Heterogeneous complementarity and technological innovation ofJapanese firms in the globalization

Abstract

Abstract: Japanese firms have been showing different characteristics in the innovation globalization. The patents of Japanese firms are analyzed to show whether or not they are performing the international wisdom of heterogeneous complementarity in the innovation. Patents from the database of OECD triadic patent families of five Japanese firms and two benchmark American firms in addition to all patent families within area H (Electrics) are analyzed. The results show that although Japanese firms have stronger centralization tendency comparing with their America rivals in innovation, in term of application of resources seeking and capability complementary strategies, Japanese firms stand the same position with their American counterparts. The meaning is that Chinese firms should be paid much attention not only to the backword status of Japanese firms in the innovation globalization, but also to their enterprise innovative strategy in the changing trends.

Key words: innovation, patent, heterogeneity, complementarity

CLC Number:

F124.3

Zhang Huayao, Shi Xiaokun. Heterogeneous complementarity and technological innovation ofJapanese firms in the globalization[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(7): 9-17.

References

[1] Dunning, J. H.. American investment in British industry[M]. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1958. [2] Vernon, R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics[J],1966, 80: 190-207. [3] Doz, Y. & Santos, J. F. P. On the management of knowledge: From the transparency of collocation and co-setting to the quandary of dispersion and differentiation . INSEAD working paper series, Fontainbleau, 1997. [4] Florida R. & Kenney M. The Globalization of Japanese R&D: The Economic Geography of Japanese R&D Investment in the United States[J]. Economic Geography, 1994,70(4): 344-369. [5] Langlois, R., 1992. Transaction-cost economics in real time[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1 (1), 99-127. [6] UNCTAD. World investment report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D . United Nations: New York, 2006 [7] Almeida, P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry (Winter special issue)[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17:155-165. [8] Kenney, M. & Florida, R. Beyond mass production: The Japanese system and its transfer to the U.S [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. [9] Patel, P., Vega, M. Patterns of internationalization of corporate technology: location versus home country advantages[J]. Research Policy, 1999, 28: 145-155. [10] Le Bas C. & Sierra C. Location versus home country advantages' in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals' locational strategies[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31: 589-609. [11] Patel, P. Localized production of technology for global market[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 19: 141-153. [12] Bartlett, C.A., Ghoshal, S. Managing innovation in the transnational corporation. Bartlett, C.A, Doz, Y., Hedlund, G.. Managing the global firm . London: Routledge. 1991. 215-255. [13] Granstrand, O. Internationalization of corporate R&D: a study of Japanese and Swedish corporations[J]. Research Policy,1999,28: 275-302. [14] Scherer, F.M. & Harhoff, D. Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes[J]. Research policy, 2000, 29: 559-566. [15] Helene D.& M. Khan. Triadic patent families methodology . STI working papers, OECD, 2004.