PDF(1051 KB)
Research on the impact of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Promotion Law on the innovation boundary of enterprises
Zhou Yuzhong, Wu Bo, Wang Lun, Luo Qianqian
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 170-179.
PDF(1051 KB)
PDF(1051 KB)
Research on the impact of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Promotion Law on the innovation boundary of enterprises
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are the new force of innovation and the backbone of China's high-quality development. Evaluating the economic effects of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law is of great significance for promoting innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. This paper empirically tested the impact of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law on the innovation boundary of enterprises based on the data of SMEs listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares from 2013 to 2022. It was found that the implementation of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law has significantly promoted the expansion of innovation boundaries for enterprises, and the Law has also promoted the expansion of enterprise capability boundaries. From the perspective of internal mechanisms and boundary conditions, the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law has eased financing constraints, corrected resource misallocation, and improved enterprise innovation capabilities; However, the "Matthew effect" of the digital economy development has weakened the positive impact of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law on expanding the innovation boundaries of enterprises. The heterogeneity analysis found that in non-state-owned enterprises, manufacturing enterprises, and regions with higher levels of intellectual property protection, the effect of the Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law on expanding the boundaries of enterprise innovation is more significant. This paper has revealed the role of legal factors in expanding the innovation boundaries of SMEs, enriched the motivation theory of SMEs' innovation, and will provide important insights for the government on how to support the innovative development of SMEs.
Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Promotion Law / innovation boundary / financing constraint / resource mismatch / digital economy development level
| [1] |
陈金勇, 汪小池, 长昊东, 等. 专精特新认定政策与中小企业技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3): 20-30.
|
| [2] |
傅俊英, 彭喆, 郑佳, 等. 基于专利异构网络的中小企业潜在合作伙伴研究:以石墨烯领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(4): 391-401.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
沈坤荣, 林剑威, 傅元海. 网络基础设施建设、信息可得性与企业创新边界[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(1): 57-75.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Building on the seminal work of Thomas J. Allen, we contribute to the emerging microlevel theory of knowledge recombination by examining how individual-level characteristics of inventors affect the breadth of their technological recombinations. Our data set combines information from 30,550 European patents with matched survey data obtained from 1,880 inventors. The analysis supports the view that inventors with a scientific education are more likely to generate patents that span technological boundaries (in our case, 30 broad, top-level technological domains) than inventors with an engineering degree. A doctoral degree is associated with increased recombination breadth for all groups of inventors. The breadth of an inventor's technological recombinations diminishes with increasing temporal distance to his education, but the differences between scientists and engineers persist over time. Our findings provide several new insights for research on inventors, the literature on organizational learning and innovation, and strategy research.
|
| [10] |
赵静, 栾甫贵. 数字经济、研发要素流动与企业创新边界[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(2): 183-188.
|
| [11] |
王瑛, 李博. 全球创新网络融入、动态能力与企业创新边界[J]. 长白学刊, 2024(2): 98-113.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
杨芳, 张和平, 孙晴晴, 等. 企业数字化转型对新质生产力的影响[J]. 金融与经济, 2024(5): 35-48.
|
| [14] |
赵逖. 创新要素集聚促进数字全球价值链嵌入了吗?[J]. 企业经济, 2024, 43(2): 125-136.
|
| [15] |
陈胜蓝, 王鹏程, 马慧, 等. 《中小企业促进法》的纾困效应:产品市场表现视角[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(9): 181-205.
|
| [16] |
王敏, 李兆伟. 数字普惠金融与企业创新:理论逻辑与实证检验[J]. 管理学刊, 2023, 36(1): 102-119.
|
| [17] |
安强身, 张笑. 信号传递、声誉约束与投资风险缓释[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2020(5): 92-101.
|
| [18] |
白俊红, 刘宇英. 对外直接投资能否改善中国的资源错配[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(1): 60-78.
|
| [19] |
张文文, 景维民. 数字经济监管与企业数字化转型:基于收益和成本的权衡分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(1): 5-24.
|
| [20] |
周羽中, 王黎明. 数字时代商业银行对科创型企业全生命周期金融服务创新研究[J]. 当代经济管理, 2022, 44(9): 91-96.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
张庆垒, 施建军, 刘春林, 等. 技术多元化、行业竞争互动与双元创新能力[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(9): 71-83.
|
| [23] |
马永红, 赵丹, 倪惠莉. 创新开放度对企业创新边界的影响研究:基于网络聚合度的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(12): 11-18.
|
| [24] |
陈胜蓝, 王鹏程, 马慧, 等. 《中小企业促进法》的稳就业效应:基于政府信用体系建设视角[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(9): 52-68.
|
| [25] |
赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展:来自中国城市的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10): 65-76.
|
| [26] |
孙雪娇, 翟淑萍, 于苏. 柔性税收征管能否缓解企业融资约束:来自纳税信用评级披露自然实验的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(3): 81-99.
|
| [27] |
杨传喜, 王修梅, 王亚萌. 农业科技资源错配对全要素生产率影响:基于门槛效应的实证研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(1): 120-126.
|
| [28] |
赵文, 赵会会, 吉迎东. 双元创新跃迁与企业失败:社会关系网络的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(1): 124-133.
|
| [29] |
郭江山, 刘园. 商业银行跨区经营与企业创新:基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2020(5): 25-33.
|
| [30] |
王黎明, 周羽中. 美国反垄断法在知识产权领域的应用及启示[J]. 法治论坛, 2019(4): 69-80.
|
| [31] |
许为宾, 唐青舟, 李欢. 知识产权保护与企业数字化转型:基于知识产权示范城市的准自然实验[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(10): 53-61.
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
曹虹剑, 张帅, 欧阳峣, 等. 创新政策与专精特新中小企业创新质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11): 135-154.
|
| [34] |
陈炳亮. 不同学派的企业边界理论评析与研究展望[J]. 社会科学, 2011(10): 54-61.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |