Network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance：Based on the perspective of global manufacturing network and local cluster network integration

Hu Baoliang; Fang Gang

Science Research Management ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11) : 18-26.

Hu Baoliang, Fang Gang

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Based on the perspective of the integration of Global Manufacturing Network (GMN) and Local Cluster Network (LCN), the hypotheses of relationship among network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance are proposed, and these hypotheses are tested by using hierarchical multiple regressions analysis with data collected from 173 firms. The results show that the scope and depth of knowledge search play the mediative roles in the relationship between GMN position and innovation performance. The results also suggest that LCN position has a supplement effect on the GMN position, namely together with GMN position, it has a positive impact on knowledge search with GMN position; it plays a moderative role in the impact of GMN position on innovation performance through the search depth. Finally, the theoretical contributions, management implications, and research suggestions are discussed.

Key words

network position / knowledge search / innovation performance / GMN / LCN

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Hu Baoliang, Fang Gang. Network position, knowledge search, and innovation performance：Based on the perspective of global manufacturing network and local cluster network integration[J]. Science Research Management. 2013, 34(11): 18-26

References

[1] Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5):996-1004.
[2] Wasserman, S., Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[3] Kim, C., Park, J.H. The global research-and-development network and Its effect on innovation[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2010,18(4):43-57.
[4] Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., Babakus, E., Kedia, B. L. Learning from international business affiliates: developing resource-based learning capacity through networks and knowledge acquisition[J]. Journal of International Management, 2010(16):262-274.
[5] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里. 企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效—一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界,2010(5):118-129.
[6] 王晓娟.知识网络与集群企业创新绩效--浙江黄岩模具产业集群的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):874-879,867.
[7] Chesbrough, H. Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
[8] Kaisa, H., Paavo, R., Tiina, J. Exploring open search strategies and their impact on innovation performance[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2011, 15(3):525-541.
[9] Katila, R., Ahuja, G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6):1183-1194.
[10] Laursen, K., Salter, A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2):131-150.
[11] Malecki, E.J. Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: Open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation Management, 2011, 14(1):36-59.
[12] Salman, N., Saives, A. Indirect networks: an intangible resource for biotechnology innovation[J]. R&D Management, 2005, 35(2):203-215.
[13] Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Van den Oord, A. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density[J]. Research Policy, 2008(37):1717-1731.
[14] Szulanski, G. Exploring stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996(17):27-43.
[15] Pillai, K.G. Networks and competitive advantage: a synthesis and extension[J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2006(14):129-145.
[16] Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., Van den Oord, A. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(7):1016-1034.
[17] Burt, R. S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2): 349-399.
[18] Cohen, W., Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capability: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1):128-152.
[19] Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1979(1):215-239.
[20] Bonacich, P. Power and centrality: A family of measures[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1987(92):1170-1182.
[21] Alegrea, J., Chiva, R. Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test[J]. Technovation, 2008(28):315-326.
[22] Yang, M.L., Wang, A.M.L., Cheng, K.C. The impact of quality of IS information and budget slack on innovation performance[J]. Technovation, 2009(29):527-536.