From innovation aversion to innovation tolerance: A study of influence of bank debt governance towards technological innovation

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11) : 184-192.

Wang Xu

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Rapid-changing competition environment has provided banks sufficient power to make an evolution from aversion to tolerance towards enterprises' technological innovation. This paper has analyzed the impact of bank debt governance upon corporations' technological innovation capability, and then examined the mediation effects of agency cost and innovation input to identify the transmission path between debt governance and innovation. The results show that:(1) Bank debt governance can enhance corporations' innovation capability, which proves banks begin to be tolerant or supportive of innovation behavior. (2) Agency cost has a significant mediation effect between bank governance and innovation capability, which means bank debt governance can promote corporations innovation capability through governance optimization. (3) The mediation effect of innovation input is not significant. Not only have these results broadened pecking order theory of financing and bank monitoring theory, but also provided scientific evidence of technological innovation practice for corporations.

Key words

bank debt governance / innovation tolerance / technological innovation capability / impact path

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Wang Xu. From innovation aversion to innovation tolerance: A study of influence of bank debt governance towards technological innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(11): 184-192

References

[1]李汇东,唐跃军,左晶晶.用自己的钱还是用别人的钱创新?基于中国上市公司融资结构与公司创新的研究[J].金融研究,2013,(2):170-183.Li Huidong, Tang Yuejun, Zuo Jingjing. Which is better for innovation investment, our own money or others'?[J]. Journal of Financial Research,2013,(2):170-183. [2] Myers S C. Capital structure puzzle[J]. Journal of Finance,1984,39(3):575-592. [3] Opler T C. Titman, S. Financial distress and corporate performance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1994,49(3):1015-1040. [4]简泽.银行债权治理、管理者偏好与国有企业的绩效[J].金融研究,2013,(1):135-148.Jian Ze. Bank debt governance, managerial performance and performance of SOEs[J]. Journal of Financial Research,2013,(1):135-148. [5]周艳菊,邹飞,王宗润.盈利能力、技术创新能力与资本结构-基于高新技术企业的实证分析[J].科研管理,2014,35(1):48-57.Zhou Yanju, Zou Fei, Wang Zongrun. Relations among profitability, technology innovation capability and capital structure-An empirical analysis based on high-tech firms[J].Science Research Management, 2014,35(1):48-57. [6] O'Sullivan M. The innovation enterprise and corporate governance[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2000,24(4):393-416. [7] Jensen Michael C. Agency costs of free cash flow,corporate finance and takeovers[J].American Economic Review,1986,76,(3):323-329. [8] Diamond D. Financial intermediation and delegated Monitoring[J].Review of Economic Studies,1984,51(3):393-414. [9] Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities:The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,(28):1319-1350. [10] Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J].Journal of Management,1991,(17):99-120. [11]焦豪,魏江,崔瑜.企业动态能力构建路径分析:基于创业导向和组织学习的视角[J].管理世界,2008,(4):91-106. Jiao Hao, Wei Jiang, Cui Yu. An analysis of build paths of enterprises' dynamic capability:Perspective based on entrepreneurial orientation and organization learning. Management World, 2008,(4):91-106. [12] Scherer F M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions[J]. American Economic Review, 1965, 55(5):1097-1125. [13] Lach S, Schankerman M. Dynamics of R&D and investment in the scientific sector[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97(4):880-904. [14] Hall B H. The financing of research and development[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2002,18(1):35-51. [15] Hart O, Moore J. Debt and seniority:An analysis of the role of hard claims in constraining management[J].American Economic Review,1995,85(3):567-585. [16]王旭.企业生命周期、债权人动态治理与代理成本[J].重庆大学学报,2013,19(5):79-85.Wang Xu. Corporations' life cycle, creditors' dynamic governance and agency cost[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition),2013,19(5):79-85. [17]周方召,符建华,仲深.外部融资、企业规模与上市公司技术创新[J].科研管理,2014,35(3):116-122.Zhou Fangzhao, Fu Jianhua, Zhong Shen. External financing,firm size and technological innovation of public company[J]. Science Research Management, 2014,35(3):116-122. [18] David B Audretsch, Erick E Lehmann. Financing high-tech growth:The role of banks and venture capitals[J].Schmalenbach Business Review, 2004,56(4):340-357. [19]樊钱涛.知识源、知识获取方式与产业创新绩效研究——以中国高技术产业为例[J].科研管理,2011,32(5):29-35.Fan Qiantao. Knowledge source, knowledge acquisition, and industry innovation performance:The case ofChina's high-tech industries[J]. Science Research Management, 2011,32(5):29-35. [20] Croby M. Patents,Innovation and growth[J]. The Economic Record,2000,234(76):255-262.