A research on the duration of China's export and its decisive factors based on the CloglogModel

Abstract

Abstract: Using the non-parameter Kaplan-Meier method and the discrete time Cloglog model, this paper empirically studies the duration of China's export and its decisive factors. The results indicate that the dynamic change of China's export relationship is very remarkable and the median of the duration is only two years. There is also the threshold effect for China's export. The survival rate of trade relationship is lower at the beginning, but the failure rate after four years declines significantly. The rising of economic scale, initial export volume, diversification and so on, will reduce the failure probability of export relationship. While the rising of geographic distance, unit value, RMB exchange rate and so on, will increase the failure probability of export relationship. Finally, this paper put forward some suggestion about how to lengthen the duration of China's export.

Key words: export, duration, Cloglog Model

CLC Number:

F740.6

Du Yunsu, Wang Lili. A research on the duration of China's export and its decisive factors based on the CloglogModel[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(7): 130-136.

References

[1] Besede, T.,Prusa,T.J.Ins, Outs, and the duration of trade[J].Canadian Journal of Economics,2006a,39(1):266-295. [2] Besede, T.,Prusa,T.J.Product differentiation and duration of US import trade [J].Journal of International Economics,2006b,70(2):329-358. [3] Nitsch, V.Die another day:Duration in german import trade [J].Review of World Economics,2009,145(1):133-154. [4] Obashi Ayako.Stability of production networks in east asia:Duration and survival of trade [J].Japan and the World Economy,2010,22:21-30. [5] Fugazza, M.,Molina,A.C.The determinants of trade survival [R].HEID Working Paper No.05/2009,2009. [6] Brentom P.,Saborowski C.,Von Uexkull E.What explains the low survival rate of developing country export flows [R].World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.4951. [7] Hess Woofgang,Persson Maria.Exploring the duration of EU imports [J].Review of World Economy,2011,147(4):665-692. [8] Esteve-Perezet al.The duration of firm-destination export relationships:Evidence from Spain:1997–2006 [J].Economic Inquiry,2013,51(1):159-180. [9] 邵军. 中国出口贸易联系持续时间及其影响因素分析——出口贸易稳定发展的新视角[J].管理世界,2011(6):24-33.Shao Jun.An analysis of the duration of China's export trade relation and its influencing factors [J].Management world,2011(6):24-33. [10] 陈勇兵等. 中国出口企业持续时间及其决定因素研究[J].经济研究,2012(7):28-41.Chen Yongbing,Li Yan and Zhou Shimin.The duration of firm-destination export relationship:Evidence from China [J].Economic Research Journal,2012(7):28-41. [11] Hess Wolfgang,Persson Maria.The duration of trade revisited:Continuous-time vs.discrete-time hazards [R].Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Working Paper Series 829,2010. [12] Rauch,J.E.Networks versus markets in international trade [J].Journal of International Economies,1999,48(1):7-35.

[1]	Hu Jiabin, Yu Liping, Hong Jinzhu. Research on the impact of innovation resilience on the development of high-tech industries under the background of dual cycles [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(6): 51-61.
[2]	Guan Shu, Cheng Liwei, Xu Lili. Government subsidies, enterprise innovation models and export complexity [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(1): 48-55.
[3]	Xie Wei, Xu Meng, Wang Yanyu. Research on the influence effect of export intensity on innovation structures of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(1): 89-99.
[4]	Gao Yunsheng, Zheng Lekai, Li Zhixu. Research on the relationship between integration into GVCs and the technical level of China′s manufacturing export [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(9): 58-66.
[5]	Li Fan, Dai Yongwei, Zhang Di. Export activities, absorptive capacity, R&D cooperation and innovation performance [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(3): 125-133.
[6]	Yang Ye, Xie Jianguo. Emission reduction characteristics of export technology evolution: Catch-up, distortion and resource utilization efficiency [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(2): 36-45.
[7]	Li Changqing, Peng Xin. An analysis of the impact and paths of local tax competition on the quality of exported products [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(9): 34-43.
[8]	Xiong Mingning, Wang Tao, Wu Guangsheng. Impact of exporting strategy on innovation performance of emerging market enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(8): 131-140.
[9]	Ruan Min, Jian Ze. Domestic market competition, total factor productivity and international trade [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(6): 109-118.
[10]	Yu Liping, Dai Huayong, Cai Shaohong. A research on the influence effect of innovation quantity and innovation quality on foreign trade export [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(10): 116-125.
[11]	Du Weijian, Li Mengjie. A research on enterprise innovation-driven mechanism in the open economy [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(8): 91-98.
[12]	Wang Yurong, Wu Gang. Dynamic evolution of the IT product trade growth factors between China and the United States [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(3): 20-28.
[13]	Li Changqing, Li Xin, Lu Jian. Threshold effect of export on enterprises’ green productivity [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(3): 59-68.
[14]	Song Zhijie, Zhao Tong, Xu Lei. Dynamic change and international comparison of domestic technical content in manufacturing exports [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(1): 53-63.
[15]	Li Changqing, Lv Xiaofeng, Wu Gang. R&D investment, financing constraints and green-tech content of Chinese exports [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(8): 28-35.