PDF(1561 KB)
Research on the key core technologies for "overtaking opponents by changing lanes" in China's automotive industry: The experiences and evidence from China's ICV industry
Liu Zhiying, Wei Yingxin
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4) : 12-22.
PDF(1561 KB)
PDF(1561 KB)
Research on the key core technologies for "overtaking opponents by changing lanes" in China's automotive industry: The experiences and evidence from China's ICV industry
Intelligent connected vehicles (ICV) represent a major trend in the development of the automotive industry, and its key core technologies determine the success or failure of the next round of corporate competition in this industry. The Chinese automotive industry attaches great importance to the development of ICVs. Whether it can "overtake opponents by changing lanes" depends not on production volume, but on cutting-edge technology. Identifying the key core technologies in this industry, clarifying the international competitions and country gaps in core technologies, can provide certain empirical evidence. This paper applied machine learning algorithms to fuse structured data (patents) and unstructured data (scientific papers, fund projects, etc.) from the feature level; combined the LDA models to identify key core technology themes in the ICV industry, and based on the emerging characteristics of industrial technology, used the patent network analysis to identify cutting-edge key core technology themes. Based on this, country distribution and country gaps are analyzed in this paper. The study found that: (1) There are seven key core technology themes in the ICV industry, among which four are cutting-edge key core technology themes: trajectory planning technology, traffic control system technology, intelligent decision-making technology, and information security technology; (2) Although the new track of the Chinese automotive industry is large in scale, except for a few breakthroughs in key core technologies in the ICV industry, there is still a significant gap in overall technology themes compared to countries such as the United States, Japan, and Europe. To achieve "overtaking opponents by changing lanes", the industry still faces arduous tasks. This conclusion will not only promote the understanding of the actual situation of technological innovation in the ICV industry, but also have important guiding value for enterprises in this industry to strengthen the research and development of key core technologies, as well as reference significance for the government to issue relevant policies.
technological innovation / key core technology / intelligent connected vehicle / automobile industry / international competition situation
| [1] |
中国信息通信研究院. 车联网白皮书[R/OL].(2023-12). http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202312/P020240326618179274556.pdf.
China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. White paper on connected vehicles[R/OL]. (2023-12) http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202312/P020240326618179274556.pdf.
|
| [2] |
刘志迎. 中国创新50人笔谈(2019)[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2020:225-231.
|
| [3] |
王会杰, 杨燕红, 李志强. 我国智能网联汽车发展现状及策略分析[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2023, 48(6):53-57.
随着科技的快速发展,智能网联汽车已成为汽车产业未来发展的趋势。目前,智能网联汽车朝智慧出行阶段加速推进、渗透率逐年提高,同时使交通效率提高、交通事故降低,大大改变了人们的生活方式。但也受到法律法规和道路测试管理的不完善以及数据不安全等问题的影响。基于此,文章首先剖析了智能网联汽车发展现状,其次分析了智能网联汽车发展所面临的问题。最后,针对目前智能网联汽车发展所存在的问题,提出了适应智能网联汽车有效发展的策略,从而有效解决了当下智能网联汽车发展所面临的难题,也为智能网联汽车发展提供了参考思路。
With the rapid development of science and technology, intelligent and connected vehicles have become the trend of the future development of the automobile industry. At present, intelligent networked vehicles are accelerating towards the stage of smart travel, and the penetration rate is increasing year by year, while improving traffic efficiency and reducing traffic accidents, which has greatly changed people's lifestyles. However, it is also affected by problems such as imperfect laws and regulations and road test management, as well as data insecurity. Based on this, this paper first analyzes the development status of intelligent connected vehicles, and then analyzes the problems faced by the development of intelligent connected vehicles. Finally, in view of the current problems in the development of intelligent and connected vehicles, the strategy of adapting to the effective development of intelligent connected vehicles is proposed, which effectively solves the problems faced by the development of intelligent and connected vehicles at present, and also provides a reference idea for the development of intelligent and connected vehicles.
|
| [4] |
李克强, 戴一凡, 李升波, 等. 智能网联汽车(ICV)技术的发展现状及趋势[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2017, 8(1):1-14.
|
| [5] |
赵光辉, 李翔宇, 陈凯. 我国智能网联汽车发展现状研究[J]. 时代汽车, 2019(17):153-154.
|
| [6] |
王小臣, 张美芳, 王星. 智能网联汽车管理政策研究[J]. 汽车工程师, 2021(11):1-4.
|
| [7] |
徐子淼. 智能网联汽车数据处理的法律规制:现实、挑战及进路[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 50(2):100-111.
|
| [8] |
赵志成. 我国智能网联汽车产业的发展困境与应对策略[J]. 品牌与标准化, 2021(5):98-100.
|
| [9] |
刘颖琦, 席锐, 周菲. 智能网联汽车产业技术创新优化路径研究:基于DEMATEL和系统动力学模型的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(9):37-46.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
田京润, 戚湧, 吕薇, 等. 基于专利大数据挖掘的智能网联汽车产业核心技术识别研究[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2023, 20(5):4-9+17.
|
| [12] |
王健美, 魏晨, 胥彦玲, 等. 专利视角下全球智能网联汽车技术竞争态势分析[J]. 汽车技术, 2021(8):20-29.
|
| [13] |
郑思佳, 汪雪锋, 刘玉琴, 等. 关键核心技术竞争态势评估研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(10):1-10.
|
| [14] |
陈劲, 阳镇, 朱子钦. “十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解:识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J]. 改革, 2020(12):5-15.
|
| [15] |
胡旭博, 原长弘. 关键核心技术:概念、特征与突破因素[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(1):4-11.
