The resources supplies' difference by different functional science parks

PDF(965 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9) : 35-43.

Yang Zhenning, Wu Jie

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Different functional Science Park provides resources to firms which is also different. The Science Parks are divided into five kinds; they are comprehensive function Science Park, basic research Science Park, technical research Science Park, high-tech product processing region as well as incubator. Using the scale design and the questionnaire survey to collect primary data, the ANOVA and EFA models of grouping sample are constructed, and the difference resources provided by different functional Science Park are discussed. The research demonstrated that Science Parks' functional difference has significant influence on resources' supply; these difference resources include the market opportunity, the talented person accumulative effect, the cluster's maturity, research resources, and competitive mechanism, etc. Based on the concrete Science Parks' functional classification, the fact that different functional Science Park provides different resource is discussed, and finally the corresponding policy proposal according to the research conclusion is put forward.

Key words

Science Park / functional classification / resource supply / difference analysis

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Yang Zhenning, Wu Jie. The resources supplies' difference by different functional science parks[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(9): 35-43

References

[1] 杨震宁,王以华. 国内外科技园的优势匹配及操作分工 [J]. 改革. 2008(2):93-98. [2] 钟书华. 科技园区管理 [M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005. [3] Castells Manuel, Peter Hall. Technopoles Mines and Foundries of the Information Economy [M]. In Technopoles of the World London Routledge, 1998. [4] 王缉慈. 创新的空间—企业集群与区域发展 [M]. 北京大学出版社,2008. [5] Flynn. D. M. A critical Exploration of Sponsorship, Infrastructure, and New organizations [J]. Small Business economics, 1993(5): 129-156. [6] Conceicao Vedocello, Science Parks and University-industry Interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force [J], Techonvation, 1997, 17(9): 491-502 [7] Rice, M.P, Co-production of Business Assistance in Business Incubators: An Exploratory Study [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002, 17: 163-187. [8] Jun Koo, Technology Spillovers, Agglomeration, and Regional Economic Development [J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2005(20): 99-115. [9] John Phillimore. Beyond the linear view of innovation in Science Park evaluation: an analysis of western Australian technology park [J]. Technovation, 1999(19): 673-680. [10] Donald S. Siegel, Paul Westhead, and Milk Wright. Assessing the impact of university Science Parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003(21): 1357-1369. [11] Hans L fsten and Peter Lindel f. Science Parks and growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets [J]. Research Policy, 2002(31): 859-876. [12] Mariagrazia Squicciarini. Science Parks' tenants versus out-of-park firms: who innovates more? Aduration model [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2008(33): 45-71. [13] 杨震宁,吕萍,王以华. 科技园的创新环境对园内企业绩效的影响[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008(7): 102-107. [14] Sherman, H.F. Assessing the intervention effectiveness of business incubation programs on new business start-up [J]. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 1999, 24 (2):35-49. [15] Pedhazur, E.J. and Schmelkin, L.P. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach [M]. Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991. [16] Klein, K.J., Danserau, F. and Hau, R.J. Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19: 195-229. [17] Nobuya Fukugawa, Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24: 381-400. [18] L fsten, H., Lindel f, P. Science parks in Sweden-Industrial renewal and development? [J]. R&D Management, 2001, 21 (1): 45-57. [19] Chun-An Chen. The Investigation for the Establishment of Science Parks: The Case of Taiwan [J]. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge. 2006, 8(1): 62-69. [20] Cooper, A.C. The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1985, 34 (3): 94-116. [21] 原长弘,贾一伟. 国内大学科技园区技术创业企业创新网络初步研究[J]. 科研管理,2005(6):26-31. [22] Carayannis, E.G., Popescu, D., Sipp, C., McDonald, S., Technological learning for entrepreneurial development in the knowledge economy (KE): case studies and lessons learned [J]. Technovation, 2006, 26(4): 419-443. [23] McAdam, M., McAdam, R., The networked incubator: the role and operation of entrepreneurial networking with the university science park incubator (USI) [J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2006, 7(2): 87-97. [24] Lee, S., Osteryoung, J., A comparison of critical success factors for effective Operations of University Business incubators in the United States and Korea [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2004, 42(4): 418-427. [25] Rothschild, L., Darr, A., Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation network [J]. Technovation, 2005, 25(1): 59-69. [26] Bollinger, L., Hope, K., Utterback, J. A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms [J]. Research policy, 1983, 12: 1-4.