The technical development path analysis, to a certain extent, can trace, discover, identify the development direction of technology and support the technology forecasting. Currently, disruptive technology is the focus attention of national strategy, analyzing characteristics and exploring regularities from the perspective of development path can serve the development of disruptive technology. This paper uses the citation network analysis method that related with the tripartite structure model, combine the relationship between the tripartite group and the network traversal weights, constructed a model for measuring the degree of technological disruption of 3D printing based on the importance of network papers, the network characteristics and path characteristics. Studies have shown that the established measurement method for disruptive technology development can dynamically measure the importance of a stable 3D printing technology. Through tripartite analysis, network analysis, and path analysis, it is shown that in a disruptive process of 3D printing, it has repeatedly disrupted its internal sub-technology; the statistical peak of the importance degree of 3D printing technology appeared in 2003, steadily increased before 2003, and remained stable after 2003; in terms of internal sub-technology, through main path analysis, the "selective laser sintering" sub-technology of the 3D printing technology has experienced many disruptions at the level of material application.
In this study, the measurement analysis of the path of disruptive technology development is based on citation network analysis, which is carried out from four aspects: degree of disruption, tripartite group analysis, network feature analysis, and path feature analysis. The main research steps are as follows:
(1) Combining previous research results, from the perspective of technology development path, introduce the concept of disruptive degree, measure the disruptive degree of disruptive technology in the network, to judge the technology under relative and historical conditions development characteristics.
(2) Build an overall paper citation network containing time partitioned files and technical topics, using the node traversal weight algorithm and main path analysis to establish the relationship between the tripartite network and the node traversal weight algorithm, and analyze the characteristics of the technical tripartite group under dynamic conditions and network characteristics.
(3) According to the main path analysis method, extract the main path of sub-technology development from the citation network, and analyze the typical path characteristics of the technology.
In terms of research conclusions, from the analysis of the degree of disruptiveness, the shape of the disruptiveness curve of 3D printing is similar to that of Gartner′s technology maturity curve, both of which are characterized by the presence of a rising peak, and then slowly rebound after a decline. From the analysis of the tripartite group, the type of tripartite group with a large positive deviation from the expected value determines the core structure of the tripartite group in the network; both the overall and detailed networks show that the 9-030T tripartite group is the main structure of the network. Then when calculating the node traversal weights, its influence degree is also the largest. This is also the bridge and foundation for this study to connect the degree of disruption with the analysis of network characteristics.
In terms of research enlightenment, focus on analyzing the development of disruptive technologies from a dynamic process and a relative perspective. Disruptive technology is a dynamic and relative concept. A technology is called disruptive technology. Firstly, there must be a comparison object. Because to talk about disruptive technology, it is often easy to fall into the dilemma of defining the concept of disruptive technology. Secondly, to analyze the dynamic characteristics, combine the dynamics of disruptive technology, and study disruptive technology, it is necessary to take disruptive objects and peripheral environment into consideration at the same time, and develop corresponding research methods and means. In terms of researching the applicability of data, this method selects the paper data as the source, constructs the 9-030T tripartite citation network and calculates the degree of disruption, analyzes the network traversal weights, and analyzes the data source of the main path. Correspondingly, if you can handle some of the constraints, you can also use the citation relationship of patents and open-source software to conduct similar research.
Key words
disruptive technology /
3D printing /
tripartite structure model /
network traversal weight /
main path analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Christensen C M.The Innovator' s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail[M]. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
[2] Christensen C M, Raynor M.The Innovator' s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth[M]. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
[3]Danneels E.Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 21(4):246-258
[4]Tellis G J.Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership?[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 23(1):34-38
[5]Huang X.Analysis of Industry Equilibria in Models with Sustaining and Disruptive Technology[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1):238-248
[6]Anderson P, Tushman M L.Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change[J].Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 35(4):604-633
[7] 贾珍珍, 曾华锋, 刘戟锋.美国颠覆性军事技术的预研模式、管理与文化——以美国国防高级研究计划局(Darpa)为例. [J].自然辩证法研究, 2016, 1(1):41-45
[8]Walsh S T, Kirchhoff B A, Newbert S.Differentiating Market Strategies for Disruptive Technologies[J].Engineering Management IEEE Transactions on, 2002, 49(4):341-351
[9]Kassicieh S K, Kirchhoff B A, Walsh S T, et al.The Role of Small Firms in the Transfer of Disruptive Technologies[J].Technovation, 2002, 22(11):667-674
[10]王安, 孙棕檀, 沈艳波.国外颠覆性技术识别方法浅析[J].中国工程科学, 2017, 19(5):79-84
[11]Slavin K V.Disruptive Innovation Concept[J].Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery, 2012, 90(1):8-8
[12]Ganguly A, Nilchiani R, Farr J V.Defining a Set of Metrics to Evaluate the Potential Disruptiveness of a Technology[J].Engineering Management Journal, 2010, 22(1):34-44
[13]Cagnin C, Havas A, Saritas O.Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Its Potential to Address Disruptive Transformations[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2013, 80(3):379-385
[14]Dereli T, Altun K.A Novel Approach for Assessment of Candidate Technologies with Respect to Their Innovation Potentials: Quick Innovation Intelligence Process[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(3):881-891
[15]Christensen C M, Overdorf M.Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change[J].Harvard Business Review, 2000, 78(2):66-77
[16]Christensen C M, Raynor M E, Mcdonald R.What Is Disruptive Innovation[J].Harvard Business Review, 2015, 93(12):44-53
[17]栾春娟, 程昉.技术的市场潜力测度与预测——基于技术颠覆潜力与技术成熟度综合指标[J].科学学研究, 2016, 34(12):1761-1768
[18]Wu L, Wang D, Evans J A.Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology[J].Nature, 2019, 566(7744):378-399
[19]De Souza S, Davis J.Spinal Cord Damage in a Newborn Infant[J].Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1974, 49(1):70-71
[20]Percy W.Toward a Triadic Theory of Meaning[J].Psychiatry-interpersonal & Biological Processes, 1972, 35(1):1-19
[21]Holland P, Samuelleinhardt.An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs[J].Publications of the American Statistical Association, 1981, 76(373):33-50
[22]Hummon N P, Dereian P.Connectivity in a Citation Network: The Development of DNA Theory[J].Social Networks, 1989, 11(1):39-63
[23] Batagelj V.Efficient Algorithms for Citation Network Analysis. [J].Computer Science, 2003, 9(9):12-15