A research on the influence mechanism of policy guidance&nbsp;on innovation performance of SMEs

ZHENG Ye

PDF(460 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 73-81.

A research on the influence mechanism of policy guidance on innovation performance of SMEs

Zheng Ye^1,2, Liu Yao³

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Government policies to guide the innovation and development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can usually be divided into direct policy guidance and indirect policy guidance. In practice, government departments at all levels vigorously promote the innovation and development of SMEs by playing a good combination of policies. However, does policy guidance affect the innovation performance of SMEs? Further, what policy guidance can promote the innovation and development of SMEs? The research on these problems can provide effective ideas for the implementation of national innovation-driven development strategy and the reform of government science and technology system. Up to now, although scholars have made fruitful achievements in the relationship between policy guidance and enterprise innovation, there is still a lack of relevant research to reveal the process of influence between the two. And few studies compare the impact of different types of policy guidance on enterprise innovation performance.Based on the theoretical research literature and practical interview, this study constructs a theoretical model of policy guidance affecting the innovation performance of SMEs. On this basis, the study takes 457 technology-based small and medium-sized enterprises in the mainland of China as the research object, and then empirically test the relationship among the variables such as policy guidance, enterprise innovation ability, enterprise scale, enterprise innovation performance, and identify the differences in the effect of different types of policy guidance on enterprise innovation performance. The results of multiple regression analysis show, Firstly, both direct and indirect policy guidance can significantly promote SMEs innovation performance, and the effect of direct policy guidance is stronger; Secondly, there is a significantly inverted U-shaped relationship between direct policy guidance and SMEs innovation capability. The innovation capability also plays a partial intermediary role in the relationship between policy guidance and SMEs innovation performance, and its intermediary role is stronger in the relationship between indirect policy guidance and SMEs innovation performance; Thirdly, enterprise size positively moderates the relationship between indirect policy guidance and SMEs innovation performance; Lastly, R&D subsidies, enterprise income tax deduction and weighted deduction for R&D expenses are the three policy guidance ways that can best improve the innovation performance of SMEs.Based on the above research, this study draws the following policy implications: (1) improving the innovation performance of SMEs is the ultimate goal of government policy guidance. At the same time, it is necessary to improve the innovation ability and performance of SMEs. (2) Direct policy guidance has an inverted U relationship with the innovation capacity of SMEs, which suggests that the government should set a certain standard for enterprise support, and when some enterprises meet this standard, it should consider other ways to promote the innovation ability of SMEs, rather than continue to blindly carry out direct support in order to avoid waste and inefficiency of resources. (3) There are obvious differences in the role of different types of policy guidance in promoting enterprise innovation performance, which requires government departments to conduct in-depth research on SMEs, and then adopt targeted guidance measures according to the characteristics of different enterprises, different stages of development and different needs, so as to avoid the "one-size-fits-all ". In addition, according to the research findings in this study, it is suggested that for the newly established and lack of resources, the direct policy guidance should be the main, but for the SMEs that have developed to a certain scale and have strong strength, we should consider indirect policy guidance to stimulate the due effect of different policies.

Key words

policy guidance / innovation performance / innovation capability / enterprise size / SMEs

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Zheng Ye, Liu Yao. A research on the influence mechanism of policy guidance on innovation performance of SMEs[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(4): 73-81

References

[1] Grandori A. Neither hierarchy nor identity: knowledge-governance mechanisms and the theory of the firm[J]. Journal of Management & Governance, 2001, 5(3-4): 381-399.

[2] Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(S2): 109-122.

[3] Liu Y., Li Y., Shi L. H., et al. Knowledge transfer in buyer-supplier relationships: the role of transactional and relational governance mechanisms[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 78: 285-293.

[4] Borzillo S. Balancing control and autonomy in communities of practice: governance patterns and knowledge in nine multinationals[J]. Journal of Business Strategy, 2017, 38(3): 10-20.

[5] Pemsel S., Wiewiora A., Muller R., et al. A conceptualization of knowledge governance in project-based organizations[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(8): 1411-1422.

