Relationships between stakeholders and enterprise technology innovation performance:Empirical analysis on stakeholders with high degree balance

Science Research Management ›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 30-35 .

Previous Articles Next Articles

Relationships between stakeholders and enterprise technology innovation performance:Empirical analysis on stakeholders with high degree balance

Sheng Ya, Shan Hangying

Research Center of Technology and Service Management, Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310035, China

Received:2008-02-15 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-11-30 Published:2008-11-30

Abstract

Abstract: Abstract: Enterprises pay more and more attention to the technology innovation. How to increase technological innovation performance meanwhile adding investment is a major task for enterprises, and it is also concerned by academic. According to power and stakes, stakeholders are classified into three kinds which are high degree balance stakeholders, intermediate degree balance stakeholders and low degree balance-stakeholders. And an empirical analysis was employed to examine the correlations between high degree balance stakeholders in power and stakes and technology innovation performance.

Key words: stakeholder, technology innovation performance, power, interest, multi-regression

CLC Number:

F270

Sheng Ya, Shan Hangying. Relationships between stakeholders and enterprise technology innovation performance:Empirical analysis on stakeholders with high degree balance[J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(6): 30-35 .

[1]	Chen Ling, Wang Xiaofei, Guan Ting, Xue Bing. Digital transformation path of enterprises: A transition from internal transformation to external empowerment [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 11-20.
[2]	Jia Yibo, Su Jingqin. Research on the governance role of hidden champions under global value chains: A case study based on the perspective of knowledge power [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(3): 122-132.
[3]	Zheng Ye, Jiang Yunshan, Qin Yi. Streamline administration and delegate power to enterprise, innovation environment and the innovation willingness of S&T micro- and small-enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(2): 65-72.
[4]	Wang Li, Xia Xuan. Why do user′s innovative behaviors appear and disappear in brand communities?——A study based on the perspective of sense of power [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(2): 176-183.
[5]	Zhou Zhou, Zhang Yiqian, Ran Rong. Protection of the rights and interests of consumers and investment in the innovation of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(1): 66-78.
[6]	Zhang Jiemei, Wang Hao. The influencing factors on the willingness to participate in virtual corporate social responsibility co-creation [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(8): 90-99.
[7]	Dong Zhu, Zhang Xin. Analyst optimism bias and corporate R&D investment: An empirical study based on conflicts of interest and transparency of information [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(7): 181-188.
[8]	Li Jiangjin, Liu Chunlin, Li Juexing. Leadership′s self-fulfilling prophecy of employee creativity from an intergenerational perspective [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(6): 194-201.
[9]	Chen Nabo, Chen Yonghong, Tan Tongdan. The "control right" distribution and action logic in government performance evaluation [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(5): 191-199.
[10]	Yu Feifei, Wang Liting. Research on the paths of technological innovation enabled by digital technology in Chinese manufacturing enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(4): 11-19.
[11]	Zheng Yaoyi, Su Yi. Power concentration and independent innovation intention of entrepreneurs: An analysis from both internal and external perspectives [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(2): 176-183.
[12]	Yang Jiaoping, Dai Wanliang, Li Hao. The person-post matching, resource empowerment and innovation passion of employees in platform enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(10): 200-208.
[13]	Liu Binbin, Zuo Yonghua. An analysis of the government-subsidy effect on the impact of financial misallocation on technological innovation: A study from the perspective of enterprises′ ownership difference [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(1): 61-69.
[14]	Zhang Yin, Zhang Qianhui, Zheng Haidong. A research on the marketing staff′s empowerment mechanisms based on online business communities [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(4): 201-208.
[15]	Xiao Xiaohong, Tian Qinghong, Wang Zhanjie. Can stakeholder′ environmental orientation promote green innovation?——A moderated mediation model [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(12): 158-166.

Relationships between stakeholders and enterprise technology innovation performance:Empirical analysis on stakeholders with high degree balance

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics