互补资产对平台企业协同创新的影响研究——基于网络编配能力中介作用的分析

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.09.012

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 117-125.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.09.012

互补资产对平台企业协同创新的影响研究——基于网络编配能力中介作用的分析

汪涛¹，赵西莹¹，贺凯屏¹，王新^1,2，王宇³

1.北京理工大学管理学院，北京100081；
2.清华大学经济管理学院，北京100084；
3.浙江大学公共管理学院，浙江杭州310030

收稿日期:2023-12-22 修回日期:2024-11-27 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-09-09
通讯作者: 赵西莹
基金资助:

Research on the influence of complementary assets on the synergistic innovation of platform enterprises: An analysis of the mediating roles of network orchestration capabilities

Wang Tao¹, Zhao Xiying¹, He Kaiping¹, Wang Xin^1,2, Wang Yu³

1. School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, China

Received:2023-12-22 Revised:2024-11-27 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-09-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 协同创新是平台企业创造价值的关键方式，同时平台企业的发展高度依赖外部资源，互补性资产对其开展协同创新十分重要。已有研究多聚焦平台企业借助市场手段实现垄断等问题，对于平台企业的资源特性、其协同创新的影响因素缺乏关注。本文引入网络编配理论，将前人研究拓展到平台企业这一赞助型编配者，识别其编配特征及编配能力维度，进而澄清互补性资产与其协同创新的关系，探讨网络编配能力（知识流动能力、创新独占能力和网络稳定能力）的中介作用。通过问卷调查获得一手数据，实证结果表明：互补性资产正向影响平台企业协同创新；互补性资产正向影响知识流动能力、创新独占能力和网络稳定能力；知识流动能力、创新独占能力和网络稳定能力分别在互补性资产与平台企业协同创新的关系中起部分中介作用。研究结果为平台企业创新提供了新的理论视角，丰富了平台企业创新的影响因素研究，推进了网络编配理论的研究进展，并为平台企业有效开展协同创新提供了理论依据和实践指导。

关键词: 平台企业, 网络编配理论, 互补性资产, 协同创新

Abstract: Synergistic innovation is a key way for platform enterprises to create value, and at the same time, the development of platform enterprises is highly dependent on external resources. Existing studies have focused on issues such as platform enterprises′ monopoly by means of market, but have paid little attention to their resource characteristics and the influencing factors of their synergistic innovation. This paper introduced the network orchestration theory, extended the previous research to the platform enterprise, which is the sponsored orchestration provider, identified its orchestration characteristics and orchestration capability dimensions, clarified the relationship between complementary assets and synergistic innovation, and discussed the mediating role of network orchestration capabilities (knowledge mobility, innovation appropriability and network stability). Through the questionnaire survey, the empirical results showed that (1) complementary assets positively affect the synergistic innovation of platform enterprises; (2) complementary assets positively affect knowledge mobility, innovation appropriability and network stability; and (3) knowledge mobility, innovation appropriability and network stability play a partial mediating role in the relationship between complementary assets and synergistic innovation of platform enterprises. The research results will provide a new theoretical perspective for platform enterprise innovation, enrich the research on the influencing factors of platform enterprise innovation, promote the research progress of network orchestration theory, and provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for platform enterprises to effectively carry out synergistic innovation.

Key words: platform firm, network orchestration theory, complementary assets, synergistic innovation

汪涛, 赵西莹, 贺凯屏, 王新, 王宇. 互补资产对平台企业协同创新的影响研究——基于网络编配能力中介作用的分析[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(9): 117-125.

Wang Tao, Zhao Xiying, He Kaiping, Wang Xin, Wang Yu. Research on the influence of complementary assets on the synergistic innovation of platform enterprises: An analysis of the mediating roles of network orchestration capabilities[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(9): 117-125.

