Network analysis on the science collaboration status quo of the nanotechnology

Science Research Management ›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 130-137 .

Previous Articles Next Articles

Network analysis on the science collaboration status quo of the nanotechnology

Xie Caixia

Institute of STS, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China;
WISELAB, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2007-02-05 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-01-20 Published:2008-01-20

Abstract

Abstract: Using SCI as the data source, the international articles on the nanotechnology from the database of SCI are searched. Based on pajek software technology, the science collaboration network of the world nanotechnology in 15 years from 1990 to 2004 is analyzed. The network characters from three facets: scientist, country, and subject are specially explored. The relative characters of science collaboration cluster and result production are shown. . 9 Refs In Chinese

Key words: nanotechnology, science collaboration, status quo of research, network analysis

Xie Caixia. Network analysis on the science collaboration status quo of the nanotechnology[J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(1): 130-137 .

[1]	Yu Rongjian, Zhao Yizhi, Xiang Liyao. International dependence network structure of chip technology and its evolution [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(5): 70-84.
[2]	Gu Xiaomei, Fan Decheng. Research on spatial correlation of industrial innovation and its influencing factors in China: An analysis based on the relationship of inter-regional industrial supply and demand [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(4): 29-38.
[3]	Cao Xing, Zhu Jingying, Yang Chunbaixue. The mechanism of "liquification" of emerging technology innovative network and its empirical analysis [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(2): 55-64.
[4]	Zeng Deming, Yu Yingjie, Wang Honglüe. A comparative study of the interdisciplinary characteristics of international papers among China, the USA and Japan [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(10): 33-41.
[5]	Zhou Yingnan, Huang Sai, Song Xiaoman. A research on evolution of the executive subject coordination networks of the green growth policy in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(8): 82-91.
[6]	Ma Rongkang, Wang Yitang. Identification of breakthrough inventions based on patent-to-patent similarity: A case study of nanotechnology [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(5): 153-160.
[7]	Cai Lin, Ren Jinluan. An analysis of cluster evolution of intelligent media technology and international competition situation [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(12): 100-107.
[8]	Li Yongkui, Chang Cheng, Li Biao. Diversified spatio-temporal evolution of innovative collaboration meta-networks in megaprojects [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(10): 98-104.
[9]	Chen Xin. A comparative study of the S&T collaboration networks in countries along the Belt and Road [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(7): 22-32.
[10]	Chen Wenjie, Zeng Deming. Multidimensional proximity evolution in the low-carbon technology collaborative innovation network [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(3): 30-40.
[11]	Zhang Suqi, Gao Xing, Guo Jingjin, Shi Qianqian, Gu Junhua. A research on the collaboration network of scientific project [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(5): 86-93.
[12]	Su Yi Han Minrui, Lei Jiasu. An analysis of regional innovation correlation network in China based on social network analysis [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(12): 78-85.
[13]	Yang Guancan, Liu Tong, Chen Liang, Zhang Jing. Determinants of patent citation formation based on the ERG model [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(11): 122-131.
[14]	Wang Cong, Zhou Liqun, Zhu Xianqi, Liu Hui. A research on the regional collaborative innovation network based on the effect of talent aggregation [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(11): 27-37.
[15]	Chen Wenjie1， Zeng Deming2， Zou Siming1. Collaborative Innovation Network Evolutionary path of Low-Carbon Vehicle Technology [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(8): 28-36.

Network analysis on the science collaboration status quo of the nanotechnology

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics