Research on the impact of judicial digitalization reform on corporate innovation efficiency

Bao Qun, Liang Qianwen

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 180-192.

PDF(1245 KB)
PDF(1245 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 180-192. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.05.018  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.05.018

Research on the impact of judicial digitalization reform on corporate innovation efficiency

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Judicial digitalization is a crucial component of digital government construction and exerts a profound impact on the corporate innovation environment. Based on the quasi-natural experiment in "establishment of Internet courts", this study employed a multi-period DID approach to empirically examine the effect and mechanism of judicial digitalization reform on corporate innovation efficiency, using a sample of China's A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2022. The findings indicated that the establishment of Internet courts significantly enhances corporate innovation efficiency. This effect is primarily achieved through two mechanistic channels: strengthening intellectual property protection and optimizing the corporate credit environment. Furthermore, it is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, industries with low competition levels, and low capital-intensive enterprises. Additional analysis revealed that the promoting effect gradually strengthens over time. This study will provide micro-level evidence for how judicial digitalization empowers corporate innovation, while offering valuable decision-making insights for constructing an efficient and collaborative digital governance framework.

Key words

judicial digitalization / Internet court / innovation efficiency

Cite this article

Download Citations
Bao Qun , Liang Qianwen. Research on the impact of judicial digitalization reform on corporate innovation efficiency[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(5): 180-192 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.05.018

