PDF(1120 KB)
PDF(1120 KB)
PDF(1120 KB)
混合所有制改革对民营企业高层次人才配置的影响研究
Research on the influence of mixed ownership reform on the staffing of high-level talents in private enterprises
人才是激发经济创新活力的关键生产要素,民营企业能否通过混合所有制改革提升人才吸引力,是促进民营经济发展壮大过程中需要回答的关键问题。本文选取2008—2019年民营上市公司为研究样本,使用OLS模型、中介效应模型,实证检验了混合所有制改革对民营企业高层次人才配置的提升作用与影响路径。研究发现:参与混改的国有股东为央企或其距离政府的金字塔控制链较短时,这种提升作用更加显著。提升路径为降低民营企业冗员、提高薪酬激励水平与加快企业发展进程。截面分析发现,国有股东参股主要优化了无国企历史背景、企业历史较短的民营企业高层次人才配置,并促进了欠发达地区以及非资本性资源依赖型民营企业高层次人才的引进。最后,国有股东参股通过促进高层次人才配置强化了民营企业创新产出。研究结果证明了国有股东参股对民营企业具有人力资源支持效应,优化高层次人才配置是解释民营企业混改创新效应的重要理论路径,为实现民营经济获取人才竞争中性的发展环境并实现高质量发展提供了改革参考。
The talent is a key factor of production to stimulate economic innovation. Whether private enterprises can increase talent attraction through mixed ownership reform is a key issue that needs to be answered in the process of promoting the development and expansion of private economy. This study selected the private listed companies from 2008 to 2019 as research samples, used the OLS model and mediating effect model to empirically test the promotion effect and influence path of mixed ownership reform on the staffing of high-level talents in private enterprises. The results showed that when the state-owned shareholders involved in mixed ownership reform are central enterprises or they are shorter from the pyramid control chain of the government, the promotion effect is more significant. The path of the promotion effect is to reduce redundancy in private enterprises, improve salary incentive levels, and accelerate the development of enterprises. Cross-sectional analysis found that state-owned shareholders mainly optimized the staffing of high-level talent in private enterprises without a history of state-owned enterprises or with a short history of enterprises, and promoted the introduction of high-level talent in underdeveloped areas and non-capital resource-dependent private enterprises. Finally, state-owned shareholders strengthened the innovation output of private enterprises by promoting the staffing of high-level talents. The research results proved that state-owned shareholders have human resource support effect on private enterprises, and optimizing the staffing of high-level talents is an important theoretical path to explain the innovation effect of mixed ownership reform in private enterprises. It will provide a reform reference for achieving a competitive development environment for private enterprises to obtain talents and achieve high-quality development.
mixed ownership / private enterprise / high-level talent / enterprise innovation
| [1] |
赵全军. “为人才而竞争”:理解地方政府行为的一个新视角[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(4):40-45.
|
| [2] |
李静, 楠玉, 刘霞辉. 中国经济稳增长难题:人力资本错配及其解决途径[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(3):18-31.
|
| [3] |
申广军, 姚洋, 钟宁桦. 民营企业融资难与我国劳动力市场的结构性问题[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2):41-58.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
马新啸, 汤泰劼, 郑国坚. 国有企业混合所有制改革与人力资本结构调整:基于高层次人才配置的视角[J]. 财贸经济, 2020, 41(12):101-116.
|
| [6] |
陈建林. 家族控制、非控股国有股权与民营企业债务融资[J]. 经济科学, 2015(4):95-106.
|
| [7] |
郝阳, 龚六堂. 国有、民营混合参股与公司绩效改进[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(3):122-135.
|
| [8] |
李华民, 兰雅婷, 向海凌. 国有资本参股能否赋能民营企业高质量发展?[J]. 南开经济研究, 2023(12):199-217.
|
| [9] |
步丹璐, 刘静. 政策性负担与民营企业行为:基于三一重工变更注册地的案例研究[J]. 财经研究, 2017, 43(5):65-75.
|
| [10] |
姚梅洁, 宋增基, 张宗益. 制度负外部性与市场主体的应对:来自中国民营企业的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(11):158-173.
|
| [11] |
张望军, 彭剑锋. 中国企业知识型员工激励机制实证分析[J]. 科研管理, 2001(6):90-96.
|
| [12] |
李青原, 吴立扬, 蔡贵龙. 非控股国有股权与民营企业权益资本成本[J]. 证券市场导报, 2023(5):3-15.
