhu Chengliang

Science Research Management ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4) : 19-28.

PDF(401 KB)
PDF(401 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4) : 19-28.

Digital economy, transaction cost and regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China

  • Yuan Hang1, Zhu Chengliang2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

     "Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation" is an important strategy for accelerating the construction of an innovative country, promoting regional innovation and entrepreneurship through the digital economy is a powerful tool for in-depth implementation of the innovation-driven development strategy. At present, China′s economy is in a critical period of transition from a high-speed growth stage to a high-quality development stage. The wide application of digital technologies such as big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence has gradually pushed the society into the era of digital economy, which has become a "new engine" for economic growth and occupies an important position in the national development strategy. The vigorous rise of the digital economy has brought new opportunities to enhance urban innovation and entrepreneurship capabilities, making innovation and entrepreneurship activities that rely on digital technology media to reflect unprecedented openness, borderlessness and strong interaction. It provides support for the comprehensive implementation and in-depth promotion of China′s "Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation" strategy. However, there is no systematic research about the impact of the digital economy on the innovation and entrepreneurship. Then, can the development of the digital economy effectively promote regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China? What is the internal mechanism? And will there be differentiated impacts due to the differences in regional distribution, city level and other factors? The answer to these questions will be the focus of the following research in this paper. Based on the panel data of 281 prefecture-level cities in China from 2005 to 2019, this paper systematically examines the impact of the digital economy on regional innovation and entrepreneurship. The research found that: (1) The digital economy plays a significant role in promoting regional innovation and entrepreneurial in China. This promotion is still established after a series of endogenous tests and robustness tests, which affirms the positive impact of the digital economy on innovation and entrepreneurship and provides support for the in-depth implementation of innovation and entrepreneurship in China from the development of digital economy, which will lay a solid foundation for accelerating China rise to the forefront of the world′s innovative countries; (2) The mechanism test shows that the digital economy promotes regional innovation and entrepreneurship by reducing transaction costs, thereby smoothing the flow of factors, suppressing resource mismatches, and promoting regional innovation and entrepreneurship. It provides a new explanation from the aspect of transaction cost of the digital economy to promote innovation and entrepreneurship in the perspective of institutional economics; (3) This paper examines the different influences of digital economy on the regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China from three aspects: regional heterogeneity, city-level heterogeneity and innovation and entrepreneurship intensity heterogeneity. And the heterogeneity test shows that the digital economy has a stronger effect on promoting the innovation and entrepreneurship activities in southern cities, general-level cities and lower-level innovation and entrepreneurship cities. It is necessary to attach great importance to the further differentiation of the development of the digital economy on the innovation and entrepreneurship between northern and southern cities.Based on the new development stage and new development pattern, in the face of the complex and severe international and domestic economic situation, in order to further build China into a strong country both in the digital economy and innovation and entrepreneurship, and create a "new benchmark" for driving regional innovation and entrepreneurship with the digital economy, combining with the above research conclusions of this paper, some policy implications are put forward as follows: First, vigorously promote the development of the digital economy, release the positive driving effect of the digital economy on regional innovation and entrepreneurship, and provide strategic support to enter the forefront of the world′s innovative countries at an early date. Second, strengthen the effect of the digital economy in reducing transaction costs, accelerate the free flow of information and other resources, optimize the allocation of innovation and entrepreneurship resources, and continuously enhance regional innovation and entrepreneurship capabilities. Finally, attach great importance to the development gap between the north and the south of the digital economy, strengthen the positive role of the digital economy in promoting the balanced development of innovation and entrepreneurship, and effectively ensure the comprehensive, sufficient, and balanced driving role of the digital economy in regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China.

Key words

digital economy / innovation and entrepreneurship / transaction cost / north-south gap

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yuan Hang, Zhu Chengliang. Digital economy, transaction cost and regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(4): 19-28

