The innovation efficiency of industry-university-research institutioncollaboration and its influence factors

Xiao Dingding, Zhu Guilong

Science Research Management ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) : 11-18.

PDF(1072 KB)
PDF(1072 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1) : 11-18.

The innovation efficiency of industry-university-research institutioncollaboration and its influence factors

  • Xiao Dingding, Zhu Guilong
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on the panel data of the Industry-University-Research institution Collaboration (IURC) in Guangdong Province from 2005 to 2009, the innovation efficiency of 260 companies is empirically evaluated using the stochastic frontier model, and the key factors influencing IURC efficiency are researched from the system perspective. The results show that the cooperative innovation efficiency in the sample period is still low but is steadily increasing; the influence effect and path are diverse among key-factors in the system. Entrepreneurship, external technology dependency, and government subsidy have a significantly positive effect on IURC efficiency, among them government subsidy has a long-acting effect on it; the cooperation pattern shows a significant negative impact on IURC efficiency, while export orientation has a higher non-efficiency impact degree. The impact of industry differences on IURC efficiency is unable to pass the significance test. Finally, the limitations and future directions are discussed according to the related theory and practice.

Key words

IURC / innovation efficiency / synergic innovation / stochastic frontier model

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xiao Dingding, Zhu Guilong. The innovation efficiency of industry-university-research institutioncollaboration and its influence factors[J]. Science Research Management. 2013, 34(1): 11-18

References

[1] 郭斌,谢志宇,吴惠芳.产学合作绩效的影响因素及其实证分析[J].科学学研究,2003,21(S):140-147.
[2] R.Salomon.Does knowledge spill to leaders or laggards? Exploring industry heterogeneity in learning by exporting[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008, 39(1):132-150.
[3] J.Fernando, J.Mikel, L.Zofíoc, E.Castro. Evaluating research efficiency within National R&D Programmes[J]. Research Policy, 2011(40):230-241.
[4] 王秀丽,王利剑.产学研合作创新效率的DEA评价[J].统计与决策,2009(3): 54-56.
[5] 刘民婷,孙卫.基于DEA方法的产学研合作效率评价研究—以陕西省制造业为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(3):11-15.
[6] P.Brimble, R.Doner.University-industry linkages and economic development: The case of Thailand[J].World Development,2007,35(6):1021-1036.
[7] M. Farrell. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1957, 120 (3):253-290.
[8] 白俊红,江可申,李靖.应用随机前沿模型评测中国区域研发创新效率[J].管理世界,2009(10):51-61.
[9] Kunbhakar S, Lovell C. Stochastic frontier analysis [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[10] Battese E, Coelli T. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data[J]. Empirical Economics, 1995,(2): 325~332.
[11] 吴延兵.组织研发、技术引进与生产率—基于中国地区工业的实证研究[J].经济研究,2008(8):51-64.
[12] R.Bekkers, M.Isabel, F.Bodas. Analyzing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?[J], Research Policy.2008, 37(10): 1837-1853.
[13] A.Spyros, K.Ursina, W.Martin. University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about cooperation with private enterprises? [J], Research Policy.2008, 37(10): 1865-1883.
[14] R.Harrisa, Qian Cher Li, M.Trainor. Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions?[J]Research Policy, 2009, 38(1):192-205.
[15] 张涛,张若雪.人力资本与技术采用:对珠三角技术进步缓慢的一个解释[J].管理世界,2009(2):75-82.
[16] 安同良,施浩,L.Alcorta.中国制造业企业R&D行为模式的观测与实证[J].经济研究,2006(2):21-30.
PDF(1072 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/