Organizational ambidexterity is an important frontier field of management research in China and an important horizon to explore the management problems in emerging economic countries for the international academic community. However, there is few high-quality literatures that systematically combs the knowledge network and dynamic evolution trend of it in the Chinese context. There is a lack of in-depth comparison and analysis of the similarities and differences of the relevant studies in China and abroad. The landmark achievements, academic groups, research hotspots and dynamic evolution have not been presented scientifically. The study collects the Chinese contextual organizational ambidextrous research papers from CSSCI and the core database of Web of Science，using bibliometrics and scientific knowledge mappings, and from both domestic and foreign dimensions systematically answers the three questions of "what kinds of academic groups in China and abroad have been formed", "what influential research results have been produced" and "what kind of thematic change rules have been shown". Besides, the similarities and differences between Chinese and abroad studies are also analyzed, which would be helpful for promoting China′s organizational ambidextrous research to the international forefront. The research results are as follows：First, Chinese researchers can be classified into ambidextrous innovation, cooperation network, and ambidextrous leadership, etc., while foreign researchers can be classified into hybrid strategies, human resource management, and social capital, etc., and the domestic research mainly focuses on technology innovation, knowledge management，internationalization, informatization and leadership behavior, etc., while the foreign studies mainly focus on the economic transition, emerging economies and the application of traditional Chinese management culture; Second, the articles of Jiao Hao, Wang Fengbin, Wei Jiang, Cao Q, Wang CL, Lin HE, Atuahene-Gimak and other authors are the landmark literatures in the field, and the distribution of achievements is consistent with the characteristics of the academic communities；Third，the research hotspots and knowledge evolution trends are different between China and abroad, with the international communities pay close attention to human resource practice, social capital, consolidation and merger, etc., while the domestic scholars pay close attention to top management team behavior integration, network relation, and open innovation，etc., in addition, some of the Chinese and foreign research topics are overlapped, some of them appear successively, and some of them grow separately, for example, foreign research on market orientation, dynamic capability, and transformational leadership is ahead of research in China, while research on absorptive capacity in China is ahead of the foreign research, and on the whole, there are more research topics in China than abroad, showing stronger ductility.This study for the first time connects the academic groups, representative literatures and research trends at home and abroad, which objectively reflects the global knowledge network of the organizational ambidextrous research in the Chinese context, responses to Luo Jinlian′s question about whether the domestic and foreign ambidextrous studies are consistent and the academic thinking on "how to promote the dialogue between Chinese studies and world studies", complements the shortcomings of previous studies in the Chinese context and dynamic evolution analysis, and puts forward the future research directions, which would help scholars think more deeply about the uniqueness of the duality problems in Chinese management from the perspective of global management innovation, and promote the Chinese studies to the world by integrating the East and the West.
Key words
Chinese context /
organizational ambidexterity /
knowledge mappings /
CSSCI /
Web of Science /
comparative study
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]魏江, 邬爱其, 彭雪蓉.中国战略管理研究:情境问题与理论前沿[J].管理世界, 2014, 30(12):167-171
[2]陆亚东.中国管理学理论研究的窘境与未来[J].外国经济与管理, 2015, 37(3):3-15
[3]莫申江.领导者如何创造商业与社会的双重价值[J].清华管理评论, 2016, 39(3):48-53
[4]王曰芬.文献计量法与内容分析法的综合研究[D].南京:南京理工大学, 2007：12.
[5]赵蓉英, 张扬.基于时空维度的国内外情感分析研究演化分析[J].情报科学, 2018, 36(10):173-179
[6].[7]刘则渊，陈悦，侯海科学知识图谱:方法与应用[M]．北京:人民出版社，2008:2, 37．
[7][9][10][12]陈悦, 陈超美, 胡志刚, 王贤文等.引文空间分析原理与应用:Citespace实用指南[M].北京:科学出版社, 2014：9，88, 136，43.
