The study on the major industry selection for the ecological agricultural county

Science Research Management ›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 172-178 .

Previous Articles Next Articles

The study on the major industry selection for the ecological agricultural county

Chen Senfa, Liang Xuechun, Wang Hongxia

School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received:2006-10-08 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-01-20 Published:2008-01-20

Abstract

Abstract: In order to realize the sustainable development of economy, society, and environment, the optimization of industry structure is the important aspect, and the choice of major industry is the key link. First, the selected indices for ecological agricultural county are determined. Second, the structure of index system and the weights of both criterion and indices are determined by means of principal component analysis. Then, the rank of its major industry capacity is got. Finally, its major industries are chosen. The actual examples show that the important references for major industry selection, development mode and growth way of ecological agricultural county can all be offered using the method proposed in here. . 8 Refs In Chinese

Key words:

ecological agricultural county, major industry, index system, principal component analysis

Chen Senfa, Liang Xuechun, Wang Hongxia. The study on the major industry selection for the ecological agricultural county[J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(1): 172-178 .

[1]	Li Kang, Fan Yuejin. An evaluation of the scientific research efficiency of first-class universities under the goal of construction of "double first-class university" [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(9): 41-47.
[2]	Zhu Mengfei, Chen Shouming, Shao Yuexin. An evaluation of creational and original innovation capacity of regions based on AHP-TOPSIS and SOM cluster analysis methods [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(2): 40-50.
[3]	Zhao Yanfei, Li Yuchen, Chen Kaihua. Research on the evaluation index system of national innovation environment: A perspective of innovation system [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(11): 66-74.
[4]	Meng Bin, Niu Erxuan, Kuang Haibo, Luo Jiaqi. An evaluation model and empirical research on CSR based on cloud model [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(7): 139-150.
[5]	Kuang Haibo, Yu Fangping, Tan Zhijia, Meng Qiang, Zhao Guangtian. The non-equilibrium evaluation model and empirical research of port supply-demand matching [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(4): 113-123.
[6]	Luo Lihua, Hu Xianjie, Feng Jun. An empirical comparison of evaluation index system of enterprise innovation efficiency [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(2): 60-65.
[7]	Meng Bin, Kuang Haibo, Luo Jiaqi . Socio-economic development evaluation indicators screening model and its application based on significant differences [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(11): 17-26.
[8]	Guo Lingling, Lu Xiaoli, Wu Chunyou, Qu Ying. Influencing Factors Research of Green Growth Based on Correlation Analysis and Rough Set [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(6): 141-150.
[9]	Wei Jiang, HuangXue. The innovation capability evaluation index system for high-tech services [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(12): 9-18.
[10]	Zhao Guangtian, Wang Keyi, Yu Fangping. A research on construction of the port supply and demand matching index system [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(12): 92-102.
[11]	Huang Huiling. An empirical study of the quantification of subsidy quota for science and technology planning projects [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(12): 146-154.
[12]	Song Yinghua, Li Xuyan, Wang Zhe, Wang Li. The combination of professional evaluation and Participation Satisfaction of earthquake emergency comprehensive exercise evaluation method [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 170-175.
[13]	Chi Guotai, Li Zhanjiang. Model of information contribution of evaluation index system based on principal component- entropy [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(12): 137-144.
[14]	Gao Yi, Qi Wei, Yi Yong. The performance evaluation index system of housing security of China’s local government—Based on a two-dimensional perspective of objective and benchmarking [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (6): 154-160.
[15]	Lu Jianfang, Dai Binxing. Efficiency evaluation of technology innovation resource allocationfor the technical centers in enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(1): 19-26.

The study on the major industry selection for the ecological agricultural county

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics