Research on the influencing mechanism of science and technology insurance on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises

Pan Guangxi, Guo Bing, Zhao Hulin

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 150-159.

PDF(1129 KB)
PDF(1129 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 150-159. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.05.015  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.05.015

Research on the influencing mechanism of science and technology insurance on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Promoting the synergistic development of industry and finance is an important focus point to promote the high-quality development of economy, and it is worth exploring how science and technology insurance, as an important science and technology financial tool, affects the enhancement of the total factor productivity of enterprises. Based on the panel data of listed high-tech enterprises from 2012 to 2023, we empirically studied the effect and mechanism of science and technology insurance on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises. The study found that science and technology insurance can significantly promote the total factor productivity of enterprises. The heterogeneity analysis showed that science and technology insurance has a more obvious effect on the total factor productivity of enterprises with higher total factor productivity level, more competitive industries, non-state-owned enterprises and enterprises in the eastern region. In terms of the specific mechanism of action, science and technology insurance contributes to the total factor productivity of enterprises by alleviating financing constraints, strengthening competitiveness, and promoting utilization of redundant resources. At the same time, entrepreneurship, government subsidies, and enterprise performance play a positive and incremental marginal effect in the process of promoting the total factor productivity of enterprises. This paper has enriched the research on the mechanism of enterprise total factor productivity enhancement, and it will shed light on the focus on enterprise innovation, construction of multi-channel and multi-principal risk-sharing mechanism, and enhancement of total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises.

Key words

science and technology insurance / total factor productivity of enterprise / financing constraint / innovative development

Cite this article

Download Citations
Pan Guangxi , Guo Bing , Zhao Hulin. Research on the influencing mechanism of science and technology insurance on the total factor productivity of high-tech enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(5): 150-159 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.05.015

