Since 2006, the system of China′s science and technology Innovation Policy has been changed profoundly with the intense promulgation of the policies to spur science and technology innovation,among which,the national-level plans, strategies,programs and measures, such as the National Medium and Long-Term Science and Technology Development Plan (2006-2020), the Outline of the National Strategy of Innovation-driven Development,the measures to vigorously promote mass entrepreneurship and innovation, are of great importance. However so far there have been few very recent attempts at comprehensive research in understanding China′s science and technology innovation policies (2006~2018). This study will fill the gap by quantitatively analyzing the evolution of China′s science and technology innovation policies issued from 2006 to 2018 and examining the nexus between the aforementioned policies and China′s innovation performance.In this study, the main valid science and technology innovation policies issued by the central state ministries and commissions are collected and then analyzed on the basis of previous research to evaluate the strength, enforcement and synergy of these policies quantitatively. The evolvements of the synergy and the total efficacy of these policies are dissected and depicted since 2006. The production function model is established and then the ridge regression is applied to examine the relationship between the traits of science and technology innovation policies, from which the following conclusions can be inferred. As a first consequence, the synergy of China′s science and technology innovation policies from 2006 to 2018 is rising significantly with the improvement of the policy-making cooperation among the ministries and commissions under the State Council and the growth of the policies issued by two or more departments. Currently the cooperation of the policymakers regarding the science and technology innovation policies is associated closely with the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Ministry of Finance, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. It is a common consensus in China that the national ministries and commissions should take coordinated policy action to promote the science and technology innovation.The second conclusion is that the efficacy of China′s science and technology innovation policies is growing markedly since 2006 along with the increase of the strength of the innovation policies, the comprehensive application of various policy instruments, the policy making cooperation among national departments and the improvement of the policies′ implementation efforts. The efficacy of these policies is underlined by the recent performance of the science and technology innovation in China. Finally, it is confirmed empirically by ridge regression that the science and technology innovation policies have significantly positive effects on the science and technology innovation performance. Meanwhile, differences are observed among various traits of the science and technology innovation policies in their influences on the outcome of innovation. Due to a very great portion of applied research, the major science and technology achievements are most closely affected by the enforceability of the science and technology innovation policy. More major achievements can be produced with a clear and specific orientation stated in the science and technology innovation policies. The enhancement of the synergy of science and technology innovation policy can be conductive to the growth of the invention patent grants, therefore to obtain more independent intellectual property, the policymakers should cooperate more to improve the synergy of the science and technology innovation policy. The sales revenues of new products are mainly influenced by the strength,enforcement and synergy of the science and technology innovation policy so that it is necessary to integrate the three aspects, that is, efficacy, synergy and clarity of the policy, to promote the sales growth of new products.
Key words
science and technology innovation policy /
policy evolution /
policy synergy /
policy effect
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]陈向东, 胡萍.我国技术创新政策效用实证分析[J].科学学研究, 2004, 22(1):108-112
[2]杜根旺,汪涛.创新政策协调研究综述及展望[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(7):1-11
[3]郭本海,李军强,张笑腾.政策协同对政策效力的影响——基于项中国光伏产业政策的实证研究[J].科学学研究, 2018, 36(5):790-799
[4]黄萃, 任弢, 李江, 赵培强, 苏竣.责任与利益:基于政策文献量化分析的中国科技创新政策府际合作关系演进研究[J].管理世界, 2015, (12):68-81
[5]李凡、林汉川、刘沛罡、李娜.中俄技术创新政策演进比较研究[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(9):1348-1356
[6]李伟铭,崔毅,陈泽鹏,王明伟.技术创新政策对中小企业创新绩效影响的实证研究:以企业资源投入和组织激励为中介变量[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, (9):61-65
[7]梁正.从科技政策到科技与创新政策———创新驱动发展战略下的政策范式转型与思考[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(2):170-176
[8]刘凤朝, 徐茜.中国科技政策主体合作网络演化研究[J].科学学研究, 2012, 30(2):241-248
[9]吕燕.我国促进企业技术创新政策失灵问题研究[J].中国行政管理, 2014, (12):104-109
[10]汪涛,李祎,汪樟发.国家高新区政策的历史演进及协调状况研究[J].科研管理, 2011, 32(6):108-115
[11]彭国富.中国地方技术创新政策效果分析[J].研究与发展管理, 2003, 15(3):17-21
[12]彭纪生,孙文祥,仲为国.中国技术创新政策演变与绩效实证研究(1978-2006)[J].科研管理, 2008a, 29(4):134-150
[13]彭纪生,仲为国,孙文祥.政策测量、政策协同演变与经济绩效:基于创新政策的实证研究[J].管理世界, 2008b, (9):25-36
[14]肖士恩,雷家啸,刘文艳.北京市科技创新政策评价及改进建议[J].中国科技论坛, 2004, (9):53-55
[15]王洛忠,张艺君.我国新能源汽车产业政策协同问题研究——基于结构、过程与内容的三维框架[J].中国行政管理, 2017, (3):101-107
[16]詹爱岚,翟青.中国专利激增动因及创新力研究[J].科学学研究, 2013, 31(10):1504-1511
[17]张国兴, 高秀林, 汪应洛.中国节能减排政策的测量、协同与演变---基于-年政策数据的研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(12):62-73
[18]张玉臣,吕宪鹏.高新技术企业创新绩效影响因素研究[J].科研管理, 2013, 34(12):58-65
[19]薛澜.中国科技创新政策年的回顾与反思[J].科学学研究, 2018, 36(12):2113-2115
[20]Edler, J., Shapira, P., Cunningham, P., Gok, A..Conclusions: Evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention[C].in Edler, J. Cunningham, P., Gok, A. and Shapira, P.(eds.) Handbook of Innovation policy impact. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, 2016, :543-564
[21]Flanagan,K,Uyarra E, Laranja, M.Reconceputalising the policy mix for innovation[J].Research Policy, 2011, 40(5):702-713
[22]Hu A G, Jefferson G H.A great wall of patents: what is behind China’s recent patent explosion?[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2009, (9):57-68
[23]Lemola T..Convergence of national science and technology policies:The case of Finland[J].Research Policy, 2002, (31):1481-1490
[24]Li X.Behind the recent surge of Chinese patenting: an institutional view[J].Research policy, 2012, (41):236-249
[25]Schot, Johan, Steinmueller, W Edward.Three frames for innovation policy: R&D systems of innovation and transformative change[J].Research Policy, 2018, 47(9):1554-1567