The innovation mode of generic technology in the industry cluster from the perspective of enterprise contribution

Abstract

Abstract: It is of great importance to inspect the industrial cluster enterprise contribution level in generic technology cooperation innovation. By establishing the cluster enterprise duopoly model and analyzing the best contribution level difference between Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimality, this paper comes to the proposition that the contribution of Pareto optimality is better than Nash equilibrium. Around this proposition and considering factors of industrial clusters, a cooperative innovation mode is extracted, which is conducive to achieving Pareto optimality for cluster enterprises in generic technology cooperation innovation. Furthermore, an organization operation mechanism is designed from the perspective of contract justice. In the end, the feasibility of the mode is proved by successful case.

Key words: contribution level, industry cluster, generic technology, cooperation mode

CLC Number:

C931.2

Zhao Hua, Li Jiang, Wei Hongzhu. The innovation mode of generic technology in the industry cluster from the perspective of enterprise contribution[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(6): 53-59.

References

[1] Tassey Gregory.The economics of R&D policy[M].Quorum books, USA, 1997. [2] 杜国贞, 肖岭.构建传统产业集群共性技术供给体系—一项对比研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2006, 13(9):71－76. [3] 虞锡君.产业集群内关键共性技术的选择—以浙江为例[J].科研管理, 2006, 27(1):56－61. [4] Sampson R.C.2004.Organizational choice in R&D alliances:Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives[J].Management and Decision Economics, 25 (6-7):421-436. [5] D'Aspremont Claude, Jacquemin Alexis.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review, 1988, 78:1133-1137. [6] Roberto Cellini, Luca Lambertini.Dynamic R&D with spillovers:Competition vs cooperation[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009, 33(3):568-582. [7] Jhon Hagedoorn.Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering:Inter organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14:371-385. [8] Tao Zhigang, Wu Chang.On the organization of cooperative research and development:Theory and Evidence [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1997, 15(5):573-596. [9] Pastor Maite, Sandonis Joe.Research joint ventures vs cross licensing agreements:An agency approach[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, 20(2):215-249. [10] Claudia Schmiedeberg.Complementarities of innovation activities:An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector[J].Research Policy, 2008, 37(9):1492-1503. [11] John Hagedoorn.Inter-firm R&D partnerships:An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960[J].Research Policy, 2002, 31(4):477-492. [12] Damiano B.Silipo.Incentives and forms of cooperation in research and development[J].Research in Economic, 2008, 62(2):101-119. [13] 周二华, 陈荣秋.技术开发的类型与创新模式选择的关系[J].科研管理, 1999, 20(4):15-20.

[1]	Cen Jie, Ye Erzi, Xiao Yao. The double-edged sword effect of cross-domain search on generic technology spillover: The amplifying effect of industrial alliances [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(7): 77-90.
[2]	Tan Weijia. An analysis of coopetition among enterprises in industrial clusters——A study by taking the role of the promotion organization of the new generation information and communication industry cluster in Shenzhen as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(12): 29-35.
[3]	Wang Xu, Wang Lan, Yang Youde. The cooperation model and operation logic of emergency organizations in the context of major emergencies [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(12): 22-31.
[4]	Zhang Yanfang，Pariyesh Dharmarak. Predicament and solution for supply of generic technology for SMEs：A case study [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(8): 215-223.
[5]	Zheng Yuelong1,2, Yang Bai2, Wang Lin2. A study of the evolution of industrial generic technology R&D behaviors and their multiple failures [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(5): 164-174.
[6]	Qian Fangming, Ning Zijun. A study of labor-intensive industry clusters upgrading under the perspective of national value chains: A case study of Zhejiang Puyuan sweater industry cluster [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(2): 94-99.
[7]	Fan Xia， Huang Yan, Zhu Guilong. The innovation effects of university-industry collaboration on industrial generic technology [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(1): 34-44.
[8]	Zhu Bin, Ou Weiqiang. A research on the co-evolution of cross strait strategic emerging industry clusters [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(7): 35-46.
[9]	Yang Rui，Xia Bin. The building of network relations and its impacts on firm growth within clusters [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(5): 103-111.
[10]	Xiong Yongqing, Bai Yun, Chen Xiaohong. Enterprise partner evaluation of generic technology development in strategic emerging industries—Construction and application of double-dimension and two-phase model [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(8): 68-74.
[11]	Wang Song, Sheng Ya. Cluster innovation network cooperation degree, network openness,and cluster incremental performance with the environmental uncertainty [J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (2): 52-61.
[12]	Huang Zhiqi. The model and empirical analysis of knowledge spillover effects in hi-tech industry clusters [J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(1): 154-162.
[13]	Chen Jin, Wu Bo. The impact of openness on the acquisition of external key resourcesby enterprises with open innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(9): 10-21,106.
[14]	Ding Minglei, Liu Binglian. The main issues and countermeasures of Chinese industrial technology system [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(7): 33-39.
[15]	Yu Binbin, Lu Lijun. The supply mechanism of cluster generic technology [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(5): 132-138.