突破关键核心技术是“十四五”规划中科技自立自强的重要部署,是二〇三五年远景目标的重要规划,关系着我国能否如期进入创新型国家前列、建成世界科技强国。在该领域进行初步的理论探索,首先对关键核心技术进行概念界定与内涵阐释,进而描述关键核心技术的主要特征,最后以产学研为攻关主体,从“突破路径”和“助力渠道”两个维度探析出关键核心技术的7个主要突破因素:技术打压认知与需求导向、国际科技合作与开放创新、产学研深度融合、长期性充足研发资金投入、领军人才及其团队、技术链与产业链以及政府政策与体制机制等。结论可为后续研究与实践提供参考与借鉴。
Breaking through key part of core technology is a major practical problem and theoretical research topic in China. Proposals for formulating the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives Through the Year 2035 explicitly states that "Sci-tech self-reliance and self-strengthening as the strategic support for national development, the new system concentrating nationwide effort and resources on key national sci-tech undertakings should be improved in the context of the socialist market economy, and key part of core technology should be strived to make major breakthroughs".However, the academic research on breaking through key part of core technology is still in its infancy, and there are not many researches abroad. The limited literature and reports in China mainly focus on a few topics such as leadership speeches, government role, identification methods, innovation barriers, breakthrough paths, institutional mechanisms and case description. Scholars has made a preliminary study on the concept, characteristics and influencing factors of key part of core technology, but it is far from reaching a consensus. In view of this, we especially explores some basic theoretical issues in this field: concept, connotation, characteristics and breakthrough factors of key part of core technology. Firstly, key part of core technology can be understood from two perspectives: the concept of “or” relationship between “key technology” and “core technology”; “key” represents the degree of importance, “core technology” is the body. Comprehensively reviewing the concepts of key part of core technology in existing literature, we find that some define it through the first perspective and quote the concepts like “core technology” from previous studies, which enlarges or reduces the connotation and extension of key part of core technology and blurs the boundary characters between them; Others make definition from their own interest, but perspectives vary from one to another. Based on this, we believe that key part of core technology is a necessary and insufficient condition of core technology. Combining the related theories of technology gap, the view of sustainable development and holistic approach to national security, we define the concept and explain the connotation of key part of core technology. Then, from the perspective of process, the main characters of key part of core technology are described from four aspects: technical status, research process, breakthrough mechanism and innovation achievements. Finally, the contradiction between a dilemma that one country’s high-end sci-tech development being blocked by other developed countries and that country's domestic security and market demand has triggered a theoretical discussion on breaking through key part of core technology and realizing sci-tech self-reliance and self-strengthening. Taking Industry-University-Research as the body, we analyze seven main breakthrough factors of the key part of core technology from the two dimensions of "breakthrough path" and "assistance channel": Technology suppression cognition and demand orientation, International science technology cooperation and open innovation, Deep integration of Industry-University-Research, Long-term sufficient R&D investment, Leading talents and their teams, Technology chain and industry chain, Government policies and institutional mechanisms. The conclusion can provide a basis of reference for the further research and practice.
|
| [16] |
辜胜阻, 吴华君, 吴沁沁, 等. 创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J]. 中国软科学, 2018(10):9-18.
|
| [17] |
阳镇. 关键核心技术:多层次理解及其突破[J]. 创新科技, 2023, 23(1):14-24.
|
| [18] |
余维新, 熊文明. 关键核心技术军民融合协同创新机理及协同机制研究:基于创新链视角[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2020(12):34-39.
|
| [19] |
赵建, 梁爽. 关键核心技术识别方法研究进展[J]. 情报杂志, 2024, 43(4):68-77.
|
| [20] |
侯剑华, 范二宝. 基于专利家族的核心技术演进分析: 以太阳能光伏电池技术为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(12):30-35+40.
|
| [21] |
The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
王曰芬, 张露, 张洁逸. 产业领域核心专利识别与演化分析:以人工智能领域为例[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(12):19-26.
|
| [24] |
王桂芳, 何涛, 马廷灿, 等. 基于科技文献的生物核磁领域技术机会识别[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(10):142-147.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
任佳妮, 张薇, 杨阳, 等. “人工智能+医疗”新兴技术识别研究:以医疗机器人为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(12):45-50.
|
| [28] |
董坤, 郭锐, 田常伟, 等. 面向产业关键核心技术精准布局的情报支持框架研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(4):105-113.
|
| [29] |
李维思, 谭力铭, 章国亮, 等. 基于多源信息融合的产业链关键核心技术主题识别研究:以人工智能领域为例[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(1):116-126.
|
| [30] |
韩志华. 核心专利判别的综合指标体系研究[J]. 中国外资, 2010(2):193-196.
|
| [31] |
张娴, 方曙, 肖国华, 等. 专利文献价值评价模型构建及实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(6):127-132.
利用层次分析法定性与定量相结合的决策思想,对专利文献计量分析中专利文献价值评价进行了确定与量化。遴选设计评价指标,构建指标体系,确定指标权重,搭建评价模型,并以C市生物医药行业专利文献数据为样本进行了实证分析,希望为专利文献计量中核心专利文献的定位提供具有较强操作性的量化手段,进而为专利价值判断乃至技术评价提供方法支持。
|
| [32] |
经济合作与发展组织. 专利统计手册[M].高昌林等译. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社,2013:3.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Patent statistics manual[M].Translated by Gao Changlin,et al. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documents Publishing House,2013:3.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |