As an important academic exchange platform in the field of management science, Science Research Management has launched frontier topics since 2018 in line with the domestic and international situation, and responded actively to the latest development strategy of the country, which has continuously added topics that are frontier, innovative and practical. This paper adopts the content analysis method to systematically sort out the front topic selection solicitation of Science Research Management, and compares it with international research, in order to explore the path to improve the academic influence of frontier topic selection and the value of academic research results under topic selection, so as to put forward the future development direction and suggestions of the journal. The findings are as follows: (1) Based on the in-depth analysis of the latest national development strategy, Science Research Management added frontier topics such as national scientific and technological security, regional innovation ecosystem construction, basic research and original innovation ability, guided scholars to take China′s "situation" as the basis of framework construction and research assumptions based on the urgent practical problems to be solved in China, analyzed the imperfect national scientific and technological security system, weak regional innovation ability and carried out a forward-looking analysis on problems such as insufficient original innovation ability. (2) The frontier topics proposed by Science Research Management, which makes full use of China′s institutional advantages, are of great significance to the innovation of management theory with Chinese characteristics. However, the research results under the topic did not fully achieve the research goal of building a perfect theoretical system based on the situation with Chinese characteristics. The first reason is that the practice and problems of management with Chinese characteristics are complex and diverse, and it is difficult to condense the theory to meet the requirements of science and universality as well as Chinese characteristics. Secondly, the existing research of Science Research Management mainly takes the western theory as the underlying structure to support the development of the localization theory system, and less considers the elements with Chinese characteristics. However, compared with the western countries, the embedded national situation, social culture and institutional environment of China′s enterprise innovation management practice are different, so the existing theoretical basis lacks a certain fit with the management practice with Chinese characteristics. (3) In the future, on the one hand, Science Research Management can strengthen the sharing and dissemination of frontier topics and high-quality research results by expanding the publicity channels of frontier topics, setting up research columns on frontier topics, and building display positions for innovative results of topics, so as to attract more scholars to understand and comprehensively and deeply analyze the major problems related to management science in the development process of China behind frontier topics. At the same time, guiding scholars to build a perfect and more national characteristic management innovation theoretical system based on China′s national conditions and enterprise characteristic management practice to guide the development of local enterprises. On the other hand, Science Research Management still needs to go deeper into the local institutional environment and cultural background, and dig out topics that are more of China′s practical significance and can fully reflect the times and frontier nature of academic research. At the same time, Science Research Management is supposed to constantly improve the quality of topics and guide scholars to embed China′s unique situational characteristics into research design, so as to provide original management theory support with academic value for the high-quality innovation and development of local enterprises. Although there are shortcomings in this paper, the more important significance lies in, on the one hand, analyzing the frontier topics of Science Research Management and the current situation of academic research under international related topics, clarifying the differences in research direction between domestic and foreign scholars under the guidance of different situations, and inspiring more scholars to realize that China′s unique institutional situation can give birth to a theoretical system with more characteristics of China′s national conditions, thus attracting scholars to embed China′s unique situation characteristics into research designs. On the other hand, combined with the Chinese situation, this paper puts forward the research prospect, guides scholars to pay attention to the emerging new problems and phenomena, takes the practical problems to be solved in China as the research breakthrough, and provides constantly the frontier theory rooted in Chinese management practice for the field of Chinese management science.
Key words
Science Research Management /
forward-looking research /
frontier topics /
local situation /
management science
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 李克强. 政府工作报告[N]. 人民日报, 2019-03-17(001).
Li Keqiang. Report on the work of the government[N]. People's Daily, 2019-03-17(001).
[2] 张璐,梁丽娜,苏敬勤,张强,长青. 破茧成蝶:创业企业如何突破能力的刚性束缚实现进阶?[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(06):189-201+253.
Zhang Lu, Liang Lina, Shu Jingqin, Zhang Qiang, Chang Qing. Breaking cocoon into a butterfly: How entrepreneurial enterprises break through the rigid constraints of the ability to achieve progress?[J]. Management World, 2020,36(06):189-201+253.
[3] 杨祎,刘嫣然,李垣. 替代或互补:人工智能应用管理对创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021,42(04):46-54.
Yang Yi, Liu Yanran, Li Yuan. Substitution or complementation: The impact of AI application and management on innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2021,42(04):46-54.
[4] 李兰冰,刘秉镰. “十四五”时期中国区域经济发展的重大问题展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(05):36-51+8.
Li Lanbing, Liu Binglian. Prospect for major issues of China's regional economic development during the 14th five-year plan period[J]. Management World, 2020,36(05):36-51+8.
[5] 张璐,侯雪茹,王科唯,张强,贾依帛. 跨越关系无效的壁垒:企业网络位置动态构建机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(06):245-255.
Zhang Lu, Hou Xueru, Wang Kewei, Zhang Qiang, Jia Yibo. Crossing the barrier of ineffectiveness of relationship: A study of dynamic construction mechanism of enterprise network location[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(06):245-255.
[6] 王萍,马萍,张璐. 凝心聚力谋发展,继往开来续华章——纪念《科研管理》期刊创刊四十周年[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(01):1-11.
Wang Ping, Ma Ping, Zhang Lu. Collaborating to progress and extending to prosper——In commemoration of the 40th anniversary of Science Research Management[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(01):1-11.
[7] 张璐,耿燕男,王萍,龚宇,郝晓燕,刘艳秋. 《科研管理》期刊创刊四十年研究评述[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(12):1-21.
Zhang Lu, Geng Yannan, Wang Ping, Gong Yu. A review on the hot topics of research in Science Research Management in the past 40 years[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(12):1-21.
[8] 周锴,崔淑妮. 高校院系科研保密工作要处理好的几种关系[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(11):284-288.
Zhou Kai, Cui Shuni. Several relations which should be handled in the confidentiality of scientific research in colleges and unviersities[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(11):284-288.
[9] 张静一,刘梦. 凝聚、吸引、培养——论国家重点实验室人才培养[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(07):271-274.
Zhang Jingyi, Liu Meng. Gathering, attracting and training——A study of personnel training in state key laboratories[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(07):271-274.
[10] Moody G D, Siponen M, Pahnila S. Toward a unified model of information security policy complianc[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2018,42(1):285-311.
[11] Palomeras N, Wehrheim D. The strategic allocation of inventors to R&D collaborations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020,42(1):144-169.
[12] Evans S W, Leese M, Rychnovska D. Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration[J]. Social Studies of Science, 2021,51(2):189-213.
[13] Torten R, Reaiche C, Boyle S. The impact of security awarness on information technology professionals’ behavior[J]. Computers & Security, 2018,79(1):68-79.
[14] Smith F L. Quantum technology hype and national security[J]. Security Dialogue, 2020,51(5):499-516.
[15] 张斌,沈能. 集聚外部性、异质性技术和区域创新效率[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(08):49-59.
Zhang Bin, Shen Neng. Agglomeration externalities, heterogeneous technology and regional innovation efficiency[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(08):49-59.
[16] 雷淑珍,高煜,刘振清. 政府财政干预、异质性FDI与区域创新能力[J]. 科研管理, 2021,42(02):40-51.
Lei Shuzhen, Gao Yu, Liu Zhenqing. Government financial intervention, heterogeneous FDI and regional innovation capability[J]. Science Research Management, 2021,42(02):40-51.
[17] Pierrakis Y, Saridakis E. The role of venture capitalists in the regional innovation ecosystem: A comparison of networking patterns between private and publicly backed venture capital funds[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2019,44(3):850-873.
[18] Huang H. The effect of the small-firm dominated ecology on regional innovation[J]. Annals of Regional Science, 2020,65(3):703-725.
[19] Siddharth V, Kim P H. Gimme shelter or fade away: The impact of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem quality on venture survival[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2020,28(4):827-854.
[20] Carayannis E G, Grigoroudis E, Campbell D F G, Meissner D, Stamati D. The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models[J]. R&D Management, 2018,48(1):148-162.
[21] Nieth L, Benneworth P, Charles D, Fonseca L, Rodrigues C, Salomaa M, Stienstra M. Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: Reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes[J]. European Planning Studies, 2018,26(11):2147-2166.
[22] 张勋. 行业特色型高校基础科研成效研究——以北京交通大学为例[J]. 科研管理, 2019,40(12):323-326.
Zhang Xun. A research on the effectiveness of basic scientific research of industry——specific universities by taking Beijing Jiaotong University as an example[J]. Science Research Management, 2019,40(12):323-326.
[23] 乔望,徐帅,杨小平. 北京化工大学十五年科学基金资助情况回顾与分析[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(03):273-279.
Qiao Wang, Xu Shuai, Yang Xiaoping. A review and analysis of NSFC funding in Beijing University of Chemical Technology in the past 15 years[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(03):273-279.
[24] 张赤东. 企业技术创新项目经费支出调查分析:以创新型企业为例[J]. 科研管理, 2020,41(02):1-10.
Zhang Chidong. A survey of the enterprise technology innovation project fund expenditure:A case of innovation——oriented enterprises in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(02):1-10.
[25] Banal-Estanol A, Macho-Stadler I, Perez-Castrillo D. Endogenous matching in university-industry collaboration: Theory and empirical evidence from the united kingdom[J]. Management Science, 2018,64(4):1591-1608.
[26] Bikard M, Vakili K, Teodoridis F. When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity[J]. Organization Science, 2019,30(2):426-445.
[27] Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A. The decline of science in corporate R&D[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018,39(1):3-32.
[28] Jung E Y, Liu X L. The different effects of basic research in enterprises on economic growth: Income-level quantile analysis[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2019,46(4):570-588.
[29] Akcigit U, Hanley D, Serrano-Velarde N. Back to basics: Basic research spillovers, innovation policy, and growth[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2020,88(1):1-51.
PDF(406 KB)
