PDF(1144 KB)
Heterogeneous effects of tax preferential policies for high-tech enterprises under the innovation-driven development strategy
Cao Xiyang, Zhang Hangqi, Ni Jian
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 111-119.
PDF(1144 KB)
PDF(1144 KB)
Heterogeneous effects of tax preferential policies for high-tech enterprises under the innovation-driven development strategy
Enterprise innovation has become a core engine for cultivating new quality productive forces and achieving high-quality economic development. To effectively implement the innovation-driven development strategy, the Chinese government has utilized tax preferential policies as a crucial measure to incentivize enterprise R&D and innovation, with annual increases in tax reductions. However, issues such as an imbalanced R&D investment structure and inadequate policy implementation have hindered the full realization of China’s enterprise innovation potential. Therefore, based on data from Chinese listed companies, this paper innovatively introduced a machine learning-based heterogeneity analysis method, building upon the traditional PSM-DID method, to deeply explore the heterogeneous impact of tax preferential policies on enterprise innovation. The research found that, on one hand, tax preferential policies demonstrate a certain overall positive incentive effect on stimulating enterprise innovation investment activities and serve as an important policy tool for promoting the development of new quality productive forces in China; but on the other hand, some issues remain to be optimized in policy implementation. Specifically, many enterprises exploit tax incentives through policy arbitrage, significantly weakening the positive effects of the policy and even causing adverse consequences in some cases. Through machine learning analysis to identify the heterogeneous features of policy effects, it is found that the positive impact of tax preferential policies on patent quantity and quality is mainly concentrated in approximately 15% of enterprises. This indicated that many enterprises have not yet been able to fully and effectively utilize policy incentives to unleash their innovation potential. These under-benefited enterprises generally exhibit characteristics such as high R&D risk, R&D manipulation, and strong entrepreneurial control, warranting attention in subsequent policy optimizations and adjustments. Furthermore, the machine learning-based heterogeneity analysis method introduced in this study overcomes the limitations of traditional linear models, enabling a more accurate identification of heterogeneous policy effects, and will provide a new theoretical perspective and methodological reference for precise policy implementation and promoting the vigorous development of new quality productive forces.
tax preferential policy / enterprise innovation / heterogeneity / machine learning
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
李林木, 汪冲. 税费负担、创新能力与企业升级:来自“新三板”挂牌公司的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(11): 119-134.
|
| [8] |
刘行, 赵健宇. 税收激励与企业创新:基于增值税转型改革的“准自然实验”[J]. 会计研究, 2019(9): 43-49.
|
| [9] |
陈诗一, 吴绪成, 王川杰. 税收优惠、人力资本结构调整与高新技术企业创新[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2023(5):1-16.
|
| [10] |
刘诗源, 林志帆, 冷志鹏. 税收激励提高企业创新水平了吗?:基于企业生命周期理论的检验[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(6): 105-121.
|
| [11] |
陈洋林, 宋根苗, 张长全. 税收优惠对战略性新兴产业创新投入的激励效应评价:基于倾向评分匹配法的实证分析[J]. 税务研究, 2018(8): 80-86.
|
| [12] |
冯海红, 曲婉, 李铭禄. 税收优惠政策有利于企业加大研发投入吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(5): 665-673.
本文旨在考察政府税收优惠政策对企业研发投资的影响,采用2000-2012年我国28个制造行业大中型工业企业的面板数据进行回归分析,研究发现,在最优的政策力度门限区间内,政府税收优惠政策对企业研发投资有着显著的正向激励作用;而政策力度小于第一门限值时激励作用较为微弱,大于第二门限值则产生反效果。此外,较大的企业规模、较低的国有产权比例和较强的知识技术密集度均有利于税收优惠政策引导企业研发投资作用的发挥。
|
| [13] |
林洲钰, 林汉川, 邓兴华. 所得税改革与中国企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(3): 111-123.
|
| [14] |
杨国超, 刘静, 廉鹏, 等. 减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(8): 110-124.
|
| [15] |
杨国超, 芮萌. 高新技术企业税收减免政策的激励效应与迎合效应[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9): 174-191.
|
| [16] |
何晴, 刘净然, 范庆泉. 企业研发风险与补贴政策优化研究[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(5): 192-208.
|
| [17] |
杨瑞龙, 侯方宇. 产业政策的有效性边界:基于不完全契约的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2019(10): 82-94.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
何晓斌, 朱丹阳, 高勇强. 分享型领导的两个维度与企业创新绩效[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(4): 747-758.
本文在总结领导力文献的基础上提出了分享型领导的概念。认为分享型领导是介于集中式领导和分布式领导之间的一种领导方式。分享型领导是领导者主动与员工分享企业利润、福利等利益,并鼓励下属员工主动参与企业日常决策的过程。分享型领导包括利益分享和决策分享两个维度。通过实证分析第八次全国私营企业调查获得的全国代表性数据发现,利益分享和决策分享都能显著提升企业的创新绩效。但是随着企业的成长,利益分享对于企业创新绩效的正面影响会减弱,而决策分享对企业创新绩效的促进作用会增强。企业股权集中度可以显著减弱利益分享对于企业创新绩效的正面作用。本文为拓展领导力概念,以及深入理解领导力与企业创新绩效的关系作出了贡献。
|
| [21] |
Chernozhukov et al. (2016) provide a generic double/de-biased machine learning (ML) approach for obtaining valid inferential statements about focal parameters, using Neyman-orthogonal scores and cross-fitting, in settings where nuisance parameters are estimated using ML methods. In this note, we illustrate the application of this method in the context of estimating average treatment effects and average treatment effects on the treated using observational data.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
熊风华, 黄俊. 股权集中度, 大股东制衡与公司绩效[J]. 财经问题研究, 2016(5): 69-75.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |