Domestic studies on S&T societies need to be reintegrated urgently

Meng Fanrong, Chen Zitao, Yuan Meng, Wang Huan

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 72-79.

PDF(397 KB)
PDF(397 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 72-79.

Domestic studies on S&T societies need to be reintegrated urgently

  • Meng Fanrong1, Chen Zitao2, Yuan Meng1, Wang Huan3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

   S&T societies are a key force to cope with the risks of globalization, and also constitute an integral part of Chinese national governance system and national innovation system. After more than 40 years of development, a large number of relevant domestic studies have been accumulated although the content are fragmented, which need to be sorted out and summarized urgently. Taking 420 related literatures from CAJD as samples, this paper adopted the systematic literature review method to present the current situation of domestic studies  on S&T society from six perspectives, which are carrier of periodicals, institution of author, research object, research type, research content, and theoretical basis. The result indicated that the amount of domestic studies on S&T society published in journals is limited, and the number of papers published in high-level journals is relatively small. As for the institution of the authors, most of the research are produced by a single author or by multiple authors from the same institution, and more than half of the authors come from S&T society itself. In terms of research object, both domestic and foreign S&T society are involved. What′s more, studies on domestic S&T society covered three levels including national, local and individual. In terms of research type, domestic studies on S&T society contains 7 research types, including countermeasures suggestion, theoretical exploration, practical case study, working experience summary, historical review, foreign experience introduction and description of current status. The content of domestic societies on S&T study covers social function, academic function, S&T innovation function, organizational management, organization development, theoretical exposition and related policy. As for the theoretical basis, most domestic studies on S&T society do not rely on specific theories. Besides the commonly used governance theory, other scattered theories such as organization theory, evaluation theory and innovation theory are also adopted. However, high-level journal paper on S&T societies are still lacking which cannot construct a systematic theoretical framework to lead the field. On the other hand, the majority of relevant research are practice-oriented and lack of theoretical basis. The fundamental reason lies in the chaos of the core of the domestic S&T society research field. 
   To solve this problem, we proposed the "concept-element-theory" model to re-integrate related research.First of all, we take the connotation of concept as the core to grasp the essential attribute of S&T society as a specific organization. Second, we take the key elements as starting points such as the structure, function, ability and performance of S&T society. Third, we further integrate the organizational theory, the governance theory and the innovation theory as basic support. 
    Suggestions for the future studies are as follows. First, the research institutions and universities should full play to their theoretical advantages to help clarify the theoretical orientation and promote cross-theory integration. Second, it′s essential to strengthen the support of high-quality professional journals and cultivate to enhance the integration of theory and practice. Third, practitioners need to be encouraged to participate in the research dialogue actively, and more attention should be paid on the selecting and summarizing of the best practice.

Key words

S&T society / systematic literature review / theoretical model / domestic study

Cite this article

Download Citations
Meng Fanrong, Chen Zitao, Yuan Meng, Wang Huan. Domestic studies on S&T societies need to be reintegrated urgently[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(12): 72-79

References

[1] 张思光,刘玉强,徐芳.基于软系统方法论的政策效果评估研究—以促进科技社团承接政府职能的政策为例[J].科研管理,2018,39(S1):67-75.
[2] 鲁云鹏.科技社团治理:内涵、问题与实现[J].中国科技论坛,2019(11):1-9.
[3] 游玎怡,王海燕.科技社团参与科技类公共服务的现状与策略[J].科学学研究,2020,38(05):787-796.
[4] 孟凡蓉,李思涵,陈子韬.夯实科技社团理论研究,助力科技创新跨越发展[J].科技导报,2019,37(12):14-19.
[5] 刘春平.回眸百年再启程:中国科技社团发展的历史进程与主要贡献[J].科技导报,2019,37(09):38-44.
[6] 王春法.关于科技社团在国家创新体系中地位和作用的几点思考[J].科学学研究,2012,30(10):1445-1448.
[7] 周大亚.科技社团在国家创新体系中的地位与作用研究述评[J].社会科学管理与评论,2013(04):69-84.
[8] 张豪,张向前.我国科技类协会促进经济发展的价值分析[J].中国软科学,2015(06):35-44.
[9] 陈建国.政社关系与科技社团承接职能转移的差异——基于调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国行政管理,2015(05):38-43.
[10] 潘建红,武宏齐.论科技社团推动创新驱动发展战略的实践选择[J].求实,2016(09):46-53.
[11] 潘建红,张怀艺.基于结构-功能分析的科技社团推进国家治理[J].中国科技论坛,2018(12):9-15.
[12] 杨书卷.改革开放以来中国科技社团理论研究发展文献综述[J].中国非营利评论,2019,23(01):268-288.
[13] 邱璇.系统综述——一种更科学和客观的综述方法[J].图书情报知识,2010(01):15-19.
[14] 李子彪,张静,李林琼.科学共同体的演化与发展—面向“矩阵式”科技评估体系的分析[J].科研管理,2016,37(S1):11-18.
[15] 李研,李哲.科技类社会组织发展思路与对策研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(11):124-130.
[16] 张良,唐安.领导人身份特征、资源获取与能力建设:基于上海市科技学会的实证研究[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,32(02):63-71.
[17] 杨红梅.科技社团核心竞争力的认识模型及实现初探[J].科学学研究,2012,30(05):654-659.
[18] 赵立新.科技社团绩效评价四维框架模型研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(12):151-156.
[19] 徐顽强,史晟洁,张红方.供给侧改革下科技社团公共服务供给绩效研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(21):118-124.
[20] 孟凡蓉,陈光,袁梦,马天喜,陈子韬.世界一流科技社团综合能力评估指标体系设计研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38(11):1937-1943.
[21] 孟凡蓉.科技社会组织应在公共危机治理中发挥更大作用[J].科学学研究,2020,38(03):398-399.
[22] 李敏,刘雨梦,徐雨森.科学学会的组织资本与知识活动绩效的关系——以学科成长性为调节变量[J].技术经济,2019,38(01):38-47+80.
PDF(397 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/