The investment decision model of knowledge chainat the two stages of research and development

Wu Shaobo, Gu Xin

Science Research Management ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11) : 45-51.

PDF(1195 KB)
PDF(1195 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11) : 45-51.

The investment decision model of knowledge chainat the two stages of research and development

  • Wu Shaobo1, Gu Xin2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The inputting decision process of research and development collaboration between the core enterprise and the agent in the knowledge chain is analyzed. In the collaboration process, the agent takes the responsibility of research in the basic stage and the core enterprise undertakes the innovation in the application and development stage. The research indicates that the higher the research stage benefits the core enterprise gains, the higher the elastic coefficient of input-output at the research stage is, the core enterprise gives more subsidies to the agent under sequential game. Both the core enterprise and the agent are willing to invest more under cooperative game than that under sequential game. Moreover, the distribution coefficient of cooperative rent from incremental innovation income produced by cooperative game is negatively correlated to the risk aversion degree, and it has nothing to do with the bargaining ability, meanwhile, the premium subsidy has a positive correlation to the risk aversion degree and the bargaining ability.

Key words

knowledge chain / research and development / investment decision

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wu Shaobo, Gu Xin. The investment decision model of knowledge chainat the two stages of research and development[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(11): 45-51

References

[1] 顾新,郭耀煌,李久平.社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003,24(5):44-48. [2] Argote,L.,Beckman,S.L.,Epple,D. The Persistence and Transfer of Learning in Industrial Settings [J]. Management Science,1990,(36):140-154. [3] C.W.Holsapple,M.Singh.The knowledge chain model:activities for competitiveness[J].Expert systems with Application,2001,(20):77-98. [4] TKCI(The Knowledge Company,Inc).Knowledge Chain Optimization Approach . http://www.knowledgecompanyinc.com,2009-12-28. [5] 徐建锁,王正欧,李淑伟. 基于知识链的管理[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2003,5(2):133-136. [6] 吴绍波,顾新. 知识链组织之间合作与冲突的稳定性结构研究[J].南开管理评论,2009,12(3):54-58,66. [7] 张军果,任浩. 供应链上下游企业合作研发博弈分析[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,41(2):206-210. [8] 李勇,张异,杨秀苔等. 供应链中制造商-供应商合作研发博弈模型[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):12-18 [9] Dyer J H,Singh H. The Relational View:Cooperative Strategy and Source of Interorganization Competitive Advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(4):660-679. [10] 熊运莲,熊中楷等. 基于效用理论的企业并购价格谈判的讨价还价模型[J].统计与决策,2005(10):16-18.
PDF(1195 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/