PDF(1097 KB)
Research on the impact of coupling coordination of digitalization and greening on high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises
Wang Shouhai, Guo Yingdong
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6) : 44-54.
PDF(1097 KB)
PDF(1097 KB)
Research on the impact of coupling coordination of digitalization and greening on high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises
Under the background of global digitalization and greening, how collaborative development of digitalization and greening empowers high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises is a critical problem to be solved urgently. Based on the data of A-share SRDI listed enterprises from 2011 to 2022, this paper empirically tested the impact of coupling coordination of digitalization and greening on high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises. The study found that coupling coordination of digitalization and greening can promote the high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises. The mechanism test found that coupling coordination of digitalization and greening promotes the high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises by promoting the improvement of absorption capacity, the upgrading of human capital and the improvement of investor attention. Heterogeneity analysis showed that at the firm level, the heterogeneity of cooperation culture has no significant impact on the relationship between the coupling coordination of digitalization and greening and the high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprise. At the regional level, geographical heterogeneity has a significant impact on the relationship between the coupling coordination of digitalization and greening and the high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises. The economic impact test showed that coupling coordination of digitalization and greening improves the total factor productivity of SRDI enterprises by promoting the high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises. The research conclusion is helpful to reveal the relationship between the coupling coordination of digitalization and greening and the high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises, and will provide empirical evidence and practical basis for promoting the collaborative development of digitalization and greening and empowering high-quality innovation of SRDI enterprises.
digitalization / greening / coupling coordination / SRDI enterprises / high-quality innovation
| [1] |
王彦林, 王莉. 新发展格局下“专精特新”企业创新能力提升的困境与出路[J]. 当代经济管理, 2023, 45(9):21-27.
|
| [2] |
郭彤梅, 李倩云, 张玥, 等. 专精特新企业数字化转型与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 技术经济, 2023, 42(5):68-78.
|
| [3] |
高智林, 谭文浩, 毛凌翔. 组织韧性与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(10):99-109.
VUCA时代背景下，创新是“专精特新”中小企业的灵魂，组织韧性是“专精特新”中小企业实现高质量发展的重要保障。以2013—2022年A股专精特新上市企业为样本，考察组织韧性对“专精特新”中小企业创新质量的影响及作用机制。结果发现，组织韧性对“专精特新”中小企业创新质量具有显著正向影响，即企业组织韧性越强，“专精特新”中小企业创新质量越高。作用机制研究表明：第一，组织韧性能够提升产品市场竞争地位，进而推动“专精特新”中小企业创新质量提升。第二，组织韧性能够降低企业融资成本，进而促进“专精特新”中小企业创新质量提升。第三，组织韧性能够提升行业市场化水平，进而改善“专精特新”中小企业创新质量。异质性检验发现，在国有企业、规模较大企业中，组织韧性对企业创新质量的影响更显著。此外，组织韧性能够促进“专精特新”中小企业创新质量，从而带动其全要素生产率提升。结论可丰富“专精特新”中小企业创新质量理论与实证研究，为企业借助组织韧性提高创新质量，从而实现高质量发展提供理论支撑。
|
| [4] |
王伟楠, 王凯, 严子淳. 区域高质量发展对“专精特新”中小企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2):32-44.
|
| [5] |
曹虹剑, 张帅, 欧阳峣, 等. 创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11):135-154.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
寇冬雪, 张彩云, 张小溪. 企业数字化赋能企业绿色化转型的方式:从信息披露到创新驱动[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(2):48-66.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
吾买尔江·艾山, 秦洋, 彭朝辉. 共同富裕视角下企业数字化与绿色化的协同关系研究[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(9):84-89.
|
| [13] |
周阳敏, 桑乾坤. 国家自创区产业集群协同高质量创新模式与路径研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(2):59-65.
中国已步入全球话语权竞争时代，我国高质量发展的必然要求是产业集群协同创新升级为协同高质量创新，而建设国家自创区是提升国家自主创新能力与全球话语权的战略举措，推动产业集群协同高质量创新是完善区域创新体系和构筑区域创新创业高地的重要路径。在梳理国家自创区产业集群协同创新状况与高质量创新特征的基础上，明晰基于价值链、产业链、知识链的产业集群协同高质量创新路径。在产业集群协同高质量创新模式方面，主要有企业引领型模式、人才支撑型模式、平台引导型模式、机构合作型模式，其是高质量创新的重要特质所在，也是理论创新之处。最后,针对如何进一步推动产业集群协同高质量创新发展，从整体规划、人才管理改革、科技创新管理、服务体系4个方面提出建议。
|
| [14] |
赵玉林, 刘超, 谷军健. 研发投入结构对高质量创新的影响:兼论有为政府和有效市场的协同效应[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021(1):55-64.
|
| [15] |
张同斌, 刘文龙, 王蕾. 高质量创新的溢出效应:企业供应链的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(11):38-54.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
张寒, 孟宪飞. 大学-产业界知识转移国际研究的热点主题和研究前沿:基于2010—2021年国际文献的科学知识图谱分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(10):103-122.
|
| [19] |
杨鹏, 尹志锋, 张志伟, 等. 企业数字技术应用与专利质量提升:理论机制与经验事实[J]. 统计研究, 2024, 41(5):98-110.
|
| [20] |
吴金柯, 卫晓明, 任晓姝. 企业绿色化转型与劳动收入份额:促进抑或挤出[J]. 产业经济研究, 2023(6):100-113+127.
|
| [21] |
徐露允, 曾德明, 李健. 知识网络中心势、知识多元化对企业二元式创新绩效的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(2):221-228.