[8]焦豪.双元型组织竞争优势的构建路径:基于动态能力理论的实证研究[J].管理世界, 2011, 27(11):76-91
[9]王凤彬, 陈建勋, 杨阳.探索式与利用式技术创新及其平衡的效应分析[J].管理世界, 2012, 28(3):102-118
[10]魏江, 徐蕾.知识网络双重嵌入、知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J].管理科学学报, 2014, 23(2):34-47
[11]许晖, 李文.高科技企业组织学习与双元创新关系实证研究[J].管理科学, 2013, 26(4):35-45
[12]李桦, 彭思喜.战略柔性、双元性创新和企业绩效[J].管理学报, 2011, 8(11):1604-1609
[13]周俊, 薛求知.双元型组织构建研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理, 2009, 31(1):50-57
[14]韩杨, 罗瑾琏, 钟竞.双元领导对团队创新绩效影响研究—基于惯例视角[J].管理科学, 2016, 29(1):70-85
[15]付丙海, 谢富纪, 韩雨卿.创新链资源整合、双元性创新与创新绩效:基于长三角新创企业的实证研究[J].中国软科学, 2015, 30(12):181-191
[16]Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H.Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions,Contingencies,and Synergistic Effects[J].Organization Science, 2009, 20(4):781-796
[17]Kwaku, Atuahene-Gima, Janet, et al.Exploratory and Exploitative Learning in New Product Development: A Social Capital Perspective on New Technology Ventures in China[J].Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(2):1-29
[18]Zhou K Z, Wu F.Technology Capability,Strategic Flexibility,and Product Innovation[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 31(5):547-561
[19] Meyer, Klaus E; Peng, Mike W.Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2016, 47(1):3-22
[20]赵蓉英, 余波.国际数据挖掘研究热点与前沿可视化分析_赵蓉英[J].现代情报, 2018, 38(6):130-139
[21]Mac Callum R C, Widaman K F，Zhang S，Hong S.Sample Sizein Factor Analysis[J].Psycholical Methods, 1999, 4(1):84-99
[22]March J.G.Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action[ J][J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(2):278-287
[23]Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E.THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4):693-706
[24]Raisch S, Birkinshaw J.Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents,Outcomes,and Moderators[J].Journal of Management, 2008, 34(5):375-409
[25]彭新敏, 吴晓波, 吴东.基于二次创新动态过程的企业网络与组织学习平衡模式演化—海天1971～2010年纵向案例研究[J].管理世界, 2011, 27(4):138-149
[26]赵洁, 魏泽龙, 李垣.高管激励机制、组合能力对创新双元性的影响研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2012, 28(2):108-115
[27]武亚军.“战略框架式思考”、“悖论整合”与企业竞争优势—任正非的认知模式分析及管理启示[J].管理世界, 2013, 29(4):150-167
[28]陈建勋.组织学习的前因后果研究:基于二元视角[J].科研管理, 2011, 32(06):140-149
[29]罗瑾琏, 管建世, 钟竞, 等.基于团队双元行为中介作用的双元领导与团队创新绩效关系研究[J].管理学报, 2017, 14(6):814-822
[30]欧阳桃花, 崔争艳, 张迪等.多层级双元能力的组合促进高科技企业战略转型研究——以联想移动为案例[J].管理评论, 2016, 28(1):219-228
[31]岳鹄, 张宗益, 朱怀念.创新主体差异性、双元组织学习与开放式创新绩效[J].管理学报, 2018, 15(01):48-56
[32]彭新敏, 张帆.技术变革、次序双元与后发企业追赶[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(11):2016-2025
[33]张振刚, 沈鹤, 余传鹏.外部知识搜寻及其双元性对科技型中小企业管理创新的影响[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(20):99-106
[34]尤树洋, 蔡亚华, 贾良定.兼具自恋和谦卑特质与组织双元性的关系研究[J].经济管理, 2020, 42(05):73-89
[35]徐伟, 汤筱晓, 王新新.传承还是创新?老字号品牌双元性实现路径研究——一项模糊集的定性比较分析[J].经济管理, 2020, 42(8):85-104
[36]Yang, Tsau Tang，Li Ci-Rong.Competence exploration and exploitation in new product development[J].Management Decision, 2011, 49(9):1444-1470
[37]Eric Gedajlovic，Qing Cao，Hong ping Zhang.Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: Evidence from a transitional economy[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(6):652-665
[38]Catherine L.Wang，Mohammed RafiqAmbidextrous Organizational Culture,Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovation: A Comparative Study of UK and Chinese High-tech Firms[J].British Journal of Management, 2012, 25(1):58-76
[39]Wei, Zelong; Zhao, Jie; Zhang, Chenlu.Organizational ambidexterity, market orientation, and firm performance[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2014, 17(33):134-153
[40]Li, Ci‐Rong.How top management team diversity fosters organizational ambidexterity[J].Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2013, 26(5):874-896
[41]Stephanie Lu WANG, Yadong LUO, Vladislav MAKSIMOV, Jinyun SUN, Nikhil CELLY.Achieving Temporal Ambidexterity in New Ventures[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2019, 56(4):788-822
[42]Zheng D, Huang L, KJ Kim.How ambidextrous social networking service users balance different social capital benefits: An evidence from WeChat[J].Internet Research, 2020, 31(2):1066-2233
[43]熊立, 曹元坤, 朱建斌.国外个体二元性研究前沿及展望[J].管理评论, 2018, 30(4):142-156
Funding
Research on Quality Evaluation Criteria of Entrepreneurial Talent Training in Common Undergraduate Colleges Based on PDCA Management Cycle: Zhejiang Empirical Study;Research on Zhejiang Model of Multi-subject Cooperative Promotion of Industry and Education Integration: From the Perspective of Stakeholders
PDF(1534 KB)
