科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 133-141.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.05.014

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识产权国际保护对企业创新绩效的影响研究

吴翟1,覃楚翔2,蒋殿春1,3   

  1. 1.南开大学经济学院，天津300071；
    2.中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心，湖北 武汉430073；
    3.南开大学经济行为与政策模拟实验室，天津300071

  • 收稿日期:2024-09-24 修回日期:2025-03-24 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 蒋殿春
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目：“数字型跨国公司的理论和政策研究”（22JJD790039，2023—2025）；教育部哲学社科实验室专项基金项目：“中美科技博弈及中国高科技产业技术发展”（H0122706，2023—2025）；国家社会科学基金青年项目：“人工智能数据训练的著作权规则研究”（24CFX084，2024—2027）。

Research on the impact of cross-border intellectual property rights protection on firms′ innovation performance

Wu Di1, Qin Chuxiang2, Jiang Dianchun1,3   

  1. 1. School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
    2. Center for Studies of Intellectual Property Rights, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China;
    3. Laboratory for Economic Behaviors and Policy Simulation, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • Received:2024-09-24 Revised:2025-03-24 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-12

摘要：     加强知识产权国际保护，营造知识产权负责任大国形象是否有助于企业创新的争议由来已久。知识产权保护能否通过“技术引进”效应以推动企业创新有待进行实证检验。本文着眼于2004年前后中国修订《对外贸易法》等与知识产权国际保护相关法律规范的准自然实验，基于2000—2013年中国工业企业数据与海关数据的合并数据，实证检验了知识产权国际保护对于企业创新绩效的影响。实证结果显示：（1）知识产权国际保护存在“技术引进”效应，一方面有助于吸引外商直接投资，另一方面能够推动企业扩大资本品进口的数量与种类，从而有助于企业提升创新绩效。（2）知识产权国际保护对企业创新绩效存在异质性影响效应，主要体现在外资企业、非五口通商城市企业与混合贸易企业上。（3）知识产权国际保护所引致的创新，最终能够被“消化吸收”形成新产品，实现技术赶超，转化为看得见的“生产力”。本研究从国际贸易的视角实证考察了知识产权国际保护的创新激励效应，研究结论为通过知识产权领域的制度型开放吸引全球创新要素，破解“技术断供”威胁提供了重要的政策启示。

关键词: 知识产权国际保护, 企业创新, 资本品进口, 外商直接投资, 技术引进

Abstract:    There has been a long debate regarding whether enhancing cross-border intellectual property rights protection (CIPRP) and cultivating a responsible national image can foster innovation, which remains to be empirically verified. Based on the quasi-natural experiment that China revised legal items related to CIPRP in 2004, this paper used China′s industrial enterprise data and customs data and empirically examined the influence of CIPRP on enterprise innovation performance. The empirical findings indicated that (1) CIPRP attracts foreign direct investment, and encourages enterprises to expand both the quantity and variety of capital goods imports, thereby aiding firms in enhancing their innovation performance. (2) The heterogeneous impact of CIPRP on firms′ innovation performance is primarily reflected in foreign firms, firms located outside the "five trade ports", and mixed trade firms. (3) This innovation can eventually be absorbed and achieve technological catch-up. This paper also empirically examined the effect of CIPRP on firms′ innovation performance from the perspective of international trade. The results will offer important policy implications for leveraging institutional openness in the domain of intellectual property rights to draw in global innovation factors, and relieving the threat of "technology blockade".

Key words: cross-border intellectual property rights protection, firms′ innovation, import of capital goods, foreign direct investment, technology import