References

[1] Yoo Y., Henfridsson O., Lyytinen K. The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735,1002,1004,1008.
[2] 许宪春,张美慧.中国数字经济规模测算研究——基于国际比较的视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(05):23-41.
[3] 王玉,张占斌.数字经济、要素配置与区域一体化水平[J].东南学术,2021(05):129-138.
[4] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(10):65-76.
[5] 韩璐,陈松,梁玲玲.数字经济、创新环境与城市创新能力[J].科研管理,2021,42(04):35-45.
[6] 李斌,田秀林,张所地,赵华平.城市创新能力评价及时空格局演化研究[J].数理统计与管理,2020,39(01):139-153.
[7] 李政,杨思莹.创新型城市试点提升城市创新水平了吗?[J].经济学动态,2019(08):70-85.
[8] 韩先锋,宋文飞,李勃昕.互联网能成为中国区域创新效率提升的新动能吗[J].中国工业经济,2019(07):119-136.
[9] David B A., Heger D., Veith T. Infrastructure and Entrepreneurship[J]. Small Business Economics, 2015, 44(2):219-230.
[10] Paunov C., Rollo V. Has the Internet Fostered Inclusive Innovation in the Developing World? [J]. World Development, 2016, 78: 587-609.
[11] 张旭亮,史晋川,李仙德,张海霞.互联网对中国区域创新的作用机理与效应[J].经济地理,2017,37(12):129-137.
[12] 刘洋,董久钰,魏江.数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J].管理世界,2020,36(07):198-217+219.
[13] 邹宝玲,李华忠.交易费用、创新驱动与互联网创业[J].广东财经大学学报,2016,31(03):26-33.
[14] Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, John V R. The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on firm organization[J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(12):2859-2885.
[15] Cope J. Entrepreneurial Learning from Failure: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2011, 26(6):604-623.
[16] 辜胜阻,李睿.以互联网创业引领新型城镇化[J].中国软科学,2016(01):6-16.
[17] 周广肃,樊纲.互联网使用与家庭创业选择——来自CFPS数据的验证[J].经济评论,2018(05):134-147.
[18] 张勋,万广华,张佳佳,何宗樾.数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J].经济研究,2019,54(08):71-86.
[19] Teece D J. Profiting from Innovation in the Digital Economy: Enabling Technologies, Standards, and Licensing Models in the Wireless World[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(8):1367-1387.
[20] 唐松,伍旭川,祝佳.数字金融与企业技术创新——结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异[J].管理世界,2020,36(05):52-66+9.
[21] Nambisan, S., Lyytinen K., Majchrzak A., Song M. Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017,41(1):223-238.
[22] Malone T W., Crowston K. The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 1994, 26(1): 87-119.
[23] Acemoglu D., Antràs P., Helpman E. Contracts and Technology Adoption[J]. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(3): 916-943.
[24] 石大千,李格,刘建江.信息化冲击、交易成本与企业TFP——基于国家智慧城市建设的自然实验[J].财贸经济,2020,41(03):117-130.
[25] Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2019,33(2):3-29.
[26] 张永恒,王家庭.数字经济发展是否降低了中国要素错配水平?[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(09):62-71.
[27] 韩长根,张力.互联网是否改善了中国的资源错配——基于动态空间杜宾模型与门槛模型的检验[J].经济问题探索,2019(12):43-55.
[28] 赵彦飞,李雨晨,陈凯华.国家创新环境评价指标体系研究:创新系统视角[J].科研管理,2020,41(11):66-74.
[29] 张晓波, 2019, "中国区域创新创业指数", https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/PEFDAS, 北京大学开放研究数据平台.
[30] 戚聿东,刘翠花,丁述磊.数字经济发展、就业结构优化与就业质量提升[J].经济学动态,2020(11):17-35.
[31] 郭峰,王靖一,王芳,孔涛,张勋,程志云.测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征[J].经济学(季刊),2020,19(04):1401-1418.
[32] 黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济,2019(08):5-23.
[33] 杨慧梅,江璐.数字经济、空间效应与全要素生产率[J].统计研究,2021,38(04):3-15.
[34] Nunn N, Qian N. US Food Aid and Civil Conflict[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(6):1630-1666.
[35] Milgrom P., Roberts J. The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization[J]. The American Economic Review, 1990, 80(3): 511-528.
[36] 吴海民,吴淑娟,陈辉.城市文明、交易成本与企业“第四利润源”——基于全国文明城市与民营上市公司核匹配倍差法的证据[J].中国工业经济,2015(07):114-129.
[37] 鲁桐,党印.投资者保护、行政环境与技术创新:跨国经验证据[J].世界经济,2015,38(10):99-124.
[38] 袁航,朱承亮.智慧城市是否加速了城市创新?[J].中国软科学,2020(12):75-83.
[39] Coase R H. The Nature of the Firm[J]. Economica, 1937, 4(16):386-405.
[40] Williamson O E. Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations[J]. The American Economic Review, 1973, 63(2):316–25.
[41] Williamson O E. The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations[J]. The American Economic Review, 1971,61(2):112-123.
[42] Williamson O E. Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1979, 22(2):233-263.
[43] 李寿喜.产权、代理成本和代理效率[J].经济研究,2007(01):102-113.
[44] 王进猛,沈志渔.外资进入方式对交易成本的影响:实证检验及政策建议[J].中国工业经济,2010(07):66-73.
[45] 夏杰长,刘诚.行政审批改革、交易费用与中国经济增长[J].管理世界,2017(04):47-59.
[46] 方竹兰, 王子龙. 论中国互联网产业的发展对交易费用的影响[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2016(03):39-49.
[47] Wallis J J., North D., Growth L. Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970[J]. In Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth[C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
[48] 汪大海.中国社会组织交易费用测算的实证研究——基于2007—2011的数据分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2013,13(01):96-102+140.
[49] 王小鲁,樊纲,余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.
[50] 卢现祥,朱迪.中国制度性交易成本测算及其区域差异比较[J].江汉论坛,2019(10):31-40.
[51] 盛来运,郑鑫,周平,李拓.我国经济发展南北差距扩大的原因分析[J].管理世界,2018,34(09):16-24.
PDF(401 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/