Ultimate control, corporate governance,and overinvestment by local state-owned companies

Liu Xing, Lian Jun

Science Research Management ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8) : 105-112.

PDF(910 KB)
PDF(910 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8) : 105-112.

Ultimate control, corporate governance,and overinvestment by local state-owned companies

  • Liu Xing, Lian Jun
Author information +
History +

Abstract

By choosing Chinese local state-owned listed companies during the period of 2005~2008 as samples, from the perspective of free-cash-flow agency problems,the corporate governance effects of cash-flow rights and control rights are studied when local government is ultimate controller. The empirical results indicate that (1) only when cash-flow rights held by local government is at a higher level, the cash-flow rights have the incentive effect, which can bind the behavior of abusing free cash flow for over investment; However, when cash-flow rights is at a lower level, the incentive effect is not found. (2) the divergence between control rights and cash-flow rights has the entrenchment effect. However, when cash-flow rights held by local government is at a higher level, the cost of overinvestment for private benefits is increasing, therefore, the entrenchment effect becomes moderate accordingly. The study provides enlightenment for understanding the proxy conflict between the ultimate shareholder and external minority shareholders in local state-owned listed companies during the period of transition economies, and enriches empirical literatures involving the study on corporate governance under the control of government.

Key words

ultimate control / incentive effect / entrenchment effect / overinvestment

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liu Xing, Lian Jun. Ultimate control, corporate governance,and overinvestment by local state-owned companies[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(8): 105-112

References

[1] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. Corporate ownership around the word [J]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471-518. [2] Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L.H.P. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1-2):81-112. [3] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1-2):3-27. [4] Denis, D.K. and McConnell, J.J. International Corporate Governance [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2003, 38(1):1-36. [5] Bozec, Y. and Laurin, C. Large Shareholder Entrenchment and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Canada [J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2008, 35(1) & (2):5-49. [6] Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings [J]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(6):2741-2771. [7] Francis, F., Schipper, K., Vincent L. Earnings and Dividend Informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 39(2):329-360. [8] Dittrmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J. Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holding [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 83(3):599-634. [9] 沈艺峰,况学文,聂亚娟. 终极控股股东超额控制与现金持有量的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2008(1) :15-23. [10] Chong, B.S. The impact of divergence in voting and cash-flow rights on the use of bank debt[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2010, 18(2):158-174. [11] 王鹏,周黎安. 控股股东的控制权、所有权与公司绩效-基于中国上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2006(2): 88-98. [12] 程仲鸣,夏新平,余明桂. 政府干预、金字塔结构与地方国有上市公司投资[J]. 管理世界,2008(9): 37-47. [13] Jensen, M. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers [J]. American Economics Review, 1986, 76(5):323-329. [14] Lang L., R. Stultz and Walking R. A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: The case of Bidders Returns [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1991, 29(2):3315-3335. [15] Richardson, S. Overinvestment of Free Cash Flow [J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2006, 11(2-3):159-189. [16] 郝颖,刘星. 资本投向、利益攫取与挤占效应[J]. 管理世界,2009(5) :128-144. [17] 周黎安. 晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作-兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J]. 经济研究, 2004 (6) :33-40. [18] Li, H. and Zhou, L.A. Political Turnover and Economics Performance: The Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2005, 89(9-10):1743-1762. [19] 辛清泉,林斌,王彦超. 政府控制、经理薪酬与资本投资[J]. 经济研究,2007(8) :110-122. [20] Wei, J.K.C. and Zhang Y. Ownership Structure, Cash Flow, and Capital Investment: Evidence From East Asian Economies Before the Financial Crisis [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2008, 14(2): 118-132.
PDF(910 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/