In this study, we use patent data of China automobile industry from 1995 to 2011 in 738 firms. We discuss the impact of knowledge network centralization on firms’ exploitative and exploratory innovation performance. We also analyze the moderating effect of knowledge variety on the relationship of knowledge network centralization and innovation performance. The empirical results show that knowledge network centralization has a positive relationship with a firm’s exploitative innovation performance, and has a negative relationship with a firm’s exploratory innovation performance. Knowledge variety also positively affects firms’ exploitative and exploratory innovation performance. At the same time, knowledge variety weakens the negative relationship between knowledge network centralization and exploratory innovation performance, but the moderating effect of knowledge variety on the positive relationship between knowledge network centralization and exploitative innovation performance is not significant.
|
| [22] |
赵炎, 吕建林, 孟庆时. 组织创新网络联系特征与企业创新质量:知识组合能力与协调能力的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(5):65-71.
|
| [23] |
陈晓红, 邓全林, 关健. 效果推理逻辑对新创科技企业创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(12):69-78.
|
| [24] |
叶永卫, 李鑫, 刘贯春. 数字化转型与企业人力资本升级[J]. 金融研究, 2022(12):74-92.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
肖土盛, 孙瑞琦, 袁淳, 等. 企业数字化转型、人力资本结构调整与劳动收入份额[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(12):220-237.
|
| [27] |
卿陶. 人力资本投入与企业创新:来自中国微观企业数据的证据[J]. 人口与经济, 2021(3):108-127.
|
| [28] |
张辽, 林鑫涛. 企业金融化行为对创新质量的影响研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2022, 36(9):33-44.
|
| [29] |
马文聪, 叶阳平, 陈修德, 等. 政策“组合拳”更有效吗?我国创新政策组合对企业高质量创新的影响效应及其作用机制[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(3):60-72.
|
| [30] |
吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7):130-144+10.
|
| [31] |
周阔, 王瑞新, 陶云清, 等. 企业绿色化转型与股价崩盘风险[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(6):56-69.
|
| [32] |
王守海, 徐晓彤, 刘烨炜. 企业数字化转型会降低债务违约风险吗?[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(4):45-56.
|
| [33] |
陈晓珊, 刘洪铎. 投资者关注影响上市公司ESG表现吗:来自网络搜索量的经验证据[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2023(2):15-27.
|
| [34] |
We investigate how chief executive officers’ (CEOs) risk incentive (VEGA) affects firm innovation. To establish causality, we exploit compensation changes instigated by the FAS 123R accounting regulation in 2005 that mandated stock option expensing at fair values. Our identification tests indicate a positive and causal effect of CEOs’ VEGA on innovation activities. Furthermore, dampened managerial risk-taking incentive after the implementation of FAS 123R leads to a significant reduction in innovation related to firms’ core business and explorative inventions. It implies that managers diversify their innovation portfolios and decrease explorative inventions to curtail business risk when their risk-taking incentive is reduced.
|
| [35] |
In this paper, we document a positive effect of supplier-customer geographic proximity on supplier innovation. To establish causality, we explore plausibly exogenous variation in proximity caused by customer relocations. The positive effect of supplier-customer proximity on supplier innovation is stronger when customers are more innovative themselves, when suppliers and customers are closer in technological space, and when customers' demand accounts for a larger fraction of suppliers' total sales. These findings suggest that the feedback channel and the demand channel are likely underlying mechanisms through which supplier-customer proximity affects supplier innovation. Overall, our paper sheds new light on the real effect of supplier-customer relationship on corporate innovation.
|
| [36] |
唐要家, 王钰, 唐春晖. 数字化转型与数字化无形资本匹配的创新效应研究[J]. 经济学动态, 2023(12):41-57.
|
| [37] |
吴群, 韩天然, 姜南. 数字化与专利密集型产业技术创新协同研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(7):101-109.
|
| [38] |
李嘉欣, 武力超, 吕越. 全球价值链嵌入对企业不同类型技术创新的影响研究[J]. 产业经济研究, 2024(2):1-14+44.
|
| [39] |
赵宸宇, 王文春, 李雪松. 数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, 42(7):114-129.
|
| [40] |
陈克兢, 熊熊, 杨国超, 等. 投服中心行权与投资者信息劣势缓解:基于股价崩盘的视角[J]. 世界经济, 2022, 45(9):204-228.
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
李唐, 李青, 陈楚霞. 数据管理能力对企业生产率的影响效应:来自中国企业—劳动力匹配调查的新发现[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(6):174-192.
|
| [43] |
何瑛, 杨琳, 文雯. 非国有股东参与治理能提高国有企业融资行为的“市场理性”吗:来自资本结构动态调整的证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(1):118-133+158+134-135.
|
| [44] |
陈晓珊. 和为贵, 谐为美:数字化转型与企业合作文化[J]. 当代财经, 2024(8):85-99.
|
| [45] |
潘健平, 潘越, 马奕涵. 以“合”为贵?合作文化与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2019(1):148-167.
|
| [46] |
鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012,11(2):541-558.
|
| [47] |
宋德勇, 陈梁. 数字技术应用对企业全要素生产率的影响效应研究:兼论破解新“索洛悖论”[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(9):33-42.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
