The operational efficiency of the regional innovation ecosystem in China: A study based on the perspective of innovation value chain

Science Research Management ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 11-19.

PDF(431 KB)
PDF(431 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 11-19.

The operational efficiency of the regional innovation ecosystem in China: A study based on the perspective of innovation value chain

  • Chen Yizao1, Huang Shihua2, Wang Shengyuan3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

    With today′s society entering the era of a knowledge economy, innovation has become an essential driving force to promote economic development, and it is closely tied to national prosperity and people′s happiness. Innovation ability is the critical competitive force of a country′s comprehensive national strength, which can control economic development, optimize the economic structure, and promote sustainable development. In China, it can be seen that the creation of new knowledge, technologies, and products has always been encouraged. Subsequently, the research on regional innovation has been paid more attention by researchers. As a significant driving force to promote China′s high-quality economic growth, the regional innovation ecosystem′s coordinated and effective operation also guarantees the modernization of China′s system and capacity for governance. In comparison, regional innovation′s framework and operation are rarely explored from systematic ecology in some research. In essence, regional innovation is an ecological problem. The effective operation of regional innovation depends on the cooperation and mutual benefit among various elements. Collaboration and mutual help among different elements play an essential role in the effective operation of regional innovation, which will cause the shortboard effect of improving regional innovation ability due to the lack and lag of any element. As a result, it will influence the optimal allocation of regional innovation resources due to the neglect of this problem, which quickly causes the dilemma of regional innovation.
    Based on the above analyses, this paper starts from the perspective of the innovation value chain. It systematically constructs a regional innovation ecosystem integration framework which includes four innovation elements: policy innovation environment - original innovation research and development - technology innovation application - technology innovation service. On this basis, the Malmquist index method is used to conduct a dynamic empirical evaluation on the operation efficiency of the regional innovation ecosystem in China from the perspective of input and output during 2014-2018, and the sensitivity analysis of the influencing factors of input dimension is also carried out. The results indicate that: (1) From 2014 to 2018, China′s regional innovation ecosystem′s operation efficiency showed stable growth, with an average annual increase of 9.7%. After 2016, the technical efficiency decreased, mainly due to the impact of scale efficiency changes. (2) The operation efficiency of the innovation ecosystem in eastern China is closer to the optimization frontier, followed by the central and western regions. However, the inter-provincial innovation ecosystem′s efficiency varies greatly, mainly caused by the significant difference in technological change index among provinces. The change index of technological progress in each area shows a closer trend to total factor productivity. (3) The various sensitivity of each province region to different resource input exists. Some problems are the redundancy of innovation input resources or poor management of distribution to another degree. 
    To ensure the steady growth of the operation efficiency of China′s regional innovation ecosystem,the following suggestions are put forward: (1) Recognize the gap of innovation strength with other provinces and strengthen the cooperation between regions. (2) Allocate input resources reasonably, enhance the efficiency of resource allocation. (3) Encourage technological progress, and improve the scientific research management system. 
    In terms of the possible contribution of this thesis, it lies in the following aspects: Firstly, based on the perspective of the innovation value chain, this paper proposes an explanatory framework for analyzing the operational framework of the regional innovation ecosystem, which enriches the components and transmission path of regional innovation ecosystem from the theoretical level. Secondly, the Malmquist index method is used to measure efficiency and analyze China′s regional innovation ecosystem′s heterogeneity from 2014 to 2018. Furthermore, we test the sensitivity of input resources from the perspective of resource allocation, which will improve the collaborative operation efficiency of China′s regional innovation ecosystem and optimize the allocation of regional innovation resources.

Key words

regional innovation ecosystem / operational efficiency / total factor productivity / sensitivity analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
The operational efficiency of the regional innovation ecosystem in China: A study based on the perspective of innovation value chain[J]. Science Research Management. 2022, 43(7): 11-19

References

[1] 马大来,陈仲常,王玲.中国区域创新效率的收敛性研究:基于空间经济学视角[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(01):71-78.
[2] 邵云飞,唐小我.中国区域技术创新能力的主成份实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2005(03):71-76.
[3] 郑雨苹,张良强,郑建锋.福建省区域科技创新能力实证评价与分析[J].科技管理研究,2010,30(20):59-63+58.
[4] 姜文仙.广东省区域科技创新能力评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(08):75-79.
[5] 赵聚辉,黄诗华.基于超效率DEA和Malmquist指数的中国科技研发效率评价研究[J].宏观经济研究,2019(09):123-129.
[6] 刘明广.区域创新系统绩效评价的影响因素实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2013,32(07):52-59.
[7] 周文泳,项洋.中国各省市区域创新能力关键要素的实证研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(S1):29-35.
[8] 张斌,沈能.集聚外部性、异质性技术和区域创新效率[J].科研管理,2020,41(08):49-59.
[9] 陈邑早,于洪鉴. 企业盈利模式运行效果评价体系构建——以服装产业为例[J]. 财经理论研究,2019(01):76-86.
[10] 诸波,干胜道. 市场竞争程度、经营战略与业绩评价指标选择[J]. 会计研究,2015(02):51-57+94.
[11] 潘煜,高丽,张星,万岩. 中国文化背景下的消费者价值观研究——量表开发与比较[J]. 管理世界,2014(04):90-106.
[12] Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B. Cooperative R&D and firm performance[J]. Research policy, 2004, 33(10): 1477-1492.
[13] 陈春晖,曾德明. 我国自主创新投入产出实证研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2009,21(01):18-23.
[14] Malmquist S. Index numbers and indifference surfaces[J].Trabajos de estadística,1953, 4(2):209-242.
[15] Caves D W, Christensen L R, Diewert W E. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity[J].Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,1982:1393-1414.
[16] F?re R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, et al. Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach[J].Journal of productivity Analysis,1992, 3(1-2):85-101.
PDF(431 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/