The impact of openness heterogeneity of industry-university-research cooperation on the innovation performance of firms

Gao Xia, Cao Jieqiong, Bao Lingling

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 112-119.

PDF(321 KB)
PDF(321 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 112-119.

The impact of openness heterogeneity of industry-university-research cooperation on the innovation performance of firms

  • Gao Xia, Cao Jieqiong, Bao Lingling
Author information +
History +

Abstract

    In the era of knowledge economy, open innovation has gradually become an important way for enterprises to obtain the key resources needed by technology innovation. Industry-university-research cooperation is one of the important forms of open innovation. It is also important for enterprises to seek external technical resources to break through their own resources and capacity constrains so as to achieve innovation performance. The heterogeneity of organization and the complementarity of knowledge are the motivation and foundation for enterprises to cooperate with universities and research institutions. Exploring the relationship between openness heterogeneity and innovation performance for industry-university-research cooperation can not only enrich the open innovative theory, but also play an important role in the selection of enterprise partners and the establishment of rational enterprise R&D cooperation strategy. 
   Cooperation openness is an indictor to describe the degree of cooperation between enterprises and external organizations, including the breadth and depth of cooperation. The breadth of cooperation refers to the extent to which an enterprise establishes cooperative relations with other organizations. The more extensive the enterprise cooperation is, the more beneficial it is to widen the breadth of the knowledge base, to increase the type of knowledge source, and to promote the innovation performance. The depth of cooperation refers to the average number of cooperation between enterprises and partners. It means that enterprises absorb the depth of external information and knowledge from external sources of knowledge. Industry-University-Research institution through deep-level cooperation can strengthen the degree of trust, establish lasting trust relationship, weaken knowledge transfer risk and cost, reduce information asymmetry and improve innovation ability. 
    Scholars pay less attention to the research on the effect of openness heterogeneity for inter-organizational cooperation on innovation performance. To make up for the lack of existing research, the Industry-University-Research institution (I-U-R) cooperation networks have been created with three-year windows, based on co-applied patents data from the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) in the Chinese Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry during 1999-2015. With a longitudinal sample of 14, 596 Chinese firms we analyze the impact of heterogeneous openness of universities and research institutions on firm innovation performance using the negative binomial regression method. 
    The results show that the regression coefficients of enterprise-enterprise and enterprise-university cooperation breadth were significantly positive at the significant level of 5%. It means that the cooperation breadth of enterprise-enterprise and enterprise-university has a positive impact on innovation performance of the enterprise. The regression coefficients of cooperation breadth for enterprises-research institutions were significantly negative at the significant level of 1%. It means that the cooperation breadth of enterprises-research institutions has a negative impact on innovation performance of the enterprise. In terms of cooperation depth, the regression coefficients of for enterprise-enterprise cooperation has not passed the significant test. This show that the cooperation depth of enterprises enterprise has no significant impact on innovation performance of the enterprises. The regression coefficients of enterprise-university cooperation depth were significantly positive at the significant level of 1%.  It means that the cooperation depth of enterprise-university has a positive impact on innovation performance of the enterprise. The regression coefficients of for enterprise-research institutions cooperation has not passed the significant test. This shows that the cooperation depth of enterprises-research institutions has no significant impact on innovation performance of the enterprises. In general, whether the cooperation between enterprises and universities is extensive or deep level, all has significant impact on innovation performance of the enterprises. So, the universities play an important role in improving the innovative performance of ICT enterprises in China. But the research institutions promoting effect on innovation performance of ICT enterprises need to be further improved. 
    Industry-university-research cooperation has always been the core problem of the phenomenon of "two skins" between science and technology and economy in China. The key to industry-university-research cooperation is to strengthen and highlight the enterprise main position in technology innovation, to speed up the establishment of enterprises as the main market-oriented, in-depth integration of innovative-technology system. Therefore, the industry-university-research cooperation should pay attention to the depth of integration. The conclusions of the study provide a theoretical basis for the design of the mode of in-depth integration of industry-university-research in China. At the same time, it will also help to further improve the theory of open innovation. Policy suggestions are as follows.
    First, strength the depth of integration between enterprises and research institutions to build research and development platform. Generally speaking, the R&D personnel in the enterprises and the experts in research organization have different goals. The former emphasizes the applicability of technology, while the latter emphasizes the advancement of technology. By enterprises and research institutions to build laboratories, engineering research centers or other R&D platforms is to promote the in-depth exchange and integration of talent, technology and information. The two sides jointly carry out scientific and technological transformation of enterprises, production development and tackling key scientific and technological problems, so as to directly promote the transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements.
    Second, it should carry out the major project of combining industry-university-research in science and technology, build a public service platform for the transformation and incubation of S&T achievements and the innovative alliance, improve the system and mechanism of innovation, vigorously promote the synergy innovation between industry-university-research, and continue to expand the depth and breadth of cooperation between the main innovation bodies. Encourage more and more university and research institutions to break the traditional focus on academic research or closed R&D ideas, based on the needs of enterprises to carry out targeted innovation and services. Encourage more and more university and research institutions to play an important role in some core technologies and modules of the R&D process.
   Due to the availability of data, the paper uses joint patent application as a measure of industry-university-research cooperation has some limitations. In the future research other indicators of industry-university-research cooperation should be expanded. 

Key words

 industry-university-research cooperation / openness / cooperation breadth / cooperation depth / innovation performance

Cite this article

Download Citations
Gao Xia, Cao Jieqiong, Bao Lingling. The impact of openness heterogeneity of industry-university-research cooperation on the innovation performance of firms[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(9): 112-119

References

[1] CHESBROUGH H.Open innovation the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology [M].Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press,2003.

