Value co-creation, dynamic capabilities and ecological advantages of entrepreneurship incubation platforms

Chen Lingzi, Zhou Wenhui, Zhou Yifang

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 10-18.

PDF(422 KB)
PDF(422 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 10-18.

Value co-creation, dynamic capabilities and ecological advantages of entrepreneurship incubation platforms

  • Chen Lingzi1,2, Zhou Wenhui1, Zhou Yifang1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

   Entrepreneurship incubation platforms achieve entrepreneurship ecological advantages mainly based on platform enterprises. However, the existing literature has no strong explanation for the dynamic process of ecological advantages. Facing the urgency of reality and theoretical gap, through an exploratory case study of ‘Investment + Incubation’ process of Xiaomi, this paper attempts to explore how entrepreneurial incubation platforms achieve ecological advantages through value co-creation from the dynamic perspective of capabilities.
    This paper selects ‘Xiaomi and entrepreneurship enterprises’ as the research object for the following reasons: firstly, Xiaomi is a typically successful case of building ecological advantages, which has not been explained yet; secondly, the start-ups incubated by Xiaomi reach to 260, large size of research samples mean relatively universal; thirdly, Xiaomi incubation performance is outstanding, and the data is rich and easy to be available. As the analysis unit in embedded case study, there are two standards we choose for entrepreneurship enterprises: firstly, the entrepreneurship enterprise should be early established and relatively stable; secondly, the performance of entrepreneurship enterprise should be relatively significant. We conducted a five-and-a-half-year case study, we collected the first-hand date by depth interview, participatory observation and internal non-public information, as for the second-hand data which obtained in various ways like official website, social media, public speeches, publications, academic papers, media reports and so on, through the "triangle verification" we guaranteed the reliability and validity of case study.
   The study finds that following the logic of "value co-creation, dynamic capability, ecological advantage" can explain the influence mechanism of value co-creation of entrepreneurship incubation platform on ecological advantages, it goes through three stages: in the stage of demand co-identification, the entrepreneurship incubation platform and start-ups promote the formation of opportunity perception and realize ecological co-existence through communication and resource identification; In the stage of product co-development, the entrepreneurship incubation platform and start-ups promote the formation of model learning and realize ecological inter-growth through heart-to-heart means and resource allocation; in the stage of market co-promotion, the entrepreneurship incubation platform and start-ups promote the formation of market restructuring and realize ecological regeneration through exchange and resource optimization.
   Our research has important theoretical implications in several folds: Firstly, the existing literature splits the organic relationship between value co-creation, dynamic capability and ecological advantage studies, the paper sums up the theoretical model of business incubation platform based on them, which builds a dialogue bridge and provides a new explanation logic for the formation of entrepreneurship incubation platform′s ecological advantage. Secondly, the existing theory of ecological advantage is still in its infancy. Although the carrier of value creation transformed from value chain to value co-creation network, the process mechanism of value co-creation affecting ecological advantage has not been revealed yet. The paper opens up the black box of "ecological advantages of entrepreneurship incubation platforms" and digs out the connotation and evolution characteristics of different stages of entrepreneurship incubation platform′s ecological advantage. Finally, the existing dynamic capability theory is often used to explain the process of enterprises obtaining and maintaining competitive advantage in dynamic environment, but not used to explore the formation mechanism of ecological advantage and the special situation of entrepreneurial incubation platform. The paper uses dynamic capability as an intermediary variable to explain the realization process of entrepreneurial incubation platform′s ecological advantage, identifies how dynamic capabilities in different stages promote the dynamic evolution of ecological advantages, enrich and expand the theory of dynamic capabilities.
    Our findings also provide theoretical guidelines for the innovation and transformation of incubators: Firstly, large and medium-sized enterprises can try to be an entrepreneurship incubation platform, which can realize their own sustainable development meanwhile incubate the growth of start-ups. The entrepreneurship incubation platform should provide all-round resource support and authority. Secondly, with the help of entrepreneurship incubation platform, start-ups can break through the bound of opportunities and resources to improve the survival rate, start-ups should strengthen mutual cooperation, develop new products, services or explore new markets jointly, and build a symbiotic ecosystem; finally, the government should change the policy support for entrepreneurship incubation platform: from "blood transfusion" to "blood hematopoiesis" and "subsidy" to "follow-up investment", reduce the investment number of incubation based on government and increase the funding for incubator based on business, promote the upgrading of "double creation" service and form a new pattern of innovation and entrepreneurship.