References

[1]
黄先海, 高亚兴. 数实产业技术融合与企业全要素生产率:基于中国企业专利信息的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(11):118-136.
HUANG Xianhai, GAO Yaxing. Technology convergence of digital and real economy industries and enterprise total factor productivity: Research based on Chinese enterprise patent information[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(11):118-136.
[2]
任辉. 高新技术企业科技保险购买意愿影响因素研究:基于广州市274家高新技术企业的调查[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(21):110-117.
Abstract
基于有限理性假说,构建高新技术企业科技保险购买意愿影响因素分析框架,运用Probit模型对广州市274家高新技术企业调查问卷数据进行回归分析。实证结果表明,管理者受教育程度、风险态度,企业类型、注册资金、信用,企业风险认知、对科技保险政策的了解程度、对保险保障水平的认知,以及行业竞争程度、政府支持本行业的满意度、是否参加行业协会等因素对企业科技保险购买意愿具有显著影响。此外,对当前高新技术企业科技保险参保率低的原因作出解释,为相关部门制定政策提供依据。政府应从增强企业风险识别和评估能力、提高保险保障水平、丰富保险产品品种和发挥保险融资功能等方面入手,进一步推动科技保险发展。
REN Hui. Research on the factors influencing the purchase willingness of high-tech enterprises technology insurance: Based on the survey of 274 high-tech enterprises in Guangzhou[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2020, 37(21):110-117.
[3]
罗琰, 谷政. 基于VaR的科技保险风险补偿问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(12):185-190.
Abstract
VaR(Value at Risk)是金融企业进行全面风险管理的有效工具,是保险公司“偿二代(C-ROSS)”量化资本要求采用的方法。本文利用VaR工具,在委托代理框架下,研究了科技保险风险补偿合同问题,阐述了科技保险风险补偿的理论依据。在对称信息与非对称信息情形下,获得了风险补偿合同的闭式解。本文结果显示,合同中固定补偿将起主导作用,最优边际补偿系数可正可负,且随保险公司置信水平增加而递减。
LUO Yan, GU Zheng. Research on the risk compensation of science and technology insurance based on VaR[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(12):185-190.
VaR is an effective tool for financial enterprises to carry out comprehensive risk management, and the insurance company method of C-ROSS quantifying capital. Under the principal-agent framework, this paper studies a risk compensation contract of science and technology insurance using the VaR tool, expounds the theoretical basis of science and technology insurance risk compensation, and obtains the explicit solutions of the risk compensation contract under the cases of symmetry and asymmetry information respectively. The results indicate that fixed compensation in the contract plays a leading role, and the optimal marginal incentive coefficients could be positive or negative, decreasing with the confidence level of insurance company.
[4]
杜宝贵, 廉玉金. 科技金融驱动创新能力提升的组态路径研究:基于中国内陆30个省域的FsQCA分析[J]. 科学管理研究, 2023(2):135-142.
DU Baogui, LIAN Yujin. Research on the configuration path of promoting innovation ability driven by science and technology finance: Based on the FsQCA analysis of 30 inland provinces in China[J]. Scientific Management Research, 2023(2):135-142.
[5]
胡德龙, 石满珍. 数字经济对企业全要素生产率的影响研究[J]. 当代财经, 2023(12):17-29.
HU Delong, SHI Manzhen. A study of the impact of digital economy on corporate total factor productivity[J]. Contemporary Finance and Economics, 2023(12):17-29.
[6]
宋林, 王嘉丽, 李东倡. “两业”融合与先进制造业全要素生产率[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2024(2):77-90.
SONG Lin, WANG Jiali, LI Dongchang. “Two Industries” convergence and total factor productivity of advanced manufacturing[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Social Sciences), 2024(2):77-90.
[7]
张万里, 宣旸, 张澄, 等. 智能化能否提升企业全要素生产率和技术创新[J]. 科研管理, 2022(12):107-116.
ZHANG Wanli, XUAN Yang, ZHANG Cheng, et al. Can intelligent technology improve the total factor productivity and technological innovation of enterprises?[J]. Science Research Management, 2022(12):107-116.
[8]
周冬华, 彭剑飞. 首台套重大技术装备保险与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(9):80-90.
ZHOU Donghua, PENG Jianfei. The first set of major technical equipment insurance and innovation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(9):80-90.
[9]
龙小宁, 林菡馨. 专利执行保险的创新激励效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(3):116-135.
LONG Xiaoning, LIN Hanxin. Effects of patent enforcement insurance on innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(3):116-135.
[10]
WANG Zhengwen, YIN Hongli, FAN Fei, et al. Science and technology insurance and regional innovation: Evidence from provincial panel data in China[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2024, 36(4):746-764.
[11]
陈诗一, 吴绪成, 王川杰. 税收优惠、人力资本结构调整与高新技术企业创新[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2023(5):1-16.
CHEN Shiyi, WU Xucheng, WANG Chuanjie. Tax incentives, human capital structure adjustment, and innovation in high-tech enterprises[J]. World Economic Papers, 2023(5):1-16.
[12]
夏清华, 黄剑. 市场竞争、政府资源配置方式与企业创新投入:中国高新技术企业的证据[J]. 经济管理, 2019(8):5-20.
XIA Qinghua, HUANG Jian. The influence of government resource allocation on the relationship between market competition and corporate innovation investment: Evidence of high-tech enterprises in China[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2019(8):5-20.
[13]
郑明贵, 董娟, 钟昌标. 资本深化对中国资源型企业全要素生产率的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(3):536-553.
Abstract
提升全要素生产率是高质量发展阶段资源型企业转型的重要途径。本文基于2010—2019年中国资源型上市企业财务数据,采用LP法测算其各年份全要素生产率水平及变化趋势,构建了固定效应模型和动态面板模型,从要素投入结构视角检验资本深化对资源型企业全要素生产率的影响及其传导机制。研究发现:①资源型企业全要素生产率逐年增长,但增长率偏低且整体呈下降态势,表明资源型企业发展缓慢,面对新发展、新阶段的竞争力不足;②资源型企业资本深化水平不断提升,深化速度明显加快,对企业全要素生产率增长具有显著的抑制效应,异质性分析表明这种抑制效应在上游开采业、能源企业、快速资本深化时期、经济发展水平较低地区和国有资源型企业中更为突出;③影响机制检验表明,产能过剩效应是资本深化抑制资源型企业全要素生产率的主要传导机制,同时由于创新投入对资源型企业全要素生产率增长的贡献较低,创新惰性效应虽存在但传导作用有限;④进一步研究发现,资本深化对组织资本较高和融资约束较低的资源型企业全要素生产率的抑制作用更小。本文研究结论对资源型企业要素配置决策和转型发展具有重要政策启示。
ZHENG Minggui, DONG Juan, ZHONG Changbiao. Influence mechanism of capital deepening on total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(3):536-553.

In the era of high-quality development, improving total factor productivity is an important way to transform resource-based enterprises. Based on the financial data of China's resource-based listed enterprises from 2010 to 2019, this study used Levinsohn-Petrin (LP) method to measure the level and trend of total factor productivity in each year, and constructed fixed effect and dynamic panel models to test the impact of capital deepening on total factor productivity of these resource-based enterprises and its mechanism from the perspective of factor input structure. The results show that: The total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises increased year by year, but the growth rate was low and the overall growth rate was declining, indicating that the development of resource-based enterprises was slow and there was a lack of competitiveness in the new development stage. The capital deepening level of resource-based enterprises was constantly improving, and the deepening speed was obviously accelerating, which had a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of total factor productivity of enterprises. The heterogeneity analysis shows that this inhibitory effect was more prominent in the upstream mining industry, energy industry, rapid capital deepening period, lower economic development areas, and state-owned resource-based enterprises. The impact mechanism test shows that the overcapacity effect was the main transmission mechanism of capital deepening inhibiting the total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises. Due to the low contribution of innovation investment to the total factor productivity growth of resource-based enterprises, the innovation inertia effect existed, but the transmission effect was limited. Resource-based enterprises with higher organizational capital and lower financing constraints had less inhibitory effect on total factor productivity. The conclusions of this study have important policy implications for the factor allocation decision and transformation development of resource-based enterprises.

[14]
周小刚, 陈水琳, 李丽清. 大数据能力、技术创新与人力资源服务企业竞争力关系研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(7):81-91.
ZHOU Xiaogang, CHEN Shuilin, LI Liqing. Research on the relationship among big data capacity, technological innovation and competitiveness of human resource service enterprises[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(7):81-91.
[15]
史青春, 牛悦, 徐慧. 企业数据要素利用水平影响投资效率机理研究:利用数据要素激活冗余资源的中介作用[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2023(11):105-115.
Abstract
 企业生产经营中通过提高数据要素利用水平提升投资效率的机制,有赖于利用数据要素激活冗余资源所发挥的中介作用以及企业自身吸收能力的调节作用。笔者基于资源基础理论、代理理论以及吸收能力理论,构建了一个有调节的企业数据要素利用水平影响投资效率机制的研究模型,以国泰安数据库(CSMAR)2011—2021年沪深A股上市公司相关有效数据,运用多元线性回归分析方法,实证检验了企业数据要素利用水平与其投资效率之间的关联及其变化状况。检验结果证实:企业数据要素利用水平与其投资效率正相关;企业利用数据要素激活冗余资源对企业利用数据要素提高其投资效率具有中介作用;企业自身吸收能力正向调节企业利用数据要素激活冗余资源之间的关系。本研究尝试性地将资源基础理论、代理理论和吸收能力理论拓展到实证检验企业数据要素利用水平与其投资效率之间的内在关系上,所揭示的关于企业数据要素利用水平影响投资效率机制之研究结论,将丰富有关数据要素、投资效率、冗余资源、企业吸收能力等方面的相关文献,有助于为企业利用数据要素提升投资效率提供理论依据。
SHI Qingchun, NIU Yue, XU Hui. Research on the mechanism of the impact of enterprise data element utilization level on investment efficiency: Using data elements to activate the intermediary role of redundant resources[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2023(11):105-115.
[16]
孙桂生, 唐少清, 陶金元, 等. 企业家精神、创新文化与高质量发展的内在逻辑分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(S1):454-461.
SUN Guisheng, TANG Shaoqing, TAO Jinyuan, et al. Internal logic analysis of entrepreneurship, innovation culture and high-quality development[J]. China Soft Science, 2024(S1):454-461.
[17]
郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(9):98-116.
GUO Yue. Signal transmission mechanism of government innovation subsidy and enterprise innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(9):98-116.
[18]
翟君, 郭婧, 郭伟. 专利质量对企业绩效的影响:盈利能力和技术创新类型的作用[J]. 工程管理科技前沿, 2023, 42(3):60-66.
ZHAI Jun, GUO Jing, GUO Wei. Research on the impact of patent quality on enterprise performance: The effect of profitability and technological innovation types[J]. Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management, 2023, 42(3):60-66.
[19]
鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012(2):541-558.
LU Xiaodong, LIAN Yujun. Estimation of total factor productivity of industrial enterprises in China:1999-2007[J]. China Economic Quarterly,2012(2):541-558.
[20]
PU Chengyi, MO Chou, LI Peihuan. Green insurance, technology insurance, and corporate green innovation[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Economics 2024, 2:1266745.
[21]
李亚青, 梁晓源, 王梓龙. 需求异质性视角下的科技保险财政补贴政策优化[J]. 保险研究, 2020(3):55-66.
LI Yaqing, LIANG Xiaoyuan, WANG Zilong. The optimization of fiscal subsidy policies for science and technology insurance from the perspective of the heterogeneity of demand[J]. Insurance Studies, 2020(3):55-66.
[22]
曾卓然, 韩仁杰, 任跃文. 企业管理效率、政府补贴与技术创新[J]. 统计与决策, 2021(2):181-184.
ZENG Zhuoran, HAN Renjie, REN Yuewen. Firm management efficiency, government subsidies and technological innovation[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2021(2):181-184.
[23]
李晓翔, 刘春林. 高流动性冗余资源还是低流动性冗余资源:一项关于组织冗余结构的经验研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(7):94-103.
LI Xiaoxiang, LIU Chunlin. High-discretion slack resources or low-discretion slack resources: An empirical study on the structure of organizational slack[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2010(7):94-103.
[24]
鞠晓生, 卢荻, 虞义华. 融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(1):4-16.
JU Xiaosheng, LU Di, YU Yihua. Financing constraints, working capital management and the persistence of firm innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(1):4-16.
[25]
江三良, 张晨. 企业家精神、产业政策与企业绩效:来自沪深A股制造业上市公司的证据[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2020, 17(4):40-49.
JIANG Sanliang, ZHANG Chen. Entrepreneurship, industrial policy and corporate performance: Evidence from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share manufacturing listed companies[J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2020, 17(4):40-49.
[26]
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
JIANG Ting. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(5):100-120.
[27]
周冬华, 罗晟哲, 赵玉洁. 董事高管责任保险与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2022(4):201-208.
ZHOU Donghua, LUO Shengzhe, ZHAO Yujie. Directors' and officers' liability insurance and enterprise innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2022(4):201-208.
[28]
陶锋, 王欣然, 徐扬, 等. 数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(5):118-136.
TAO Feng, WANG Xinran, XU Yang, et al. Digital transformation, resilience of industrial chain and supply chain, and enterprise productivity[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(5):118-136.
PDF(1129 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/