Selecting cooperative innovation is the optimum game development strategy, with which an enterprise realize its strategic objectives and obtains the technological breakthrough. Cooperative partner's assessment and selection is the primary link, it decides the efficiency and effect of cooperative innovation to a certain extent. In order to be scientifically effective and easy to realize the choice of the cooperative innovation partner, this paper combines PSO and ameliorated TOPSIS Methodtogether and proposes a new method for solving multiple attribute decision limited scheme -based on PSO fixed weight and ameliorated TOPSIS method. To establish a nonlinear programming problem about weight, according to the index weight of TOPSIS method, through the optimal and with the index for standard minimum sum object distance,present its mathematical programming model, and use PSO to determine the weight of the index; on this basis, in order to overcome the shortage of the traditional TOPSIS method, based on set pair analysis relative degree, set the ideal point and negative ideal point as set of oppositionabout certain and uncertain system, in examining the relative degree of alternatives and ideal point or negative ideal point, fully considering the existence of the opposite set,establishes comprehensive evaluation model of ameliorated TOPSIS method based on relative degrees, and applies it in the empirical analysis on the selection of the new technology innovative cooperation partner for H automobile group, and verifies the rationality and validity of the method.
Key words
cooperative innovation /
partner selection /
PSO /
weight /
connection degree /
ameliorated TOPSIS method
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 阮国祥, 毛荐其.合作创新伙伴选择的ANP方法研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2007, 24(11):31-33.
[2] Sheu Hua Chen, Pei Wen Wang, Chien Min Chen, Hong Tau Lee.An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 58(2):278-287.
[3] 曾德明, 华金科, 孙耀吾.基于技术标准的企业协作研发伙伴选择研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2005(11):39-43.
[4] 桂黄宝, 赵付民.基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)的合作技术创新伙伴选择研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(09):50-54.
[5] 王伟立, 杨育, 王明恺, 宋李俊.基于RS和SVM的客户协同创新伙伴选择[J].计算机工程与应用, 2007, 43(29):245-249.
[6] 林向义, 张庆普, 罗洪云.知识创新联盟合作伙伴选择研究[J].中国管理科学, 2008(10):404-408.
[7] 王晓新, 邹艳, 叶金福.企业合作创新伙伴选择的多层次优属度评价[J].科技进步与对策, 2008, 25(7):55-67.
[8] 杨建君, 梅晓芳, 陈曼.合作创新的伙伴选择:一个综合评价体系[J].科技管理研究, 2009(1):6-9.
[9] 孙圣兰, 陈雯, 吴祈宗.突破性技术创新研发联盟伙伴选择研究[J].数学的实践与认识, 2010, 40(16):25-30.
[10] 戴彬, 屈锡华, 李宏伟.基于模糊综合评价的技术创新合作伙伴选择模型研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(1):120-123.
[11] Kennedy J, Eberhart R.Particle swarm optimization[A].Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks[C].Perth, Australia.1995, 1942-1948.
[12] 杨竹莘.基于集对分析的地区经济发展水平综合评价研究—以环渤海地区为例[J].数学的实践与认识, 2009, 39(2):10-19.
[13] 张目, 周宗放.一种基于联系度的改进TOPSIS法[J].系统工程, 2008, 26(8):102-107.
[14] 张目, 周宗放.我国高技术产业自主创新能力分行业动态评价研究[J].软科学, 2010, 24(6):1-5.