Management incentives, institutional investor shareholding, and corporate heterogeneous R&amp;D investment

MA Qing-Kui; FAN Meng-Chen

PDF(389 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 140-149.

Management incentives, institutional investor shareholding, and corporate heterogeneous R&D investment

Ma Qingkui, Fan Mengchen

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the impacts of management incentives on corporate R&D investment from the perspective of heterogeneity. Based on the review of relevant theories, this paper puts forward hypotheses about the impacts of equity incentive and compensation incentive on heterogeneous R&D investment and the moderating effect of institutional investor shareholding on the above relationships. Then, using the panel data of Chinese listed companies from 2007 to 2016, the two-stage least square method (2SLS) is adopted to conduct an empirical test. The results show that equity incentive has a significant promoting effect on both research investment and development investment. Compensation incentive has a positive effect on development investment, while the relationship between compensation incentive and research investment shows an inverted "U" shape. With the increase of the shareholding ratio, the supervisory role of institutional investors on corporate investment decision becomes stronger, which strengthens the impacts of equity incentive on research investment and development investment, and crowds out the impacts of compensation incentive. R&D investment can not only improve the current corporate performance, but also have positive effects on future corporate performances, and there is an obvious period difference between the impacts of research investment and development investment on future corporate performances.
The possible theoretical contributions of this paper are as follows. First, based on the perspective of heterogeneity, the impact mechanisms of equity incentive and compensation incentive on research investment and development investment are explored, and conclusions such as the threshold effect of the impact of compensation incentive on research investment are obtained. This makes up for the lack of structural attention to R&D investment and expands the research on management incentives and corporate R&D investment. Second, the promoting or crowding-out effect of institutional investor shareholding (external governance mechanism) on management incentives (internal governance mechanism) is also considered, which makes up for the lack of previous studies that focused on the impact of a single governance mechanism on corporate R&D investment, brings the internal and external governance mechanisms into a unified analysis framework, and expands the research on corporate governance and corporate R&D investment.
According to the above conclusions, the policy implications of this paper are as follows. First, companies should establish an equity incentive mechanism that adapts to innovation-driven development, appropriately improve the level of equity incentive, and expand the coverage of equity incentive. It is necessary to improve the level of equity incentive of top management through various methods such as equity awards and stock options, and include core R&D personnel and management personnel into the scope of equity incentive through employee shareholding plans. Thus, the level of R&D investment that can increase the long-term corporate value can be increased, and the problem of weak long-term performance growth caused by insufficient R&D investment can be solved. Second, companies should appropriately control the level of top management compensation, link compensation to reasonable consumption, design a top management incentive system that adapts to the long-term corporate development in combination with equity incentive, and avoid insufficient or excessive R&D investment caused by the risk attitude of top management. Third, in order to improve the performance of top management and enhance the long-term corporate value, the institutional investor shareholding ratio should be increased, and the external supervision mechanism of top management should be improved with the help of professional institutional investors. Fourth, corporate R&D investment not only positively affects current performance, but also has significant promoting effects on future performances. Companies should pay sufficient attention to the transition of R&D investment from the research stage to the development stage, so as to ensure the continuity of benefits.

Key words

heterogeneous R&D investment / equity incentive / compensation incentive / institutional investor shareholding

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Ma Qingkui, Fan Mengchen. Management incentives, institutional investor shareholding, and corporate heterogeneous R&D investment[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(9): 140-149

References

[1] JENSEN M C，MECKLING W H. Theory of the firm：Managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3（4）:305-360.

[2] SHUE K，TOWNSEND R R. How do quasi-random option grants affect CEO risk-taking？[J]. The Journal of Finance,2017,72（6）:2551-2588.

[3] 欧丽慧，陈天明，李真.高管股权激励模式对激励效果的影响研究——基于中国上市公司的比较分析[J].管理案例研究与评论,2018,11（3）:303-318.

OU Lihui,CHEN Tianming,LI Zhen. Study on the impacts of executive equity incentive mode on the incentive effects：Comparative analysis based on Chinese listed companies[J]. Journal of Management Case Studies,2018,11（3）：303-318.

[4] 王燕妮.高管激励对研发投入的影响研究——基于我国制造业上市公司的实证检验[J].科学学研究，2011,29（7）:1071-1078.

WANG Yanni. The influence of top management incentives on R&D investment：Evidence from listed manufacturing companies in China[J]. Studies in Science of Science,2011,29（7）:1071-1078.

[5] 姜涛，王怀明.高管激励对高新技术企业R&D投入的影响——基于实际控制人类型视角[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24（4）:53-60.

JIANG Tao,WANG Huaiming. The influence of executive incentive on R&D expenditure of high-tech enterprises：Based on the perspective of ultimate controller[J]. R&D Management，2012，24（4）：53-60.