[6] Foss N. J. The emerging knowledge governance approach: challenges and characteristics[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 14(29): 29-52.

[7] Tiwana A. An empirical study of the effect of knowledge integration on software development performance[J]. Information & Software Technology, 2004, 46(13): 899-906.

[8] Newell S., Tansley C., Huang J. Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: the importance of bridging AND bonding[J]. British Journal of Management, 2004, 15(SI): S43-S57.

[9] Pemsel S., Müller R., Söderlund J. Knowledge governance strategies in project-based organizations[J]. Long Range Planning, 2016, 49(6): 648-660.

[10] 王健友. 知识治理的起源与理论脉络梳理[J]. 外国经济与管理，2007，(06): 19-26.

Wang Jianyou. The origin and theoretical venation of knowledge governance[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2007, (06): 19-26.

[11] 任志安. 超越知识管理:知识治理理论的概念、框架及应用[J]. 科研管理，2007，28(1): 20-26.

Ren Zhian. Beyond knowledge management: the concept, frame and application of knowledge governance theory[J]. Science Research Management, 2007, 28(1): 20-26.

[12] Pemsel S., Müller R. The governance of knowledge in project-based organizations[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2012, 30(8): 865-876.

[13] Williamson O. E. The economic institutions of capitalism [M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.

[14] Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: the problem-solving perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(6): 617-632.

[15] Zhang P., Wen P., Zhang K. An empirical study on the knowledge governance choices and knowledge integration efficiency in work teams[C]. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Dalian, 2008.

[16] Hoetker G., Mellewigt T. Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: matching alliance governance to asset type[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(10): 1025-1044.

[17] Husted K., Michailova S., Minbaeva D. B., et al. Knowledge‐sharing hostility and governance mechanisms: an empirical test[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2012, 16(5): 754-773.

[18] Huang M. C., Chiu Y. P., Lu T. C. Knowledge governance mechanisms and repatriate's knowledge sharing the mediating roles of motivation and opportunity[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2013, 17(5): 677-694.

[19] Zhang Q., Zhou K. Z. Governing interfirm knowledge transfer in the Chinese market: the interplay of formal and informal mechanisms [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2013, 42(5): 783-791.

[20] Peltokorpi V., Tsuyuki E. Knowledge governance in a Japanese project-based organization[J]. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2006, 4(1): 36-45.

[21] Schroeder A., Pauleen D., Huff S. KM governance: the mechanisms for guiding and controlling KM programs[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2012, 16(1): 3-21.

[22] Fang S. C., Yang C. W., Hsu W. Y. Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: the perspective of knowledge governance[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2013, 17(6): 943-957.

[23] 王影, 梁祺. 组织知识治理模式研究[J]. 情报杂志，2012，(11): 181-186.

Wang Ying, Liang Qi. Research on organizational knowledge governance mode[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2012, (11): 181-186.

[24] Clifton N., Keast R., Pickernell D., et al. Network structure, knowledge governance, and firm performance: evidence from innovation networks and SMEs in the UK[J]. Growth & Change, 2010, 41(3): 337-373.

[25] 罗珉, 张晟义, 刘永俊. 高新技术企业知识治理绩效研究[J]. 科研管理，2010，31(3): 1-9.

Luo Min, Zhang Shengyi, Liu Yongjun. Research on knowledge governance performance of high-tech enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(3): 1-9.

[26] Wyborn C., Kerkhoff L., Dunlop M., et al. Future oriented conservation: knowledge governance, uncertainty and learning[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2016, 25(7): 1-8.

[27] 吴士健, 孙专专, 刘新民. 知识治理、组织学习影响组织创造力的多重中介效应研究[J]. 中国软科学，2017，(06): 174-183.

Wu Shijian, Sun Zhuanzhuan, Liu Xinmin. The multiple mediating effects of knowledge governance and organizational learning on organizational creativity. China Soft Science Magazine, 2017, (06): 174-183.