Key words

entrepreneurship incubation platform / value co-creation / dynamic capability / ecological advantage

Cite this article

Download Citations
Chen Lingzi, Zhou Wenhui, Zhou Yifang. Value co-creation, dynamic capabilities and ecological advantages of entrepreneurship incubation platforms[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(12): 10-18

References

[1] Mian S, Lamine W, Fayolle A. Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge[J]. Technovation. 2016, 50-51: 1-12.
[2] Theodorakopoulos N, K. Kakabadse N, Mcgowan C. What matters in business incubation? A literature review and a suggestion for situated theorising[J]. Journal of Small Business & Enterprise Development. 2014, 21(4): 602-622.
[3] Eveleens C P, Van Rijnsoever F J, Niesten E M M I. How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2017, 42(3): 676-713.
[4] Mas-Verdú F, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Roig-Tierno N. Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2015, 68(4): 793-796.
[5] Soetanto D P, Jack S L. Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2013, 38(4): 432-453.
[6] 冯海红,曲婉. 社会网络与众创空间的创新创业——基于创业咖啡馆的案例研究[J]. 科研管理. 2019, 40(04): 168-178.
[7] 毕可佳,胡海青,张道宏. 孵化器编配能力对孵化网络创新绩效影响研究——网络协同效应的中介作用[J]. 管理评论. 2017, 29(04): 36-46.
[8] Pauwels C, Clarysse B, Wright M, et al. Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator[J]. Technovation. 2015, 50-51(SI): 13-24.
[9] 周文辉,陈凌子,邓伟,等. 创业孵化平台、创业者与消费者价值共创过程模型:以小米为例[J]. 管理评论. 2019, 31(04): 283-294.
[10] 董保宝,葛宝山,王侃. 资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径[J]. 管理世界. 2011(3): 92-101.
[11] 潘松挺,杨大鹏. 企业生态圈战略选择与生态优势构建[J]. 科技进步与对策. 2017, 34(21): 80-87.
[12] Meyer W A D. Ecosystem Advantage: How to Successfully Harness the Power of Partners[J]. California Management Review. 2012, 55(1): 24-46.
[13] 廖建文,崔之瑜. 企业优势矩阵:竞争VS生态[J]. 哈佛商业评论. 2016(7): 111-118.
[14] Sun M, Tse E. The Resource‐Based View of Competitive Advantage in Two‐Sided Markets[J]. Journal of Management Studies. 2008, 46(1): 45-64.
[15] Adner R. Ecosystem as structure[J]. Journal of Management. 2017, 43(1): 39-58.
[16] Kumar P, Dass M, Kumar S. From competitive advantage to nodal advantage: Ecosystem structure and the new five forces that affect prosperity[J]. Business Horizons. 2015, 58(4): 469-481.
[17] 陈占夺,齐丽云,牟莉莉. 价值网络视角的复杂产品系统企业竞争优势研究——一个双案例的探索性研究[J]. 管理世界. 2013, No.241(10): 156-169.
[18] 黄江明,丁玲,崔争艳. 企业生态位构筑商业生态竞争优势:宇通和北汽案例比较[J]. 管理评论. 2016, 28(05): 220-231.
[19] 徐鹏杰. 互联网时代下企业竞争范式的转变:从竞争优势到生态优势——以韩都衣舍为例[J]. 中国人力资源开发. 2017(5): 104-109.
[20] Li J, Chen L, Yi J, et al. Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce[J]. Journal of International Business Studies. 2019, 50(1).
[21] 周文辉,曹裕,周依芳. 共识、共生与共赢:价值共创的过程模型[J]. 科研管理. 2015, 36(08): 129-135.
[22] Vargo S L, Lusch R F. Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2016, 44(1): 5-23.
[23] Ng I, Vargo S L. Service-dominant (S-D) logic, service ecosystems and institutions: bridging theory and practice[J]. Journal of Service Management. 2018, 29(4): 518-520.
[24] Teece D J, Shuen G P A A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 1997, 18(7): 509-533.
[25] Yin R K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 5ed[M]. 2013.
[26] 韦影,王昀. 很复杂,但更精致——嵌入式案例研究综述[J]. 科研管理. 2017, 38(11): 95-102.
[27] 李高勇,毛基业. 案例选择与研究策略——中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2014)综述[J]. 管理世界. 2015(2): 133-136.
[28] 周文辉,杨苗,王鹏程,等. 赋能、价值共创与战略创业:基于韩都与芬尼的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理评论. 2017, 29(7): 258-272.
[29] Eisenhardt K M. Building Theories from Case Study Research[J]. Academy Of Management Review. 1989, 14(4): 532-550.
[30] 苏芳,毛基业,谢卫红. 资源贫乏企业应对环境剧变的拼凑过程研究[J]. 管理世界. 2016(08): 137-149.
PDF(422 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/