A study of the impact of heterogeneous location change of enterprises on environmental regulation

LAI Jun-Ming

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 61-70.

Lai Junming, Ouyang Ju

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In order to better explain the causes of the dilemma between investment inviting and environmental protection in backward or underdeveloped regions, an analysis was made under the FCVL model framework of the environmental policy, enterprise location change and internal transmission mechanism of environmental pollution, with location transfer activities of heterogeneous enterprises described in detail from a micro perspective. In addition, an analysis was also given regarding the formation of corresponding equilibrium locations and the explicit solution to pollution volume in the case of collaborative and non-collaborative environmental regulation policies, which provide theoretical support for further empirical research. The trade cost, which is a key factor in the regional transmission mechanism of environmental pollution, an analysis was made by means of GMM (Generalized Moment Method) of the dynamic panel data model of 38 industries in China′s industrial manufacturing during the 2010—2018 period. Studies have shown that the total capital size owned by enterprises has a direct positive impact on environmental regulation, and has an indirect impact on environmental regulation through the intermediate effects of the pollution volume per unit of product, consumer price index and total capital size. According to empirical studies, with a higher degree of trade freedom, non-collaborative environmental regulation will increase total pollution volume while collaborative environmental regulation will reduce total pollution volume.
Under the framework of the FCVL model with the inter-company vertical linkage between input and output, this paper, by establishing the theoretical model of corporate pollution and industrial agglomeration, explored the internal mechanism of environmental pollution and agglomeration and the impact of industrial agglomeration on the share of regional expenditure and environmental pollution volume with the hypothesis of corporate heterogeneity. According to the analysis in this paper, under the premise of industrial agglomeration and vertical linkage between enterprise input and output, there is no such a dilemma between investment inviting and environmental protection in backward or underdeveloped regions, but there appears a certain tendency of inter-regional "competition for growth", which put forward new requirements for the formulation of industrial relocation and regional coordination policies.
Based on studies in this paper, the conclusion of the FCVL model under corporate heterogeneity supports the role played by environmental regulation in environmental protection. The collaborative environmental regulation policy works better than the non-collaborative environmental regulation policy, which again, works significantly better than no environmental regulation. Therefore, from an overall economic perspective, the implementation of environmental protection policies based on regional cooperation is particularly important. Against the current context with frequent capital flows and the existence of vertical linkages between corporate intermediate inputs, the implementation of collaborative regulation policies can effectively reduce the circumvention of environmental regulation by polluting enterprises or industries and the appearance of "pollution havens". It is important to note that, in the case of a unified environmental regulation policy, attention should be paid to preventing local governments from twisting environmental regulation policies, particularly from impairing or not implementing environmental regulation policies by implicit or manipulative means.
Based on the conclusion of the study, it is obvious that for the overall economy, local protectionism measured by trade costs will result in lower overall expenditure and an increase in environmental pollution. Increased trade costs will lead to an increase in the intermediate consumption of products, as well as a hindrance to the functioning of agglomeration and scale economy, resulting in inefficient resource allocation. Therefore, the policy orientation is also obvious: to reduce the trade cost of a single domestic market to integrate the domestic market, increase industrial transfer and regional coordinated development, reduce trade costs from an institutional level, and provide institutional dividends for enterprise relocation and agglomeration through market integration. The enterprise relocation and agglomeration will further provide momentum and bonds for market integration. The interaction between the two makes market integration particularly important.

Key words

environmental regulation / FCVL model / location change / trade cost

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Lai Junming, Ouyang Ju. A study of the impact of heterogeneous location change of enterprises on environmental regulation[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(3): 61-70

References

[1]余传鹏,张振刚.异质知识源对中小微企业管理创新采纳与实施的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(2):92-100.

Yu Chuanpeng, Zhang Zhengang. The effect of heterogeneous knowledge on SME’s management innovation adoption and implementation[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T,2015,36(2):92-100.

[2]苏敬勤,林海芬.引进型管理创新过程机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(1):34-41.

Su Jingqin, Lin Haifen. Research on the process mechanism of introduced management innovation[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T,2010,31(1):34-41.

[3]Grohs R.,Wagner U.,Vsetecka S. Assessing the Effectiveness of Sport Sponsorships-An Empirical Examination [J]. Schmalenbach Business Review,2014(56):119-138.

[4]Ahluwalia R, Unnava H R, Burnkrant R E. The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2017,38(4):458-470.

[5]Roehm M nL,Tybout A M. When will a brand scandal spill over, and how should competitiors respond?[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2016,43(3):366-373.