[6] BAIXAULI-SOLER J S，BELDA-RUIZ M，SANCHEZ-MARIN G. Executive stock options，gender diversity in the top management team，and firm risk taking[J]. Journal of Business Research，2015，68（2）：451-463.

[7] 陈金勇,汤湘希，孙建波.管理层持股激励与企业技术创新[J].软科学，2015，29（9）：29-33.

CHEN Jinyong，TANG Xiangxi，SUN Jianbo. Managerial ownership incentive and corporate innovation[J]. Soft Science,2015,29（9）:29-33.

[8] SHLEIFER A，VISHNY R W. Large shareholders and corporate control[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94（3）:461-488.

[9] TRICKER B. The role of the institutional investor in corporate governance[J]. Corporate Governance:An International Review,1998,6（4）:213-216.

[10] GILLAN S L,STARKS L T. Corporate governance,corporate ownership,and the role of institutional investors：A global perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Finance,2003,13（2）:04-22.

[11] 郭园园，成力为.外部融资渠道与企业异质性R&D投资[J].科学学研究,2016,34（6）:887-895.

GUO Yuanyuan,CHENG Liwei. The external financing channels and the heterogeneity of enterprises’ R&D investment[J]. Studies in Science of Science,2016,34（6）:887-895.

[12] 顾群，翟淑萍.融资约束、研发投资与资金来源——基于研发投资异质性的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35（3）:15-22.

GU Qun，ZHAI Shuping. Financial constraints，R&D investment and funding sources：The perspective of R&D heterogeneity[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T.,2014,35（3）:15-22.

[13] GIBBONS R，MURPHY K J. Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns：Theory and evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1992,100（3）:468-505.

[14] CHENG S. R&D expenditures and CEO compensation[J]. The Accounting Review，2004，79（2）：305-328.

[15] FAMA E F,JENSEN M C. Separation of ownership and control[J]. The Journal of Law and Economics，1983,26（2）:301-325.

[16] BULAN L，SANYAL P. Incentivizing managers to build innovative firms[J]. Annals of Finance，2011，7（2）：267-283.

[17] 唐清泉，甄丽明.管理层风险偏爱、薪酬激励与企业R&D投入——基于我国上市公司的经验研究[J].经济管理，2009，31（5）：56-64.

TANG Qingquan,ZHEN Liming. Management risk preference，compensate incentive and R&D investment：Based on Chinese listed company[J]. Economic Management Journal,2009,31（5）：56-64.

[18] 刘运国，刘雯.我国上市公司的高管任期与R&D支出[J].管理世界,2007,23（1）:128-136.

LIU Yunguo，LIU Wen. Top management tenure and R&D expenditure of listed companies in China[J]. Management World，2007，23（1）：128-136.

[19] KAHNEMAN D,TVERSKY A. Prospect theory：An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica，1979，47（2）：263-291.

[20] 卢锐，魏明海，黎文靖.管理层权力、在职消费与产权效率——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].南开管理评论，2008，11（5）：85-92.

LU Rui,WEI Minghai，LI Wenjing. Managerial power，perquisite consumption and performance of property right：Evidence from Chinese listed companies[J]. Nankai Business Review,2008,11（5）:85-92.

[21] HE W，SHEN J. Do foreign investors improve informational efficiency of stock prices？Evidence from Japan[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal，2014，27（1）：32-48.

[22] 鞠晓生，卢荻，虞义华.融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J].经济研究，2013，48（1）：4-16.

JU Xiaosheng,LU Di,YU Yihua. Financing constraints,working capital management and the persistence of firm innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal,2013，48（1）：4-16.

[23] 毕晓方，翟淑萍，姜宝强.政府补贴、财务冗余对高新技术企业双元创新的影响[J].会计研究，2017，38（1）：46-52.

BI Xiaofang,ZHAI Shuping,JIANG Baoqiang. Government subsidies,financial slack and ambidextrous innovation[J]. Accounting Research,2017,38（1）：46-52.

[24] 肖海莲，唐清泉，周美华.负债对企业创Research新投资模式的影响——基于R&D异质性的实证研究[J].科研管理,2014,35（10）：77-85.

XIAO Hailian,TANG Qingquan,ZHOU Meihua. The impact of debt on firms’ innovation investment mode：An empirical research on R&D heterogeneity[J]. Science Research Management,2014,35（10）:77-85.

[25] 谭劲松，林雨晨.机构投资者对信息披露的治理效应——基于机构调研行为的证据[J].南开管理评论，2016,19（5）:115-126.

TAN Jinsong,LIN Yuchen. The governance role of institutional investors in information disclosure：Evidence from institutional investors’ corporate visits[J]. Nankai Business Review,2016,19（5）:115-126.