|
| [13] |
罗宏, 秦际栋. 国有股权参股对家族企业创新投入的影响[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(7):174-192.
|
| [14] |
邵建平, 闫娇, 任华亮. 薪酬分配外部公平性对高学历员工的影响研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2008(2):78-80.
|
| [15] |
李志, 张华. 民营企业高学历员工需要特征与激励研究[J]. 科研管理, 2005(6):70-74.
|
| [16] |
辛清泉, 郑国坚, 杨德明. 企业集团、政府控制与投资效率[J]. 金融研究, 2007(10):123-142.
|
| [17] |
孙亮, 刘春. 民营企业因何引入国有股东?:来自向下调整盈余的证据[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(8):109-122.
|
| [18] |
曹春方, 许楠, 逯东, 等. 金字塔层级、长期贷款配置与长期贷款使用效率:基于地方国有上市公司的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(2):115-125.
|
| [19] |
李平, 崔喜君, 刘建. 中国自主创新中研发资本投入产出绩效分析:兼论人力资本和知识产权保护的影响[J]. 中国社会科学, 2007(2):32-42+204-205.
|
| [20] |
钱晓烨, 迟巍, 黎波. 人力资本对我国区域创新及经济增长的影响:基于空间计量的实证研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2010, 27(4):107-121.
|
| [21] |
韦浪, 赵劲松. 非控股国有股权对民营企业创新水平的影响研究[J]. 财政研究, 2021(10):114-129.
|
| [22] |
杨薇, 孔东民. 企业内部薪酬差距与人力资本结构调整[J]. 金融研究, 2019(6):150-168.
|
| [23] |
于瑶, 祁怀锦, 李若琳. 国有股东参股与民营企业审计定价[J]. 审计研究, 2022(6):105-116.
|
| [24] |
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5):731-745.
在心理学和其他社科研究领域, 大量实证文章建立中介效应模型, 以分析自变量对因变量的影响过程和作用机制。检验中介效应最流行的方法是Baron和Kenny的逐步法, 但近年来不断受到批评和质疑, 有人甚至呼吁停止使用其中的依次检验, 改用目前普遍认为比较好的Bootstrap法直接检验系数乘积。本文对相关的议题做了辨析, 并讨论了中介分析中建立因果关系的方法。综合新近的研究成果, 总结出一个中介效应分析流程, 并分别给出显变量和潜变量Mplus程序。最后介绍了中介效应模型的发展。
<p>Mediation models are frequently used in the research of psychology and other social science disciplines. Mediation indicates that the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable is transmitted through a third variable, which is called mediator. In most applied research, Baron and Kenny’s (1986) causal steps approach has been used to test mediating effect. In recent years, however, many methodological researchers questioned the rationality of the causal steps approach, and some of them even attempted to stop its use. Firstly, we clarify the queries on the causal steps approach one by one. Secondly, we propose a new procedure to analyze mediating effects. The new procedure is better than any single method that constitutes the procedure in terms of Type I error rate and power. The proposed procedure can be conducted by using observed variables and/or latent variables. Mplus programs are supplied for the procedure with observed variables and/or latent variables. Finally, this article introduces the development of mediation models, such as mediation model of ordinal variables, multilevel mediation, multiple mediation, moderated mediation, and mediated moderation.</p>
|
| [25] |
耿云江, 马影. 非国有大股东对国企超额雇员的影响:成本效应还是激励效应[J]. 会计研究, 2020(2):154-165.
|
| [26] |
This paper shows that organizations in market settings face complex institutional contexts to which they respond in different though patterned ways. We show how both regional state logics and family logics impact on organizational responses to an overarching market logic. Regional logics are particularly potent when the activities of firms, especially of large firms, are concentrated in regions whose governments champion regional distinctiveness and where the regional activities of the firm are significant. Family logics affect the decision to downsize, especially in smaller firms. This paper advances institutional theory by showing the influences of nonmarket institutions on market behavior, contributes to the growing recognition of community influences, and highlights the importance of historical context.
|
| [27] |
鲁桐, 党印. 公司治理与技术创新:分行业比较[J]. 经济研究, 2014, 49(6):115-128.
|
| [28] |
权小锋, 刘佳伟, 孙雅倩. 设立企业博士后工作站促进技术创新吗:基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(9):175-192.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