[6]Dahlen M, Lange F. A disaster is contagious: how a brand in crisis affects other brands[J]. Journal of Advertising Research,2017,46(4):388-397.

[7]Lei J, Dawar N, Lemmink J. Negative spillover in brand portfolios: exploring the antecedents of asymmetric effects[J]. Journal of marketing,2008,72(3):111-123.

[8]Votola N L, Unnava H R. Spillover of negative information on brand alliances[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology,2016,16(2):196-202.

[9]Rim H,Song D. The Ability of Corporate Blog Communication to Enhance CSR Effectiveness: The Role of Prior Company Reputation and Blog Responsiveness[J].International Journal of Strategic Communication,2017,7,(3) : 165-185.

[10]Keh H T, Pang J. Customer reactions to service separation[J]. Journal of Marketing,2010,74(2):55-70.

[11]Marín L, Cuestas P J, Román S. Determinants of Consumer Attributions of Corporate Social Responsibility[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2015,138,(2) : 1-14.

[12]McCracken G. Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2017,12(16):310-321.

[13]Stipp H. and Shiavone N.P. Modeling the Impact of Olympic Sponsorship on Corporate Image [J]. Journal of Advertising Research,2017,36(4):22-27.

[14]Keller, W and Levinson, A. Environmental Compliance Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to U. S. States [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,2002,32(8):691-703.

[15]鲁耀斌,徐红梅. 技术接受模型的实证研究综述[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(3):93-99.

Lu Yaobin, Xu Hongmei. An empirical research on technology acceptance model[J]. R&D Management,2006,18(3):93-99.

[16]Fagerberg J, Mowery D C, Nelson R. The Oxford handbook of innovation[M]. Oxford University Press, 2005.

[17]石晓军,王骜然. 独特公司治理机制对企业创新的影响——来自互联网公司双层股权制的全球证据[J]. 经济研究,2017,1(1):149-164.

Shi Xiaojun, Wang Aoran. Impact of the specialty of corporate governance on innovation: Global evidence from the dual-class structure of internet firms[J]. Economic Research Journal,2017,1(1):149-164.

[18]刘启亮,罗乐,何威风,陈汉文.产权性质、制度环境与内部控制[J].会计研究,2012,3(3):52-61.

Liu Qiliang, Luo Le, He Weifeng, Chen Hanwen. Property rights, institutional environment and internal control[J]. Accounting Research,2012,3(3):52-61.

[19]袁建国,后青松,程晨.企业政治资源的诅咒效应——基于政治关联与企业技术创新的考察[J].管理世界,2015,1(1):139-155.

Yuan Jianguo, Hou Qingsong, Cheng Chen. The curse effect of corporate political resources: A study based on political relevance and enterprise technological innovation[J]. Management World,2015,1(1):139-155.

[20]Fournier S. Consumer and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research [J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2016,24(3):343-373.

[21]易靖韬,张修平,王化成.企业异质性、高管过度自信与企业创新绩效[J].南开管理评论,2015,6(6):101-112.

Yi Jingtang, Zhang Xiuping, Wang Huacheng. Enterprise heterogeneity, executive overconfidence and enterprise innovation performance[J]. Nankai Business Review,2015,6(6):101-112.

[22]Fang V W, Tian X, Tice S. Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation?[J]. The Journal of Finance,2014,69(5):2085-2125.

[23]陈修德,梁彤缨,雷鹏,秦全德.高管薪酬激励对企业研发效率的影响效应研究[J].科研管理,2015,9(9):26-35.

Chen Xiude, Liang Tongying, Lei Peng, Qin Quande. A study on the effect of executive compensation incentive on enterprise R&D efficiency[J]. Science Research Management,2015,9(9):26-35.

[24]Zhang A, Zhang Y, and Zhao R. A study of the R & D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003,31(3):444-464.

[25]Karwowski M, Lebuda I, Wisniewska E, et al. Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter?[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior,2013,47(3):215-232.

[26]Melitz, M. The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity [J]. Econometrica,2003,71(3):1695-1725.

[27]陈强远.异质性企业空间选择:机理与效应[M]北京:经济管理出版社,2016.

Chen qiangyuan. Spatial location of Heterogeneous firms: Mechanism and effects[M].Beijing:Economy & Management publishing house,2016.

[28]Patanakul P, Milosevic D. The effectiveness in managing a group of multiple projects: Factors of influence and measurement criteria[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2009,27(3):216-233.

[29]Richter A W, Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, et al. Creativeself-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2012,97(6):182-196.