参考文献

[1]WEYL E G.A Price Theory of Multi-Sided Platforms[J].American Economic Review, 2010, 100(4):1642-72
[2]RIETVELD J, SCHILLING M A.Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature[J].Journal of Management, 2021, 27(6):1528-63
[3]ZENG J, MAHDI TAVALAEI M, KHAN Z.Sharing economy platform firms and their resource orchestration approaches[J].Journal of Business Research, 2021, 136(451-65):-
[4]ZENG J A G, KEITH W.Competitive Dynamics between Multinational Enterprises and Local Internet Platform Companies in the Virtual Market in China [J]. British Journal of Management, 2015, 27: 479-96.
[5]张镒, 刘人怀.互补性资产、平台领导力对双元创新的影响——基于环境复杂性的调节作用[J].管理评论, 2020, 32(10):158-69
[6]万文海, 刘龙均.员工与用户内外协同对平台企业创新绩效的影响：基于价值共创视角[J].南开管理评论, 2021, 24(02):72-84
[7]LIU Z, HUANG Y, HUANG Y, et al.How does one-sided versus two-sided customer orientation affect B2B platform’s innovation: Differential effects with top management team status [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 141: 619-32.
[8]LI F.Sustainable Competitive Advantages via Temporary Advantages: Insights from the Competition between American and Chinese Digital Platforms in China[J].British Journal of Management, 2021, 33(4):2009-32
[9]WANG C, HU Q.Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance [J]. Technovation, 2020, 94-95.
[10]TEECE D J.Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy [J]. Research Policy, 1986, 15(6).
[11]彭新敏, 吴晓波, 吴东.核心技术、互补资产与后发企业的超越追赶[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(07):135-43
[12]CHRISTMANN P.Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(4):663-80
[13]NDUBISI N O, DAYAN M, YENIARAS V, et al.The effects of complementarity of knowledge and capabilities on joint innovation capabilities and service innovation: The role of competitive intensity and demand uncertainty [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 89: 196-208.
[14]CENAMOR J.Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 122: 335-43.
[15]周冬梅, 朱璇玮, 陈雪琳, et al.数字平台生态系统：概念基础、研究现状与未来展望 [J]. 科学学研究, 2023: 1-17.
[16]邵鹏, 胡平.电子商务平台商业模式创新与演变的案例研究[J].科研管理, 2016, 37(07):81-8
[17]DHANARAJ C, PARKHE A.Orchestrating innovation networks [J]. Acad Manage Rev, 2006, 31.
[18]HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN P, OLANDER H, BLOMQVIST K, et al.Orchestrating R&D networks: Absorptive capacity,network stability,and innovation appropriability[J].Eur Manag J, 2012, 30(6):552-63
[19]HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN P, N?TTI S.Orchestrator types, roles and capabilities – A framework for innovation networks [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, 74: 65-78.
[20]熊爱华, 侯德恩.组态视角下平台企业商业模式创新路径研究[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(12):89-97
[21]HELFAT C E, RAUBITSCHEK R S.Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems[J].Research Policy, 2018, 47(8):1391-9
[22]BLOMQVIST K, LEVY J.Collaboration capability a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks [J]. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2006, 2(1).
[23]FIEDLER M, WELPE I M.Antecedents of cooperative commercialisation strategies of nanotechnology firms[J].Research Policy, 2010, 39(3):400-10
[24]ZHANG Y, LI J, TONG T W.Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2020, 43(3):599-626
[25]TUSHMAN M L, NADLER D A.Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design[J].The Academy of Management Review, 1978, 3(3):613-24
[26]KIM K, ALTMANN J.Platform Provider Roles in Innovation in Software Service Ecosystems[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022, 69(4):930-9
[27]GE J, LI T.Entrepreneurial Resources, Complementary Assets, and Platform Sustainability [J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(16).
[28]朱明洋, 吴晓波.平台网络的行动空间对商业模式创新影响研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2023: 1-15.
[29]SKIPPARI M, LAUKKANEN M, SALO J.Cognitive barriers to collaborative innovation generation in supply chain relationships [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2017, 62: 108-17.
[30]CHESBROUGH H W, APPLEYARD M M.Open innovation and strategy[J].California management review, 2007, 50(1):57-76
[31]SOOSAY C A, HYLAND P W, FERRER M.Supply chain collaboration: capabilities for continuous innovation[J].Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2008, 13(2):160-9
[32]YANG M, WANG J, ZHANG X.Boundary-spanning search and sustainable competitive advantage: The mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovations [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 127: 290-9.
[33]FORNELL C, LARCKER D F.Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J].Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1):39-50
[34]LI G, XUE J, LI N, et al.Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 163.

互补资产对平台企业协同创新的影响研究——基于网络编配能力中介作用的分析

Research on the influence of complementary assets on the synergistic innovation of platform enterprises: An analysis of the mediating roles of network orchestration capabilities

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	白景坤, 周涵. 平台生态治理和互补市场进入对互补企业创新影响[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(7): 101-110.
[2]	腾达, 武靖州, 苏显方. 科技人员流动、研发补贴对协同创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2025, 46(4): 157-168.
[3]	易加斌, 俞澜天, 王宇婷, 杨小平. 制造业企业网络联结强度、协同创新能力与数字化转型[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(8): 154-163.
[4]	周全, 程梦婷, 吴绍波, 曾莉. 新能源汽车企业创新生态系统协同构建研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 32-41.
[5]	郭韬, 罗成飞, 张洪宇. 基于多主体博弈的区域军民科技协同创新生态系统演化研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 83-92.
[6]	闫宽夏恩君李德煌. 互补企业平台生态能力对协同创新的影响路径与作用机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(11): 130-140.
[7]	曹霞, 张鑫. 社会资本对战略性新兴产业协同创新网络的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(10): 34-44.
[8]	徐晓丹柳卸林黄斌王倩. 用户驱动的重大工程创新生态系统的建构[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 32-40.
[9]	石风光周明许彬. 中国工业绿色化协同创新生产的动态空间计量[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 60-72.
[10]	王海花孙芹杜梅周洁. 长三角城市群协同创新网络对协同创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 19-32.
[11]	苏屹曹铮. 京津冀区域协同创新网络演化及影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3): 43-55.
[12]	王海花杜梅刘钊成. 高校知识网络对产学协同创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(2): 116-126.
[13]	孟凡生马茹浩. 离散制造智能化关键技术协同创新及影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(1): 37-47.
[14]	金银. 面向共享与协同的设计产业知识产权管理模式[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 169-175.
[15]	雷怀英张文杰贾晓磊. 知识创新视角下政产学协同创新测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(8): 81-89.