An analysis of the digital innovation incentive effect of chief information officers from the perspective of open innovation

Du Yang, Zhong Meirui, Xu Jun

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 95-103.

PDF(1173 KB)
PDF(1173 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 95-103. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.05.010  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.05.010

An analysis of the digital innovation incentive effect of chief information officers from the perspective of open innovation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Exploring the digital innovation incentive effect of Chief Information Officers (CIOs) from an open innovation perspective holds significant theoretical and practical implications for formulating innovation policies and achieving effective innovation management. Based on the three-dimensional representation of the information role effect, this study established a theoretical analytical framework for CIOs' digital innovation incentives within an open innovation context. Using the propensity score matching method to construct the enterprise-level panel data from 2015 to 2022, a multi-period difference-in-differences model was employed to test the incentive effects of CIOs on digital innovation. The results indicated that under the influence of the information role effect, the establishment of a CIO significantly and positively incentivizes corporate digital innovation, enhancing the output of digital patents. Public digital governance, characterized by improved e-government capabilities and public digital awareness, along with corporate digital governance centered on digital infrastructure, strengthens the information role effect and moderates the digital innovation incentive effect of CIOs. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the incentive effect is more pronounced in regions with established big data platforms and in enterprises categorized as high-tech industries. This study has expanded the theoretical research on corporate digital innovation from an information management perspective, enriched the understanding of the CIO's role, and uncovered critical antecedents influencing corporate digital innovation. It will provide valuable empirical evidence for the development of digital government initiatives and corporate digital transformation in China.

Key words

chief information officer (CIO) / information role / incentive / digital innovation / digital government / enterprise

Cite this article

Download Citations
Du Yang , Zhong Meirui , Xu Jun. An analysis of the digital innovation incentive effect of chief information officers from the perspective of open innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(5): 95-103 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.05.010

References

[1]
李律成, 曾媛杰, 彭华涛. 数字创新生态系统驱动新质生产力发展的组态路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(8):1-10.
LI Lucheng, ZENG Yuanjie, PENG Huatao. Research on the configuration path of digital innovation ecosystem driving the development of new quality productivity[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(8):1-10.
[2]
NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Digital innovation management[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
Rapid and pervasive digitization of innovation processes and outcomes has upended extant theories on innovation management by calling into question fundamental assumptions about the definitional boundaries for innovation, agency for innovation, and the relationship between innovation processes and outcomes. There is a critical need for novel theorizing on digital innovation management that does not rely on such assumptions and draws on the rich and rapidly emerging research on digital technologies. We offer suggestions for such theorizing in the form of four new theorizing logics, or elements, that are likely to be valuable in constructing more accurate explanations of innovation processes and outcomes in an increasingly digital world. These logics can open new avenues for researchers to contribute to this important area. Our suggestions in this paper, coupled with the six research notes included in the special issue on digital innovation management, seek to offer a broader foundation for reinventing innovation management research in a digital world.
[3]
康瑾, 陈凯华. 数字创新发展经济体系:框架、演化与增值效应[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4):1-10.
KANG Jin, CHEN Kaihua. Digital innovation development economic system: Framework, evolution and value-added effect[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(4):1-10.
[4]
史丹. 数字经济条件下产业发展趋势的演变[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11):26-42.
SHI Dan. Evolution of industrial development trend under the condition of digital economy[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(11):26-42.
[5]
刘海兵, 刘洋, 黄天蔚. 数字技术驱动高端颠覆性创新的过程机理:探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(7):63-81+99+82.
LIU Haibing, LIU Yang, HUANG Tianwei. The process mechanism of digital technology driving high-end disruptive innovation: An exploratory case study[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(7):63-81+99+82.
[6]
张延林, 邓福祥, 唐洪婷. CIO自身技能、需求方领导力与数字化创新[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(11):145-156.
ZHANG Yanlin, DENG Fuxiang, TANG Hongting. CIO's own skills, demand-side leadership and digital innovation[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(11):145-156.
[7]
STEPHENSON C, OLSON N. Why CIOs make great board directors[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2017, 15: 2-5.
[8]
LI J, LI M, WANG X, et al. Strategic directions for AI: The role of CIOs and boards of directors[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2021, 45(3):1603-1644.
[9]
JONES M C, KAPPELMAN L, PAVUR R, et al. Pathways to being CIO: The role of background revisited[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(5): 103234.
[10]
DE TUYA M, COOK M E, SUTHERLAND M, et al. The leading role of the government CIO at the local level: Strategic opportunities and challenges[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2020, 37(3): 101218.
[11]
REDDICK C G. Information resource managers and E-government effectiveness: A survey of Texas state agencies[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2006, 23(2): 249-266.
[12]
PEPPARD J. Unlocking the performance of the chief information officer (CIO)[J]. California Management Review, 2010, 52(4): 73-99.
[13]
URBACH N, AHLEMANN F, BÖHMANN T, et al. The impact of digitalization on the IT department[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2019, 61: 123-131.
[14]
SMITH T, TADESSE A F, VINCENT N E. The impact of CIO characteristics on data breaches[J]. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2021, 43: 100532.
[15]
AUGUSTSSON N P, NILSSON A, HOLMSTRÖM J, et al. Managing digital infrastructures: Negotiating control and drift in service provisioning[J]. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 2019, 30(1): 51-78.
[16]
陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5):68-91.
TAO Feng, ZHU Pan, QIU Chuzhi, et al. Research on the impact of digital technology innovation on firm market value[J]. Journal of Quantitative and Technological Economics, 2023, 40(5):68-91.
[17]
徐翔, 赵墨非, 李涛, 等. 数据要素与企业创新:基于研发竞争的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2):39-56.
XU Xiang, ZHAO Mofei, LI Tao, et al. Data factors and firm innovation: Based on the perspective of R&D competition[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(2):39-56.
[18]
TUMBAS S, BERENTE N, BROCKE J. Digital innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2018, 33(3): 188-202.
In this study, we explore the role of Chief Digital Officer (CDO) through the perspectives of CDOs in thirty-five organizations. In enacting their emerging role, CDOs must navigate the existing institutionalized context of established information technology (IT) roles and respective jurisdictional claims. We find that CDOs intentionally draw on the term “digital” to distance themselves from existing executive roles in order to gain legitimacy. CDOs as institutional entrepreneurs take a focal role in both: (1) articulating and developing the emerging “digital” logic of action and (2) enacting this digital logic through strategies such as grafting, bridging, and decoupling to navigate tensions between the existing and emerging approaches to innovation with digital technologies.
[19]
CHEN Y C, WU J H. IT management capability and its impact on the performance of a CIO[J]. Information & Management, 2011, 48(4-5): 145-156.
[20]
CHESBROUGH H. The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property[J]. California Management Review, 2003, 45(3): 33-58.
[21]
MALODIA S, DHIR A, MISHRA M, et al. Future of E-government: An integrated conceptual framework[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 173: 121102.
[22]
BENDIG D, WAGNER R, PIENING E P, et al. Attention to digital innovation: Exploring the impact of a chief information officer in the top management team[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2023, 47(4):1487-1516.
[23]
JANSSEN M, RANA N P, SLADE E L, et al. Trustworthiness of digital government services: Deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling[J]. Digital Government and Public Management, 2021: 15-39.
[24]
吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7):130-144+10.
WU Fei, HU Huizhi, LIN Huiyan, et al. Corporate digital transformation and capital market performance: Empirical evidence from stock liquidity[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(7):130-144+10.
[25]
BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667.
[26]
BAKER A C, LARCKER D F, WANG C C Y. How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, 144(2): 370-395.
[27]
GOODMAN-Bacon A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225(2): 254-277.
[28]
CAI X, LU Y, WU M, et al. Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 123: 73-85.
PDF(1173 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/