References

[1]
许年行, 王崇骏, 章纪超. 破产审判改革、债权人司法保护与企业创新:基于清算与破产审判庭设立的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2023(6):150-168.
XU Nianxing, WANG Chongjun, ZHANG Jichao. Judicial reform, creditor rights, and innovation: A quasi-random experiment of China's specialized court reform[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2023(6):150-168.
[2]
张海燕. 数字时代互联网法院的职能定位及其实现[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2024(5):91-102.
ZHANG Haiyan. The role and function of internet courts and its realization in the digital age[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024(5):91-102.
[3]
王华星, 雷舒怡, 李薇薇, 等. 数字司法保护如何影响企业技术创新:来自互联网法院设立的证据[J]. 财经科学, 2025(1):107-118.
WANG Huaxing, LEI Shuyi, LI Weiwei, et al. How does digital judicial protection affect enterprise innovation: Evidence from the establishment of internet courts[J]. Finance & Economics, 2025(1):107-118.
[4]
沈伟伟. 数字时代司法触达的发展、挑战与制度完善[J]. 政法论丛, 2024(6):86-97.
SHEN Weiwei. Development,challenge and institutional improvements of access to justice in the digital age[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2024(6):86-97.
[5]
王海成, 吕铁. 知识产权司法保护与企业创新:基于广东省知识产权案件“三审合一”的准自然试验[J]. 管理世界, 2016(10):118-133.
WANG Haicheng, LYU Tie. Judicial protection of intellectual property rights and corporate innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the “Three-trial-in-one” reform of intellectual property cases in Guangdong province[J]. Journal of Management World, 2016(10):118-133.
[6]
翟华云, 高蔚然, 李岱玲, 等. 地方环境立法、环境司法与企业绿色创新:基于立法与司法协同视角[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024, 39(1):106-116.
ZHAI Huayun, GAO Weiran, LI Dailing, et al. Local environmental legislation, environmental adjudication and corporate green innovation: Based on the synergistic perspective of legislation and justice[J]. Journal of Audit & Economics, 2024, 39(1):106-116.
[7]
黄俊, 陈信元, 赵宇, 等. 司法改善与企业投资:基于我国巡回法庭设立的经验研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2021, 21(5):1521-1544.
HUANG Jun, CHEN Xinyuan, ZHAO Yu, et al. Judicial improvement and corporate investment: Empirical analysis on the establishment of circuit court[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2021, 21(5):1521-1544.
[8]
陈增宝. 构建网络法治时代的司法新形态:以杭州互联网法院为样本的分析[J]. 中国法律评论, 2018(2):40-45.
CHEN Zengbao. Constructing the new judicial pattern in digital rule of law era: A case of Hangzhou internet court[J]. China Law Review, 2018(2):40-45.
[9]
潘越, 谢玉湘, 宁博, 等. 数智赋能、法治化营商环境建设与商业信用融资:来自“智慧法院”视角的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9):194-208.
PAN Yue, XIE Yuxiang, NING Bo, et al. Data-intelligence empowerment, law-based business environment and trade credit financing: Evidence from“Smart courts”[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(9):194-208.
[10]
安琪, 方炜, 冯启良. 制度创新对企业关键核心技术突破的影响[J]. 华东经济管理, 2025, 39(9):53-64.
AN Qi, FANG Wei, FENG Qiliang. Impact of institutional innovation on breakthroughs in key core technologies for enterprises[J]. East China Economic Management, 2025, 39(9):53-64.
[11]
姚树洁, 左舒雅, 殷红, 等. 数据规制与企业技术创新:理论及来自全球上市公司的经验证据[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2025(7):1-19.
YAO Shujie, ZUO Shuya, YIN Hong, et al. Data regulation and corporate technological innovation: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from global listed companies[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2025(7):1-19.
[12]
张文显. 推动数字司法全方位深层次高质效融入数字治理体系[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2024, 30(2):2.
ZHANG Wenxian. Promoting the comprehensive, in-depth, and high-quality integration of digital justice into the digital governance system[J]. Law and Social Development, 2024, 30(2):2.
[13]
周洲, 夏晓宇, 李雅梦. 法律保护能否提升企业创新质量?[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(4):127-135.
ZHOU Zhou, XIA Xiaoyu, LI Yameng. Can legal protection improve the quality of enterprise innovation?[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(4):127-135.
[14]
郑曼妮, 郑佳仪. 智慧法院与企业商业信用:基于互联网法院设立的经验证据[J]. 统计研究, 2024, 41(9):138-149.
ZHENG Manni, ZHENG Jiayi. Smart courts and corporate trade credit: Empirical evidence based on the establishment of the internet courts[J]. Statistical Research, 2024, 41(9):138-149.
[15]
韦倩, 韦祎. 知识产权司法保护、技术创新与专利制度利益平衡[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(6):44-55.
WEI Qian, WEI Yi. Judicial protection of intellectual property rights, technological innovation, and the interest balance of the patent system[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2023(6):44-55.
[16]
庄佳强, 王浩, 张文涛. 强化知识产权司法保护有助于企业创新吗:来自知识产权法院设立的证据[J]. 当代财经, 2020(9):16-27.
ZHUANG Jiaqiang, WANG Hao, ZHANG Wentao. Does strengthening the juridical protection of intellectual property contribute to corporate innovation? Evidences from the establishment of courts for intellectual property right cases[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics,2020(9):16-27.
[17]
郑攀攀, 庄子银. 知识产权司法保护专门化与企业数字创新[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(5):1501-1521.
Abstract
文章以2008-2020年A股上市公司为研究对象, 创新性地构建企业数字创新指数, 实证检验了知识产权法院设立带来的"知识产权司法保护专门化效应"对企业数字创新的影响. 研究发现: 1) 知识产权法院设立对企业数字创新具有显著促进效应; 2) 知识产权法院设立主要促进企业数字商业模式创新; 3) 知识产权法院设立会通过优化数字创新司法环境、 降低数字创新溢出损失及缓解企业外部融资约束等机制促进企业数字创新; 4) 知识产权法院设立对小规模、 非国有及低竞争行业企业数字创新的促进作用更为显著; 5) 知识产权法院设立显著提升了数字创新(尤其是数字商业模式创新)企业的市场价值.
ZHENG Panpan, ZHUANG Ziyin. Specialization in judicial protection of intellectual property and digital innovation of enterprises[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2024, 44(5):1501-1521.
[18]
权小锋, 尹洪英. 中国式卖空机制与公司创新:基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2017(1):128-144+187-188.
QUAN Xiaofeng, YIN Hongying. Chinese short selling mechanism and corporate innovation: A natural experiment from Chinese margin trading program[J]. Journal of Management World, 2017(1):128-144+187-188.
[19]
宋常, 何硕颖, 毕功兵, 等. 司法“去地方化”与企业全要素生产率:来自最高人民法院设立巡回法庭的证据[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2024, 44(7):1-14.
SONG Chang, HE Shuoying, BI Gongbing, et al. Judicial delocalization and firm-level total factor productivity: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts by the Supreme People's Court[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2024, 44(7):1-14.
[20]
SUN L, ABRAHAM S. Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225(2):175-199.
[21]
CENGIZ D, DUBE A, LINDNER A, et al. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134(3):1405-1454.
We estimate the effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs using 138 prominent state-level minimum wage changes between 1979 and 2016 in the United States using a difference-in-differences approach. We first estimate the effect of the minimum wage increase on employment changes by wage bins throughout the hourly wage distribution. We then focus on the bottom part of the wage distribution and compare the number of excess jobs paying at or slightly above the new minimum wage to the missing jobs paying below it to infer the employment effect. We find that the overall number of low-wage jobs remained essentially unchanged over the five years following the increase. At the same time, the direct effect of the minimum wage on average earnings was amplified by modest wage spillovers at the bottom of the wage distribution. Our estimates by detailed demographic groups show that the lack of job loss is not explained by labor-labor substitution at the bottom of the wage distribution. We also find no evidence of disemployment when we consider higher levels of minimum wages. However, we do find some evidence of reduced employment in tradeable sectors. We also show how decomposing the overall employment effect by wage bins allows a transparent way of assessing the plausibility of estimates.
[22]
祝继高, 陆正飞. 产权性质、股权再融资与资源配置效率[J]. 金融研究, 2011(1):131-148.
ZHU Jigao, LU Zhengfei. Nature of ownership, equity refinancing, and resource allocation efficiency[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2011(1):131-148.
PDF(1245 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/