The new product development (NPD) project is a complex system involving customer needs, product functions and components, organization and other different knowledge fields. These domains or fields interact and influence each other. NPD is undergoing a transformation from "technology-centered" to "customer-centered". Hence, how to integrate customer knowledge into the product development and innovation process has become more and more important. The knowledge graph method related to big data can more objectively and comprehensively analyze the dependency relationship between different domains than traditional methods and dependency structure matrix (DSM) is a useful tool to analyze the relationship between multiple knowledge domains. The knowledge graph method uses the visual method to identify and construct the relationship between entities and attributes, which can more truly show the relationship between entities in the real world.
Accurate identification of customer needs is basic challenge for developing new products. Knowledge graph related to big data technology can effectively solve this problem. Based on information such as customers′ online behavior, knowledge graph technology can accurately capture customers′ needs and their priorities. At the same time, the knowledge graph can more comprehensively and visually reflect the complex relationships among multiple knowledge domains, such as customer needs, products and organizations involved in the research and development project, and quantify the internal and external relationships of each domain, thus greatly improve the accuracy of data and NPD project management efficiency. However, previous studies on knowledge graph mainly focus on the technical aspects such as how to construct the knowledge graph, but ignore the application of knowledge graph in NPD projects.
Thus, this paper proposes the NPD knowledge graph and combines it with dependency structure matrix (DSM) to identify the dependence strength among different domains in NPD projects. First, according to the relationship between customer needs and customers in the NPD knowledge graph, this paper builds models to measure the priority of customer needs. We measure the weight of customer needs according to the number of links between customer needs and customer nodes. Next, combing the DSM and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method, this paper builds models to derive the dependency strength between functions through the "demand-function" QFD. The dependency between components includes direct and indirect dependency relationship. Then, the function-product DMM (Domain Mapping Matrix) is built to further analyze the dependency between elements in the function and product domains. And the "function-product" MDM (multi-domain matrix) is established through integrating the functional DSM, the product DSM, and function-product DMM. Using the "function-product" MDM, this paper builds models to derive the dependency strength between components through known DSM and MDM. Finally, to improve the algorithm′s stability and reduce the management complexity through the clustering method, this paper presents a two-stage clustering method based on minimizing the Weighted Average Entropy (WAE) which includes External Cluster Average Entropy (ECAE) and Internal Cluster Average Entropy (ICAE). The information entropy represents the order degree of information coordination between elements of internal cluster or external cluster and it is related with the possibility of information exchange.
An industrial example is used to illustrate the proposed method and model. The results reinforce several managerial practices but also yield new insights, such as how to measure the priority of customer needs, how to derive the dependency strength between components using the "function-product" MDM, and how to clustering the organization based on minimizing the WAE. The example results show that the proposed method can reduce the coordination complexity between clusters and improve the algorithm′s stability.
Key words
research and development project management /
knowledge graph /
dependency structure matrix (DSM) /
multi-domain matrix (MDM) /
integrated management
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]Wu L, Hitt L, Lou B.Data Analytics,Innovation,and Firm Productivity[J].Management Science, 2020, 66(5):1783-1785
[2]Tsan‐Ming Choi, Wallace S W, Wang Y.Big Data Analytics in Operations Management[J].Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(10):1868-1883
[3]Eppinger S.D., Browning T.R. Design structure matrix methods and applications [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
[4]宁连举, 孙中原, 刘茜.基于知识图谱的顾客契合研究热点与趋势评述[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(12):213-224
[5]Feng Q, George Shanthikumar J.How Research in Production and Operations Management May Evolve in the Era of Big Data[J].Production & Operations Management, 2017, 27(9):1670-1684
[6]杨青, 武高宁, 王丽珍.大数据:数据驱动下的工程项目管理新视角[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(3):710-719
[7]Wang W, Stewart K.Spatiotemporal and semantic information extraction from Web news reports about natural hazards[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2015, 50:30-40.[J].Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2015 , 50(mar.):30-40
[8]Guanghui Z, Chao Z, Fengtian C, et al.Graph-based knowledge reuse for supporting knowledge-driven decision-making in new product development[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(23):7187-7203
[9]高长元, 胡艳玲, 何晓燕.面向需求漂移的大数据联盟可拓服务模型[J].科研管理, 2020, 41(07):221-229
[10]Wang Z, Chen C H, Zheng P, et al.A graph-based context-aware requirement elicitation approach in smart product-service systems[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59(2):635-651
[11]Kim H.Towards a sales assistant using a product knowledge graph[J].Journal of Web Semantics, 2017, 46-47(oct.):14-19
[12]Teodoridis F.Understanding Team Knowledge Production: The Interrelated Roles of Technology and Expertise[J].Management Science, 2017, 64(8):1-24
[13]杨青, 吕佳芮, 索尼亚.基于设计结构矩阵的复杂研发项目建模与优化研究进展[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(4):989-1002
[14]杨青, 唐尔玲.研发项目产品与流程架构的跨领域集成与优化[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(6):1525-1532
[15]Maurer M.Structural awareness in complex product design [D]. München: Technischen Universit?t München, 2007.
[16]Baldwin C, MacCormack A, Rusnak J.Hidden structure: using network methods to map system architecture[J].Research Policy, 2014, 43(8):1381-1397
[17]Wang R, Huang R, Qu B.Network-based analysis of software change propagation[J].The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 14(3):713-730
[18]杨青, 郑璐, 索尼亚.研发项目中“团队-功能-产品”多领域集成与组织聚类研究[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6):1557-1565
[19]Alexander C.Notes on the synthesis of form [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
[20]Malliaros F D, Vazirgiannis M.Clustering and community detection in directed networks: a survey[J].Physics Reports, 2013, 533(4):95-142
[21]Li X, Guo L.Constructing affinity matrix in spectral clustering based on neighbor propagation[J].Neurocomputing, 2012, 97(1):125-130
[22]Qiao Y, Fricker J D, Labi S.Quantifying the Similarity between Different Project Types Based on Their Pay Item Compositions: Application to Bundling[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2019, 145(9):1-5
[23]Qing Yang, Chen Shan, Bin Jiang, Na Yang, Tao Yao.Managing the Complexity of Product Development Projects from the Perspective of Customer Needs and Entropy[J].Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 2018, 26(4):328-340
[24]A.Mur, R. Dormido, N. Duro, S. Dormido-Canto, and J. Vega. Determination of the optimal number of clusters using a spectral clustering optimization[J]. Expert System Application, 2016, 65:304-314.[J].Expert System Application, 2016, 65(dec.):304-314