[2] CHEN J,CHEN Y,VANHAVERBEKE W. The influence of scope,depth,and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms[J].Technovation,2011,31 (8): 362-373.

[3] LAURSEN K,SALTER A.Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27 (2):131150.

[4] 陈钰芬,陈劲.开放度对企业技术创新绩效的影响 [J].科学学研究,2008,26( 2) : 419426.

CHEN Yufen,CHEN Jin. The influence of openness to innovation performance[J].Studies in Science of Science,2008,26( 2) : 419 426.

[5] 马艳艳, 刘凤朝,姜滨滨,王元地. 企业跨组织研发合作广度和深度对创新绩效的影响p——基于中国工业企业数据的实证 [J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(6):33-40.

MA Yanyan,LIU Fengchao,JIANG Binbin,WANG Yuandi.The influence of scope and depth of firmsinter organizational R&D collaboration on enterprise innovation performance: An empirical analysis based on Chinese industrial enterprises database [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(6):33-40.

[6] 吴友群, 赵京波, 王立勇. 产学研合作的经济绩效研究及其解释[J].科研管理, 2014, 35(7):         147-153

WU Youqun,ZHAO Junbo,WANG Liyong. Research on economic growth performance of industry - university - research institution collaboration and its interpretation[J].Science Research Management,2014, 35(7): 147-153 

[7] 蒋伏心,季柳. 产学研合作对企业技术创新的影响——基于门槛回归的实证研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2017, 31(7):132-138

JIANG Fuxin,JI Liu. The effect of industry-university-research cooperation on corporate  technology innovation——An empirical study based on the threshold regression [J]. East China Economic,2017, 31(7):132-138

[8] 魏守华, 王英茹, 汤丹宁. 产学研合作对中国高技术产业创新绩效的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2013(5):19-30.

WEI Shouhua,WANG Yingru,TANG Danning. The impacts of university-industry-research institute's collaboration on the innovative Performance of the Chinese high-tech industries [J]. Business Managment Journal,2013(5):19-30.

[9] 孙笑明, 崔文田, 董劲威. 创新合作伙伴选择与创新绩效之间的关系[J]. 科学学与科技管理研究, 2011, 32(11): 173-178.

SUN Xiaoming, CUI Wentian, DONG Jinwei. Relationship between the selection of collaborative innovation partners and innovation performance[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2011, 32(11): 173-178.

[10] 李梅芳, 刘国新, 刘璐. 企业与高校对产学研合作模式选择的比较研究[J]. 科研管,2012, 33(9): 154-160.

LI Meifang,LIU Guoxin,LIU Lu. The comparison between companies and universities for choosing the collaborative model of industry -university -research institute collaboration[J]. Science Research Management,2012, 33(9): 154-160.

[11]POWELL W W, KOPUT K W, SMITH-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the                                                     locus of innovation: Networks of laming in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996,116-145.

[12]HANEL P,ST-Pierre M. Industry-university collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2006,31(4:485-499.

[13]RITALA P,HURMELINNA-Laukkanen P.What’s in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition [J]. Technovation,2009,29(12),819-828.

[14]ARRANZ N,FDEZ de Arroyabe J C.The choice of partners in R&D cooperation:An empirical analysis of Spanish firms [J]. Technovation,2008,28(1),88-100.

[15]周城雄. 隐性知识与显性知识的概念辨析[J]. 情报理论与实践,2004,(2):127-129.

ZHOU Chengxiong.The concept differentiation of tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application,2004,(2):127-129.

[16] 曹达华,朱桂龙,邓颖翔. 吸收能力对校企合作绩效的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策,2013(3):05-09.

CAO Dahua,ZHU Guilong,DENG Yingxiang.The impact of absorptive capacity on university and industry collaboration performance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2013(3):05-09.

[17] SCHILLING M A, PHELPS C C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation [J]. Management Science, 2007, 6: 1113-1126.

[18] OECD.Compendium of patent statistics [R]. Paris: OECD,2008.

[19] 张朝宾,吴洁,黄伟,.网络结构与组织间知识转移绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2011,28(19):112-116.

ZHANG Zhaobin, WU Jie, HUANG Wei,et al. An empirical research on the relationship between network structure and performance of the inter organizational knowledge transfer [J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2011,28(19):112-116.

[20] 梁靓. 开放式创新中合作伙伴组织异质性对创新绩效的影响机制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大,2015.

 LIANG Liang. The mechanism of partner heterogenity affecting innovative performance on open innovation[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2015.

[21] 唐方成,仝允桓.经济全球化背景下的开放式创新与企业的知识产权保护[J].中国软科学,2007 (6): 58-62.

TANG Fangcheng,TONG Yunhuan. Open innovation and intellectual property protection of firms under the globalization of economy [J].China Soft Science,2007 (6): 58-62.

[22] 喻科.产学研合作创新网络演进过程及其主体知识传递模式探究[J]. 科技进步与对  策,2010(14):141-144.

YU Ke. Evolution of industry-university-institute cooperative innovation network and its            agents knowledge transitive mode[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2010(14):141-144.

[23] GUAN J C, KAM Mok C. Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2006, 73: 666-678.

[24] 袁志彬. 以企业为核心的产学研合作模式[J]. 高科技与产业化, 2017, 6: 25-29.

YUAN Zhibin. Industry-university-research cooperation model with enterprises as the core [J]. High-Technology & Industrialization, 2017, 6: 25-29.

PDF(321 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/